≡× MENU

• Caesar_v roztin
• Calendar chips
• Blood tests
• Sleepy period
• Preparing for the fall

Court Yes. Prior to the problem of the competence of the court of the Eurasian Economic Union and the constitutional court of the Russian Federation Chapter VII

Vіdpovіdno to paragraph 13 of the Statute of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union (addition No. 2 to the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union dated 29 May 2014)

1. Approve the Rules of Procedure to the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union, whatever it may be.

2. The decision is gaining rank from the date of nabuttya rank by the Agreement on the Eurasian Economic Union of 29 May 2014.

For the sake of Eurasian Economics, Members:

View of the Republic of Belarus

Inspection of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Type of Russian Federation

Regulations
Court of the Eurasian Economic Union
(approved by the decisions of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council for the sake of December 23, 2014, No. 101)

This Regulation determines the order and organization of activities to the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union with the method of implementation of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union dated 29 May 2014.

Article 1
Appointment

The understanding that they are victorious in this Regulation means the following:

“act to the Court” - a decision to the Court, an advisory bill to the Court, or praised the Court;

"skarga" - a statement about the denial of the decision of the Collegium to the Court before the Appeal Chamber to the Court;

“zatsіkavleny participant in the dispute” - power - a member of the Union, the Commission;

"applicant" - a power - a member of the Union, an organ to the Union, spіvrobitniki and landowners of the organs of the Union and the Court in accordance with paragraph 46 of the Statute of the Court, if they are filed from an application for clarification;

"application for clarification" - an application referred to by paragraph 46 of the Statute of the Court;

"declaration" - a declaration of a power - a member of the Union or a subject of sovereignty in disputes assigned to paragraph 39 of the Statute of the Court;

“positive” - a power - a member of the Union or a subject of the state, in accordance with paragraph 39 of the Statute of the Court;

"Komіsіya" - the Eurasian Economic Commission, as a permanent regulatory body of the Union;

"Consultative visnovok to the Court" - an act to the Court, which is accepted for the results of the review of the statement about the rose'clarification;

"organs to the Union" - organs to the Union, with the vindication of the Court, appointed by Article 8 of the Treaty;

"vіdpovidach" - power - a member of the Union, the Commission;

“praised the Court” - an act to the Court, which is to be blamed for the hour of the judiciary from the procedural power of the activity to the Court;

"decision to the Court" - an act to the Court, which is to be blamed for the results of a review of the right, before paragraphs 104 - 110 of the Statute of the Court;

"Soyuz" - the Eurasian Economic Union, the foundations are subject to the Agreement;

Statute of the Court - the Statute of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union, which is addendum No. 2 to the Treaty;

"sides" - positivity and opinion on the dispute, which is being considered in the Court; Court - the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union, which is the permanent judicial body of the Union.

Article 2
Mova Sudochinstva

1. All documents are submitted to the Court by the Russian language or with the addition of their certified translation by the Russian language.

The correctness of the translation of documents shall be verified by the translator in accordance with the legislation of the state, which made the translation official.

2. The judiciary is composed of Russian language. Individuals, like taking a fate from the right, do not have the right to Russian my mother, may have the right to give an explanation to my other, that koristuvatisya by the services of translation.

Chapter I

Article 3
Organization of activity to the Court

From food that is not related to the provisions of justice, transferred by the Statute to the Court, cim Regulations, as well as from other food of an organizational nature, which are introduced by the Head of the Court, plenary sessions of the Court are held in the order appointed by the Head of the Court.

The bags of the plenary session are drawn up in the final protocol.

Article 4
Folding the oath

When you enter the seat of the judge of the Court (further - the judge) at the plenary session of the Court, I take an oath of offensive swearing: “I swear to honestly and summarily to win my shoes, be unpreemptable and fair, like ordering me to be bound by the judge.”

Article 5
Obrannya Golovi Sudu that yogo intercessor

1. The head of the Court and his intercessor are collected on the planting of s-pomіzh usіh judges with the improvement of paragraph 15 of the Statute of the Court by the full warehouse of judges in the way of secret voting.

3. Let's put the Golovi on the landing The court is respected by the judge, who has scored the most votes in the total warehouse of judges.

4. In the case of equal votes, a second vote shall be held according to the number of judges who scored greater number golosiv. Let's change the hour of the second vote, the candidate who won the most number of votes against other candidates is considered.

5. The defense of the intercessor of the Head of the Court is established by the order, given this article for the defense of the Head of the Court, after the defense of the Head of the Court.

6. Podbags of the Head of the Court of that intercessor are drawn up by a protocol, which is signed by all the judges and is directed to the Great Eurasian Economics for the sake of (further - Vishcha glad).

Article 6
Initiative on how to reinstate the court

1. The initiative of a member state to the Union (hereinafter referred to as a member state) about attaching renewed importance to the court filed by it on the basis of paragraph 12 of the Statute of the Court, is implemented by a way of overpowering the legal letter of submission to Vishchoy for the sake of adding the necessary documents, so go ahead and form.

2. An initiative to the Court to renew the court on the basis of paragraph 12 of the Statute of the Court, is implemented for the additional direction of the Head of the Court of a written letter to Vishchoi for the sake of an additional protocol signed by all the judges, for the court’s indispensable document.

3. The court's initiative to reinstate its own importance on the basis of clause 12 of the Statute of the Court is implemented by way of enforcement of the written letter submission with the addition of the necessary documents to the Head of the Court, which is to be submitted for consideration by the Supreme Court.

Article 7
Notes attached to the court

1. At the time of the re-appointment of the court, which is to enter the warehouse of the Grand Collegium, the Court, in accordance with the procedure referred to by Article 6 of the Rules, shall be held at the right about the resolution of the dispute and at the right about roses, the clarification should be made before entering the landing of the new court.

2. At the time of attaching a new court, which enters to the warehouse of the Collegium of the Court, in accordance with the procedure referred to by Article 6 of the Rules, to the warehouse of the Collegium of the Court, the next judge of that member state itself is included.

3. At the time of the new court, which enters the warehouse of the Appeal Chamber, the Court, in accordance with the procedure referred to by Article 6 of the Rules, is attached to the scarga until the new court enters the landing.

4. The provisions of this statute shall not be enforced at the times of the court's re-principling on the basis of subparagraph 6 of paragraph 12 of the Statute of the Court.

5. At the time of the change, the judge can see through again.

Rozdil II. Return to court

Article 8
Declaration by Member Power resolving the dispute

1. The application of a Member Power shall be:

a) name of the Court;

b) the official name of the state;

c) the name of the submission;

d) submit for trial before the Court (valid up to paragraph 39 of the Statute of the Court) and possibly rely on the request for specific facts;

e) statement of the Commission act (name, number, date of adoption, date of publication) and (or) description of the Commission (for super-checks assigned in paragraphs 4 and 5 of subparagraph 1 of paragraph 39 of the Statute of the Court);

e) information about pretrial pre-trial procedure in settling a dispute (subject to paragraph 43 of the Statute of the Court);

g) information about the most important representative, including the location, postal address, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address (for visibility);

h) date of submission of the application.

The declaration of a Member State shall be signed by a special one, designated under paragraph 1 of Article 31 of the Regulations.

2. The following documents shall be submitted before the declaration of a Member State:

(a) Documents that certify the powers of the Member Power;

b) documents confirming the pretrial procedure for pre-trial settlement of the dispute;

c) contesting the decision of the Commission (for super-judgments, paragraph four of subparagraph 1 of paragraph 39 of the Statute of the Court);

d) documents that certify the re-signing of the application, with a vint of retraction, if such acknowledgment is not necessary;

e) documents confirming the submission of a copy of the application and documents that are submitted to it.

As the subject of the dispute is the supply of industrial subsidies, which are in charge of the laws of the national economy of a Member State, before the application is also submitted documents and statements, referred to by paragraph 24 of the Protocol on a single rule for the granting of industrial subsidies (addition No. 28 to the Treaty).

3. The application and documents submitted to it are submitted in 1 copy on a paper nose, as well as on an electronic nose.

Article 9
Statement of the subject of the state about the resolution of the dispute

1. The application of the subject of the state state shall state:

a) name of the Court;

b) information about the applicant (name, name, according to the father (for visibility) of the physical person and data about the registration as an individual enterprise or the name of the legal person and data about the registration);

c) place of residence of a physical person or place of residence of a legal person, including the official name of the state, postal address (address for listing), as well as telephone number, fax, e-mail address (for visibility);

d) the rights of those legal interests, yakі, to the idea of ​​the subject of the state, violated by contesting the decisions of the Commission and (or) the action (irrational) of the Commission, as well as the factual situation of the state, on which it is possible to subdue the state, statistics;

e) information about contesting the decision of the Commission (name, number, date of acceptance, date of publication) and (or) description of the Commission's decision;

f) information about pretrial pre-trial procedure in dispute settlement;

g) the date of submission of the application.

The application is signed by a special one, designated in paragraphs 1 or 2 of Article 32 of the Regulations.

2. The applicant shall be appointed in such a capacity of the sovereign subject in accordance with subparagraph 2 of paragraph 39 of the Statute of the Court: on the recognition of the decision of the Commission, or on the other hand, there is a provision that does not comply with the Treaty and (or) international treaties within the framework of the Union and (or) on the recognition of the award (non-dialnosti) Commissions that do not oppose the Agreement and (or) international agreements within the framework of the Union.

3. Before the application of the subject of the state, the following documents are submitted:

a) contesting the decision of the Commission (for super-judgments, passing a paragraph to another subparagraph 2 of paragraph 39 of the Statute of the Court);

b) a copy of the certificate of registration of a legal entity or a physical entity as an individual enterprise;

c) documents confirming the pretrial pre-trial procedure in settling the dispute;

d) trust or other documents that confirm the renewal of the signature of the application;

e) a document confirming the payment of the mit;

e) documents confirming the sending of a copy of the application and documents that are submitted to it;

g) other documents and vіdomosti, scho obґruntovuyut help of the gospodaryuyuchy subject.

4. The application and documents submitted to it are submitted in 1 copy on a paper nose, as well as on an electronic nose.

Article 10
Application by a Member Power to the body of the Union for clarification

1. An application by a Member State or an organ of the Union for clarification shall be assigned:

a) name of the Court;

b) the official name of the state to the body of the Union;

c) the provisions of the Treaty, international treaties within the framework of the Union and the decision of the bodies of the Union, for which it is necessary to clarify;

d) information about the most important representative, including the location, postal address, telephone number, fax, e-mail address (for visibility);

e) the date of filing the application for clarification.

2. An application for a clarification is signed by a special one, assigned to paragraph 1 of Article 31 of the Regulations.

3. Before the application, the necessary documents are submitted, including documents confirming the re-approval of the individual for signing the application, with a vinnyatkiv, if such confirmation is not necessary.

Article 11
Statement of a practitioner of a landowner about rose's explanation

1. In the application of a spіvrobіtnik or a landed individual to the body of the Union or the Court for clarification, the following are appointed:

a) name of the Court;

b) information about the applicant (nickname, name, according to father (for presence), tenure, community);

c) place of residence, postal address (listing address), as well as telephone, fax, e-mail address (for availability);

d) statements about documents confirming the fact of pracevlashtuvannya in the body of the Union and the Court;

e) the provisions of the Agreement, international agreements within the framework of the Union and the decision of the bodies of the Union, related to labor legal documents, to the provision of food, to any need for clarification, from the supplement of the necessary documents;

f) the date of filing the application for clarification.

2. The application shall be signed by the applicant or by his representative, the proof of which is confirmed by relevant documents seen by the applicant.

3. Documents shall be submitted before the application confirming the fact of the practice in the body of the Union of the Judiciary.

Article 12
Application registration

State what you wished, skarga, statements about roses and clarifications are registered in the order appointed by the Head of the Court.

Rozdil III. Molded blue. Appointment to the warehouse of the Court

Article 13
The order of molding is to refer to the appointment of the warehouse to the Court, head court, court - additional delivery to the right

1. The head of the Court on the presentation of the registration of the application, the skarga, the statement about the clarification at the right warehouse to the Court, including the judge - additional information from the right (then - the judge-additional), the secretary of the court session and the transfer of such an application, the skarga, the statement about roz'yasnennya on rozglyad vіdpovіdnogo warehouse Court.

2. The judge does not have the right to take part in the court session, and also to withdraw from the court session without the permission of the head judge. Appointed to help expand on the guilt of the aktiv Court to the court of justice.

Article 14
The head judge and the judge-adopovidach at the Grand Collegium of the Court

1. Judicial sessions of the Grand Collegium of the Court are held by the Head of the Court, which is the Head.

2. Judge-addition is appointed as a judge from the warehouse of the Great College of the Court on the basis of the name of the judge, starting from the first letter of the Russian alphabet.

Article 15
Head-headed judge and judge-adopovidach at the Collegium of the Court

1. Judge-addition at the Collegium of the Court is appointed judge from the warehouse of the Collegium of the Court on the basis of the name of the judge, starting from the first letter of the Russian alphabet.

2. Heading at the Collegium of the Court є judge-adopovidach.

Article 16
Heading judge and judge-adopovidach in the Court of Appeal

1. Judge-adviser in the Court of Appeal shall be appointed to the Court as a judge from the warehouse of the Court of Appeal according to the call of the judge, starting from the first letter of the Russian alphabet.

2. Heading in the Appeal Chamber to the Court є judge-adopovidach.

Article 17
Court session secretary

The secretary of the court session, as a rule, is the assistant to the judge.

Section IV. The principles of judiciary

Article 18
The principles of judiciary

The judiciary is established on the basis of principles assigned to paragraphs 53 and 69 of the Statute of the Court.

Article 19
Independence of judges

1. Judges shall administer justice regardless of whether there is any third-party influx, respecting the law of the Union, the fundamental principles and norms of international law.

2. It is not allowed to be instructed by the judges in any case of justice.

Article 20
Glasnіst razglyad

1. Judicial sittings at all rights shall be held openly and publicly. The exchange of publicity is allowed to be seen with the help of the security of the defense of the exchanged wideness.

2. For the presence of the right documents, which could avenge the information of the fugitive rozpovsudzhennya, the Court, at its own initiative or for the fussing of the parties, may hold a closed court session in accordance with all the rules established by these Rules.

Article 21
Publicity

1. Acts of the Court are publicly voiced and published in the official bulletin of the Court and on the official website of the Court in the information and telecommunications media "Internet" (hereinafter - the official website of the Court).

2. On the right, looked at the closed court session, the Court can close the publicity of the materials on the right of the part, which contains information from the closed court session.

Article 22
Equity of the parties

The parties that take part in the judgment of the court are protected by equal procedural rights and bear equal procedural obligations.

Article 23
Magnificence

1. Pozivach goiter to denounce his wimogi, and vodpovidach may have the right to file a waiver on the plea of ​​wimogi.

2. The parties may have the right to know about the arguments one to one to the cob of the ship's view.

3. The parties bear the risk of nasledkiv infliction of procedural actions by them.

Article 24
Collegiality

The court sits justice at the warehouse of the Grand Collegium of the Court, the Collegium of the Court and the Court of Appeal.

Chapter V

Article 25
Stages of litigation on the right about the resolution of disputes

1. Litigation on the right about the resolution of disputes consists of two stages: writing and writing.

2. The writing stage includes the submission of an application to the Court, the submission of other documents and materials that are pending dispute, or certified copies of a specialized group (for such a group).

3. The preliminary stage includes the additional court-addition, hearing of the osib, how to take part in the superechts, visnovkiv experts, fakhivtsiv, as well as the disclosure of documents, materials, rulings to the Court and the decision of the Court.

Article 26
Judge-dopovidach

Judge-adopovidach:

a) prioritize the competence of the Court to look at the super check;

b) reviewing the correctness of the completed application, її the validity of the declaration;

c) reviewing the established pre-trial procedure in settling the dispute and the presence of documents confirming the pre-trial procedure;

d) determine the completeness and sufficiency of the submitted documents and materials;

e) reviewing the evidence of the decision to the Court, having gained certitude, from the earlier reviewed superchka between the parties themselves about the same subject from the quiet substations and furnishings;

f) prepare a proposition about the acceptance of the application before the court, or about the decision of the acceptance;

g) ensuring the formation of a special group in the cases, referred to by paragraph 82 of the Statute of the Court;

h) organizing a court session;

i) sdіysnyuє іnshі novanovanіnnya vіdpovіdno іn thіs Regulation.

Article 27
head judge

Head-headed judge at the court seat:

a) when the court session is deafened, like a super girl looking at it;

b) denounce the warehouse to the Court, the secretary of the court session, osіb, scho superechtsі, zatsіkavlenih participants in the dispute;

c) reviewing the appearance at the court session of representatives of the parties, other parties, as to take part in the dispute, the participants in the dispute, and the documents that testify to their person and confirm their appearance;

d) establish, with due rank, the notification of the individual, if they did not appear at the court session, that if they were informed about the reasons for their failure to appear;

bud) roz'yasnyuє parties, іnshimi persons, scho superechtsі, zatsіkavlenim participants in the dispute їх procedural rules and bindings;

f) inquire about the possibility of hearing, including the need to examine in a closed court session;

g) ask for a request to take part in the dispute, the participants in the dispute before the courtroom for hearing;

h) proponuє to the Court to determine the sequence of procedural actions and establishes the opinions of the Court of that party;

i) conduct the court session, ensure that for the universal and complete investigation of the evidence, the circumstances are correct, proponing the persons, as if they take part in the dispute, give an explanation of that tax, evidence behind the circumstances, which may be significant for the resolution of the dispute;

j) to take care of the statement and the fussing of the osib, as if taking part in the dispute;

k) live at any time when visiting a ship's meeting in due order;

l) declaring a break in the court session for a break, at the current non-working hour, for preparing the parties or their representatives to the final stage, as well as at the time of vindication of the situation, which interrupt the normal break of the court session, or for other reasons.

Article 28
Court session secretary

Secretary of the court session:

a) the form of the materials, refer to the folded description of the documents;

b) zdіysnyuє osіdomlennya osіb, yakі take part in the dispute, zatsіkavlenih participants in the dispute about the place and hour of the court session;

c) ahead of time, review the appearance of the osib, which is in superechtsi, zatsikavlenyh participants in the dispute;

d) ensure that you know the deficiencies, if you take part in the dispute, send copies of the acts to the Court with the materials;

e) keep and draw up the protocol of the court session, ensuring the accuracy of its accuracy;

f) zdіysnyuє sberіgannya materialiv prid hour of the ship's review;

g) vikonuє іnshі doruchennya suddi-dopovіdacha.

Article 29
Individuals, yakі take the fate of the superechtsі

1. Individuals, yakі take the fate of the superechtsі, є:

a) parties, their representatives;

b) experts, including experts from specialized groups, faculty, as well as certificates and translations.

2. The parties, their representatives shall have the right to:

a) familiarize yourself with the materials with reference, make a signature, make copies, take copies of the acts to the Court from the sight of the document;

b) declare to fakhivtsy, experts, including experts of specialized groups, klopotannya, robit declare, give explanations in letters and oral forms, as well as electronically, suggest your own arguments for the sake of blaming them for an hour looking at the dispute;

c) present whether documents or materials, which may be important for the correct resolution of the dispute, that take the fate of them;

d) get to know the murmurings, declared by other persons, like taking a fate from superechtsі, that submit their own remarks;

e) put food for other persons, like taking a fate from the super-echoes;

f) enjoy other procedural rights granted to him by the Rules of Procedure, the Statute of the Court and international treaties at the borders of the Union.

3. Side, their representatives goiter:

a) Appear at the court's notice;

b) superimpose on the other side copies of procedural documents;

c) get used to visiting at the time of ensuring the appearance of an expert, a specialist, a certificate, a translation, calling to the Court for their troubles;

d) summarily respect one's rights and not evil them;

e) to enforce other procedural obligations transferred under the Rules, the Statute of the Court and international treaties at the borders of the Union.

4. Expert, specialist to determine the right:

a) familiarize yourself with the materials with reference to what lies before the subject of the examination;

b) put food for other people, like taking a fate from superechtsі;

c) to declare a fuss about the supply of additional materials for the application of a visnovka.

5. Expert, fahivets є on the court і to present the visnovoks of the food in the letter form.

An expert, fahіvets act in his own special capacity, not as representatives of the powers-members of these organizations, act independently, and also do not appear on the same side and cannot take any instructions from them.

An expert, fahіvets cannot take part in a dispute, in what stink before they took a part like representatives, believe either lawyers of one side or in a different way.

6. Experts of specialized groups may have the right to:

a) be at court sessions;

b) familiarize yourself with the materials of reference, which lie before the subject of the dispute, work on the signature, know copies of the materials of reference, familiarize yourself with the audio and video recordings of court sessions;

c) put food for other people, like taking a fate from the super-echoes;

d) to file a complaint about the supply of additional materials for the submission of a visnovka, about the holding of a court session.

7. Retranslation є on the court call. Translations may have the right to put a request for clarification of the translation.

8. Reports after a viklik to the Court, proving the evidence on the essence of the examined superechki, yakі vіdomі yoma osobyto, ta goiter’s opinion on the additional nutrition of the judiciary that osіb, yak take part in the superechci.

Article 30
Participants in the dispute

1. Applicants to the dispute, the member state or the Commission, clamoring about those about allowed to enter into the right as a participant in the dispute, transferring paragraph 60 of the Statute of the Court, satisfied with the Court.

2. Klopotannya about joining the right as a stubborn participant in the dispute can be filed before the decision is made to the Court. Representatives of the interested party to the dispute before the Court may be individuals designated under paragraph 1 of Article 31 of the Rules.

3. The court is pleased with the appointment of paragraph 2 of the article of the article to complain about the court's commendation.

Article 31
Representatives of the Member Powers, Commissions at the Court

1. Representatives of the member states of the Commission in the Court may act in the following cases:

a) an official of a member state, as if representing his state without authority, up to the standards of international law;

b) certifiers of the affirming bodies and organizations of the Member Powers, designated by paragraph 49 of the Statute of the Court;

c) Head of the Collegium of the Commission;

d) other individuals, the appearance of which is confirmed by relevant documents, seen by individuals, designated in subparagraphs "a" - "c" of this paragraph.

2. The evidence of the representatives is verified by the head judge in the court session, and the evidence presented to the Court of documents confirming such a recognition. The court, on the basis of the submission of documents, examines the evidence of the recognition of significant changes and the admission of the appointment of persons to participate in the court session as representatives of the member states and (or) the Commission in the Court.

Documents confirming the renewal of the representatives of the member states of that (or) Commission in the Court, are added to the materials of the right, or the record of the court session is recorded with information from these documents.

The Member Power, the Commission may have the right to replace its representative, or to appoint an additional representative, who does not draw upon himself the legal legacy for review in the Court.

3. In case of non-delivery of the necessary documents, the Court shall order the recognition of the representative of the member state of that (or) Commission, about which praise is to be blamed.

Article 32
Representatives of the subject of the government in the Court

1. Representatives of the applicant, who is the subject of the state, may appear before the Court as a representative of the subject of the state - a legal entity, or the subject of the state (individual pripriёmets), as they signed the application before the Court.

2. Representatives of the subject of the Lord may also be other persons, who are confirmed by the relevant documents, seen by persons, designated in paragraph 1 of the Article of Article.

3. The importance of the representatives of the subject of the state in the Court is checked by the head judge in the court session of the presentation of the documents submitted to the Court, which confirm such a recognition. The court, on the basis of the submission of documents, considers the evidence of the recognition of the recognizable persons and the admission of the appointment of persons to participate in the court session as representatives.

Documents confirming the renewal of representatives of the subject of the state, are added to the materials of the certificate, or the record of the court session is entered into the records of these documents.

Pozivach may have the right to replace your representative, or to appoint an additional representative, who does not draw upon himself the legal legacy for review in the Court.

4. In case of non-delivery of the necessary documents, the Court decides to recognize the representative of the subject of the sovereign, about which the decision is to be blamed.

Article 33
Praise declare to virobnitstva. Vidmova at the reception, declare before the death. Too much to declare without ruin

1. The court shall give praise for the acceptance of the declaration before the sale, as it is not otherwise referred to by paragraphs 2 or 3 of the article.

2. The court to give praise about the wife to the adoptee declare before the marriage, as follows:

b) the established pre-trial procedure for settling a dispute has not been completed;

c) before guilt, they praised the Court about accepting the application;

d) decision of the Court, which has gained certitude, from the earlier reviewed superechki between the same parties about the same subject and from the very same substations and furnishings;

e) the application was submitted to a sovereign authority or to an organization not assigned to a transfer, which is valid up to paragraph 49 of the Statute of the Court;

f) the applicant did not lose any nedolіki, which became the basis for the full application without damage.

3. The court to sing praises about the redundancy declare without ruhu in vipadkah, as follows:

a) mito not paid or not paid in full;

b) the application does not comply with the requirements, transferred to the Regulations, and (or) before the application did not submit the documents, transferred by Articles 8 or 9 of the Regulations.

In praise of the redundancy, declare without damage The court orders to submit for the cancellation of the declaration without disruption, that term, for which the applicant is guilty of wasting nedolіki, which became the basis for the declaration without disruption.

At the same time, the shortfalls that have become the basis for filing a claim without ruin will be stuck at the lines, insertions by a decision of the Court, the claim is accepted before the sale. On which day of due date you declare that you have been deprived of the ruin, the day of the removal by the Court of valid documents is respected.

At the same time, the shortfalls that have become the basis for the redemption of the application without ruin will not be stuck at the lines, the injunctions by the decision of the Court, the Court decides to accept the application before the sale.

4. At the time of the acceptance, declare before the collection of the mito, paid by the subject of the state, the return is not taken.

Article 34
Notify about acceptance before filing, about acceptance with acceptance before filing, about redundancy notify without rude

1. The court at the lines that do not exceed 10 calendar days from the date of due date, declare to the Court, inform the parties about the acceptance, declare before the date, about the excess, declare without damage, or about the acceptance, declare with an addendum before the notification of a copy of the ruling, and also inform about it possible zatsіkavlenih participants in the dispute.

2. At the time of acceptance of the application for submission, transferring subparagraph "e" of paragraph 2 of Article 33 of the Rules of Procedure, the Court at the lines that do not exceed 10 calendar days from the date of receipt of the application to the Court, also inform the Member Power through diplomatic channels the copy was praised as an addendum before the update.

Article 35
Additional and other documents and materials

1. Important documents in the dispute and submitted to the Court by persons who take part in the dispute, or are taken away by the Court on the initiative of the parties, letter documents, or information, explanations, other documents and materials, on the basis of which the Court establishes the presence or the existence of the circumstances zaperechennya storіn, as well as іnshі furnish, scho may be significant for the resolution of the dispute.

2. Letters of acknowledgment or other documents may not be filed after the end of the line established by the Court or before the cim Rules. Filings with broken lines of letters of respect, otherwise other documents cannot be obtained to the materials of the right, as otherwise they will not be passed on to the praise of the Court.

The date of submission of the document is important to confirm the date of its decision, or, as such, the actual date of its decision by the Court.

3. The Court evaluates important documents, as well as materials excluded up to paragraph 55 of the Statute of the Court, for its internal revisions, which are grounded on a universal, open, objective and unbiased legally evident materials.

Article 36
Information about the hour and place of the court session

Individuals who take part in superechtsі, zatsіkavlenі participants in the dispute in a reasonable term, are guilty but about the frequency of the court session, or shortening the okremoi procedural action.

The information is posted on the official website to the Court no later than 15 calendar days before the beginning of the court session, or the filing of a procedural order, as otherwise not transferred by these Regulations.

Article 37
Terms

1. The Court applauds the decision for the results of reviewing the dispute within the line established by paragraph 96 of the Statute of the Court.

2. The term of culpability for the resolution of any disputes, the subject of which is the supply of industrial subsidies, state support of the strong state, the establishment of special defense, anti-dumping and compensatory approaches, may be extended to paragraph 97 of the Statute of the Statute of the Statute.

The lines of culpability for resolving disputes over the settlement of disputes cannot exceed 135 calendar days.

3. The procedural lines are inserted by the Court for the purpose of fixing the remaining procedural lines at the boundaries of the lines, assigned to paragraphs 1 and 2 of the clause of the article.

4. The application of the party for the continuation of the procedural lines established by the Court is considered by the Court for 5 calendar days from the day such an application is received, about which praise is to be blamed.

5. Compliance with the right is clear up to article 52 of the Regulations by stretching the lines. From the day of renewal, the delivery of the right hand drawn lines is updated.

7. Interrupt the voice at the ship's sitting and do not interrupt the ship's view with a stretch of lines.

8. The break of the term begins on the next day after the calendar date, or on the day of the next day, by which the ear of the term is designated.

As the rest day of the term falls on a non-working day, on the day of the end of the term, the first working day after it is taken into account.

Article 38
Restricted advice

1. Notice may be given within 15 calendar days from the date of notifying the Court about the acceptance of the application before proceeding to forward to the Court that statement of your complaint to avenge:

a) the name of the vіdpovіdach, yogo mіstseznakhodzhennya;

b) legal arguments and factual circumstances, on which grounds the position of evidence is based;

c) information about the direction of the call;

d) transfer of documents and materials that are submitted;

e) the date and signature of the submission.

2. In case, if the court does not file its own statement on the application, the Court has the right to look at the super-book for the documents and materials that are available from the right.

Article 39
Prepare to see

1. Before the hour of preparation, do it before looking at the judge-dopovidach may have the right:

a) to demand positive taxes from the definitions of the terms documents and materials, which, in the opinion of the positive, are worth the dispute;

b) to demand the return of the tax from the appointments of the terms of their transfer to the application, as before the stink was not filed before the Court;

c) to ask the parties to specify their vouchers and restrictions and indicate the terms of submission of the necessary additional documents, materials;

d) indicate readiness before sight;

e) impose other procedural duties on the provision of the Rules, directed at the security of your own judgment.

2. The Court may have the right to consider the food for the necessary recognition of expertise, the training of specialists, the direction of the petition, in accordance with paragraph 55 of the Statute of the Court, about the problem of dealing with the interested party to the dispute, and also to consider for the sake of the parties the food that is available on that day.

3. The court, on the proposition of the court-adopovidach, determines the hour and the place of the court session, as well as the number of times, if they give a call in the court session, about which individuals are mentioned in a proper rank, if they take part in the superechtsi, the participants in the dispute.

Article 40
Presence of representatives of state authorities and organizations

The Court grants the possibility of attendance at court hearings to representatives of sovereign bodies and organizations of the Member Powers for the evidence of an appeal filed by the affirming bodies of that organization, designated in accordance with paragraph 49 of the Statute of the Court.

Article 41
self-initiated

1. Judge can not take the fate of the virishenni be-like a super-girl in times, as if you were a spivrobitnik, a representative, we will believe either a lawyer on one side, or we can see the blame for other reasons for influencing the results.

2. The presence of circumstances, assigned to paragraph 1 of the article, is substantiated for self-introduction of the court.

3. Self-introduction may be declared to the beginning of the dispute on the merits. In the course of examining the dispute, the statement about self-advancement is only allowed in the case, as the substantiation for self-advancement became known after the first examination of the dispute on the merits.

4. The application for self-admission of the court is considered by the warehouse of the Court, which has been accepted from the right before the filing. Judge, having declared self-identification, not taking part in guilt, praised the Court for its food.

Article 42
Inspection (samovidvid) of a specialist, expert

1. Fahivets, an expert, including an expert of a specialized group, cannot take part in the examination of the right, as if they were stench, representatives, believers, or lawyers of one side, or the stench of other reasons, to look at the results.

2. The presence of conditions, assigned to paragraph 1 of the article, is substantiated for the introduction (self-introduction) of a specialist, expert, including an expert of a specialized group.

3. Introducing (samovidvid) to a specialist, an expert, with a vindication of experts from specialized groups, may be declared to the beginning of the dispute on the merits. In the course of the review, the application for the withdrawal (self-introduction) is only allowed at the exit, as the submission for the entry (self-introduction) became the case after the cob of the review on the merits.

4. An application for the introduction (self-admission) of a specialist, an expert, including an expert of a specialized group, is examined by the Court, having accepted it from the right before the examination.

5. Based on the results of reviewing the application for the introduction (self-introduction) of a specialist, an expert, including an expert of a specialized group, the Court shall sue for a positive praise.

Article 43
Order at the court seat

1. At the entrance of the judges to the hall of the court session, all those present at the hall stand up.

2. Individuals, like taking the fate of superechtsi, go to the Court and judgment with the words: “High Court!” or "Your honor!".

Individuals, yakі take the fate of the superechtsі, with the permission of the head judge at the court sitting, stand to give their explanations and testimony to the Court that they are asked to be fed. Vіdstup vіd tskogo rule mozhe buti assumptions only with the permission of the head judge.

3. Arrangement of the head court in order in the ship's sittings with shoes for all those present at the hall.

The person, as if destroying the order at the court session, if the advance could be removed by the Court from the court session, about the need to file a record at the protocol of the court session.

The court can inform the side of the closed participant in the dispute about the violation of order by their representatives in the court session, about squeezing out the entry in the protocol of the court session.

4. The use of technical aids for recording is allowed with the permission of the Court with the approval of the views of the parties. About zastosuvannya tekhnіchnih zabіv rush in the record at the minutes of the court session.

Article 44
Judgment view

1. Look at the right zdіysnyuєtsya at vіdkritumu court session.

2. Judge-adopovidach inform the Court about the vikonan’s work from the preparation before the examination, and also submit the materials of the review. Judge-adopovidach in his speech does not have the right to express his thought freely.

The supply of a court-adopov_dacha can be put only by a court.

3. The review of the dispute starts from the speeches of the representatives of the positive, vindication.

Appointed individuals have the right to give the Court an explanation about the evidence they have submitted and the evidence demanded by the Court for their cloaking, to confirm the court’s clarification on the merits of the dispute that is being considered, and also, with the permission of the heady court, to put other side disputes in the court hearing.

4. The sequence of hearing of experts, specialists and certificates at the court session is determined by the Court. Judges and representatives of the parties, with the permission of the head judge, can put food to the appointed persons at the court session.

Article 45
Rechecking on the right for the statement of the subject of the state about the oskarzhennya decision of the Commission

1. When examining, check for the statement of the subject of the state about the oscarification of the decision of the Commission, or else the okremih position and (or) diy (lack of idleness) of the Commission

a) renewal of the Commission on the adoption of the challenged decision;

b) the fact of violation of the rights and legitimate interests of the subjects of the state in the sphere of entrepreneurship and other economic activity, given by the Treaty and (or) international treaties within the Union;

c) a disputed decision or other okremi provisions and (or) contested dії (non-duty) Commission on the validity of their Agreement and (or) international treaties at the borders of the Union.

2. Under the hour of consideration of the dispute, the subject of which is the supply of special defences, anti-dumping and compensatory approaches, the Court shall not go beyond the limits of the applicability of the factual conditions of the arguments, on which the power of the state subject is based, and also the materials of the impugned decision of the Commission.

Reconsideration of the decision of the Commission related to the zastosuvannya special zakhisnogo, anti-dumping or compensatory entry, as per subparagraph “c” of paragraph 1 of the article of the article, is interchanged with a reverification:

dotrimannya Commission suttvih procedural vimog, correct zastosuvannya rules of law, scho to change the acceptance of the denounced decision;

nalezhnogo vikoristannya Komіsієyu otrimanih vіdomostey, nalezhnogo vstanovlennya pіdstav of acceptance for oskarzhuvanogo rіshennya, obґruntovanostі vіdpovіdnih visnovkіv, vihodyachi s yakih Komіsієyu in order peredbachenomu Protocol about zastosuvannya spetsіalnih zahisnih, antidempіngovih that kompensatsіynih zahodіv stosovno tretіh kraїn (dodatok number 8 to the Agreement) osporyuvane rіshennya.

Article 46
Protocol of the court session

1. Protocol of the court session may be revenged:

a) the place of the date of the court session, as well as the hour of the first hour of that end;

b) Warehouse to the Court and information about the cases, how to take part in the dispute, zatsіkavlenih participants in the dispute;

c) a short summary of analyzes of nutrition and explanation, indication;

d) a record of procedural matters to the Court in the order in which the stench was small, a sign about goiter, given by experts, including experts from specialized groups, fakhivtsy, certificates and translations;

e) protocol praised, blamed by the Court.

2. The protocol is signed by the head judge and the secretary of the court session. Until the new can be added the letters submitted by the parties to the speeches in the judicial debate.

3. To ensure the full record of the court session, an audio and video recording of the court session is made, which is secured by the Registry of the Court.

Audio and video recordings of the court session are added to the materials of the reference.

Article 47
Failure to appear at the court session

1. Representatives of the parties of the goiter take part in the court session. The parties may have the right to povіdomiti the Court about the possibility of examining the dispute for their jurisdiction. At times of non-attendance of them, declare a dispute over their attendance and for their failure to appear at the court session. The Court has the right to issue a judicial review.

Non-appearance at the court session of the parties, a stubborn participant in the dispute, warning in due order about the hour of the court session, does not change the Court's view on the merits.

2. In case of non-attendance at the court session of experts, fakhivtsiv, certificates, translators, notifications in due order about the hour and the month of the court session, the Court may have the right to issue a court review, even though the parties did not declare a murmur about the dispute over the validity of the appointment of errors.

Article 48
Claim that troublesome side

Declaring that fussing of the parties, including the number of statements, on the merits, could be blocked, submitted to the Court in a letter form, may be announced orally at the hour of the court session, recorded before the protocol of the court session and vitiated by the Court immediately at the court session after the hearing of the parties

For the results of the review, I will look at the claims of the parties to the Court to vindicate the full praise.

Article 49
Participation at the ship’s meeting of experts, the committee of experts of specialized groups, fakhivtsiv, certificates, translators

1. For the inquisition of the parties, and for the necessary initiatives, the Court, in examining the dispute, may take the fate of experts, fakhivtsi, certificates, translations. The party, yak to complain about the appointment of osіb, goiter, give information about them (a nickname, іm'ya, according to the father's place of residence) and get used to how to secure their appearance before the Court.

2. Experts from specialized groups to take part in court sessions during the examination of disputes referred to in paragraph 82 of the Statute of the Court.

3. Before an expert, including an expert of a specialized group, a specialist, the transfer of the head judge will establish their data (name, name, according to the father, place of work, information about enlightenment), and roses explaining their procedural rights and bindings , about how to fight against the badge of the protocol of the court session. After that, an expert, a specialist expert of a specialized group, fahivets, perekladach give an appropriate goiter.

The expert (fahivets) gives the goitre of such a name: "I, (calling, im'ya, according to my father), goiter, I am going to vykonat my obov'yazyka of the expert (fahivets) honestly and sumly, rooting on professional knowledge and cherishing the power of perekonannyam" .

The translation is given by the goiter of such a change: "I, (name, im'ya, according to the father), goiter, I am trying to translate the translation correctly and again."

Goiter after reading that signature is added to the materials of reference, about which the sign at the protocol of the court session is to be tried.

4. Before the hearing, the testimony of the head judge will establish data on the special nature of the certificate and the rose of the procedural rights and obligations, about the need to fight for the sign at the protocol of the court session.

I give the goiter of an attacking zmist: “I, (name, name, after my father), goiter, I am obliged to give the Court only more truthful information about me, especially about the materials that are worthy of argument.”

Goiter after reading it and signing it with a certificate is added to the materials of reference, about the need to fight for the sign at the protocol of the court session.

Article 50
Break at the ship's seat

1. The court for the troubles of the representatives of the parties, or with the power of the initiative, can vote for a break at the court session for a long day.

At the time of the voicing, interrupt for a more trivaly term The court determines the hour and place of the continuation of the court session.

About the break in the court session, that yogo trivality to fight for the sign at the protocol of the court session.

2. Present in the hall of the court session until the announcement, interrupt the individuals who take the fate of the superechtsi, that zatsіkavlenі participants in the dispute are duly informed about the time of the continuation of the court session, and their failure to appear at the court session after the end of the interruption for the court session .

Article 51
Vіdkladennya ship review

1. The Court shall give a judicial review at the time of the non-appearance of an individual in the court session, as if taking the fate of the superechtsi, as if there were an individual at the Court, about informing about the hour of the court session.

2. As a person, as if taking the fate of the super-echo, she was duly informed about the hour and the month of the court session, stated the fuss about the court review of the reason for the non-appearance at the court session, the Court may issue a court review, if you need to know the reasons for the non-appearance.

3. The court may be satisfied with the fussing of the parties about the filing of a court review with a link to the necessary submission by the party of additional evidence, introduced by the Court of other procedural acts.

Judicial review can also be made in case of illness of the court, or for other reasons, due to the fact that a court session is held, it is impossible, on lines that do not exceed 14 calendar days.

4. When satisfied with the fussing about the appearance of the court's review, the Court may have the right to supplement the evidence that appeared, as in the court's court sittings. The certificates of these certificates are voiced at the new ship's session.

5. About the judgment of the court's review, the Court should be praised.

6. The court's view of the new ship's sitting is updated from the moment it was made.

Article 52
Prisupinennya that remembrance at the right

1. The court has the right to award the right to the right of the court:

a) reorganization of the positive;

b) a new order of judges to enter the warehouse of the Grand Collegium of the Court;

c) pripinennya new importance of the judge to enter the warehouse of the Court of Appeal;

d) non-pereperahuvannya (pereperakhuvannya not in full obsyasi) of the cost of paying for the services of experts of a specialized group when considering disputes referred to in paragraph 82 of the Statute of the Court.

2. The court, at the request of the parties, or at its own initiative, establishes the provision of the right after the attachment of the situation, which became the basis for the attachment of the right to the right.

3. About the progress of the order at the right, and also about the renewal of the Court at the lines, which do not exceed 5 calendar days from the date of the present day, or the assignment of the appointments at paragraph 1 of the statute of the conditions, which served as a basis for the confirmation or the renewal of the provision at the right, to bring in a copy of which is to be given to the parties, as well as to the participants in the dispute.

Article 53
Judicial debates and remarks

1. After the completion of the examination of all evidence, the head judge in the court session declared about the completion of the examination of evidence and the transition to the court debate.

2. Judicial debates are formed from the speakers of the parties or their representatives, in order to establish their position according to the dispute.

The participants in the court debates have no right to ask for an opinion, if they were not challenged by the Court, and evidence that they lasted until the hour of the court session.

3. If I speak to all the participants in the court debates, they may have the right to speak with replicas. The right of the remaining replica belongs to the representative of the presentation.

4. After the completion of the court debates and replicas, the Court is seen to commend the decision, about which the presence at the court session hall is deafened and the record of the court session protocol is made.

Article 54
worldly pleasure

Side with the dispute, if, until the judgment is reached, the Court can regulate the super river with a way of laying down the world, about which the Court is informed.

Article 55
Vіdmova vіd vymog аbо vіdklikannya declare

Pozivach may have the right to act in his own capacity, he could often, or he would repeat it, or he might file a statement, if it is until the decision is brought to the Court.

Article 56
Pripinennya provadzhennya at the right

1. The court arbitrates the right to establish that:

a) consideration of the dispute is not within the competence of the Court;

b) the parties laid down the world please;

c) pozyvach vіdmovivsya vіd svoїh vіg аbо vіdklikav application;

d) є decision to the Court, as if nabulo chivalry, from the earlier reviewed superchka between the same parties about the very subject and from the quiet substations and furnishings.

2. About the attachment to the right of the Court at the lines, which do not exceed 5 calendar days from the day of the present situation, which served as a basis for the attachment of the settlement, to give praise, a copy of which is to be given to the parties, and also to the participants of the dispute.

Section VI. Specialized groups

Article 57
The order of creation of a specialized group

1. The formation of a specialized group shall be secured by a referee-advisor in accordance with subparagraph “g” of Article 26 of the Regulations.

2. Judge-adopovіdach zdіysnyuє pіdgotovki propozitіy shkodo warehouse spetіlіzovanої grupita and bring їх to the consideration of the Court.

When appointed to the warehouse of a special group of judges-additional adjudication in advance with experts, the candidates for inclusion in the warehouse, the possibility of their participation in the right to ask them about the presence or the presence of the person designated in paragraph 89 of the Statute of the dispute, within the framework of the conflict, the dispute is settled.

3. About the creation of a specialized group, the Court should be praised.

4. Regarding the adoption of the decision of the Court on the creation of a special group of the line of filing applications for the admission (self-introduction) of experts of a special group in different cases, transferred by paragraphs 88 and 89 of the Statute of the Court, the experts of the special group of the party are informed.

At once, at the address of the experts of the specialized group, all the materials that can be seen before the dispute are submitted.

5. The right to apply for the introduction (self-introduction) of an expert of a special group with a contribution may be submitted by the parties, or an expert of a special group is obviously.

The introduction (self-administration) of an expert of a special group may be declared no later than the line established in the decision of the Court on the creation of a special group.

The court considers the application for the introduction (self-introduction) of an expert of a specialized group and to make a decision about її satisfaction with the times of non-compliance could paragraphs 88, 89 of the Statute of the Court.

6. In times of judgment by the Court, that the expert did not explicitly tell about the presence of a new conflict of interest, the Court included in the warehouse of a specialized group that immediately informed about the member state, as filed by that expert, for consideration specialized expert. groups at the examination of other disputes referred to by paragraph 82 of the Statute of the Court.

7. At the time of satisfaction with the application for the introduction (self-admission) of an expert of a special group, as well as for the change of an expert of a special group, which is a vibula, in order, before paragraphs 1 - 4 of paragraph 1 of article 4

Article 58
Organization of activity of a specialized group

1. Information and organizational and technical security of the activity of a specialized group is established by the Secretariat of the Court with the improvement of paragraph 88 of the Statute of the Court.

2. Experts of the specialized group independently organize their work from the preparation of the laying of the specialized group.

Article 59
Visnovok of a specialized group

1. Visnovok of a specialized group is submitted to the Collegium to the Court at the lines, but it does not exceed 30 calendar days from the date of creation of a special group.

The term of preparing the laying of a special group can be continued by a decision of the Collegium of the Court for a reasoned statement of experts of a special group, as a rule, for lines no longer than 15 calendar days.

2. The following statements are assigned to a specialized group:

a) the results of the investigation of the situation and arguments, which should be proven to be positive, that the counterclaim, the circumstances of the arguments submitted by other persons, as to take part in the dispute;

b) international practice of looking at similar super-checks and stosuvannya of valid norms;

c) vysnovki about presence or appearance of damage;

d) vysnovki shkodo zastosuvannya vіdpovіdnyh compensatory zahodіv іn razі nіyavnosti vіshchennya vynesennі vynesennі schodo sporіvnі, the subject of є podannya nadannya promislovih subsidіy аbo vіd vіdvіv іn podtrimki іlskogo gosudarstva;

e) in other cases, if a special group is aware of the need to show their visnovka.

3. Visnovok is signed by experts of a specialized group and submitted to the Court for consideration.

4. Visnovok of a specialized group is voiced by the court judge and is examined in order with other evidence from the right.

The experts of the specialized group after the announcement of the goiter’s goiter give on the new necessary explanation that the opinion on food to the Court is osib, yak to take the fate of the superechtsi.

Section VII. Litigation in the Court of Appeal

Article 60
Order of review by the Court of Appeal

The Appeal Chamber of the Court examines the right of the court session for the rules of the examination of the Collegium of the Court, transferring the Rules, with the improvement of the features established by the Statute of the Court and the head.

Article 61
Right to Disclaimer

The decision of the Collegium of the Court may be denounced to the Court of Appeal.

At the risk of the decision of the Collegium of the Court, no new opinions can be declared, as they were not the subject of review by the Collegium of the Court.

Article 62
The term for the tribute of scarga

The scarga may be filed within 15 calendar days from the day the decision was praised by the Collegium of the Court.

Article 63
Zmist skargi

1. The following statements are assigned to scars:

a) name of the Court;

b) the number of the reference date of the decision, the name of the parties to the dispute, the subject of the dispute;

c) information about the person, as if giving a scarga (name, name, according to the father (for obviousness) of the physical person and data about the registration as an individual admission, or the name of the legal person and data about the registration);

d) the place of residence of a physical person or the place of residence of a legal person, including the official name of the state, the postal address (address for listing), as well as the telephone number, fax number, email address (for visibility);

e) if the individual, as if filing a skarga, about slander, or in part, or about changing the decision of the Collegium of the Court, or about applauding the new decision, the right is clear up to paragraphs 108 and 109 of the Statute of the Court;

f) bring, on the grounds of which the individual is able to run, with the provisions of the Treaty and (or) international treaties within the framework of the Union, violations of the rights and legitimate interests, in fact, provide evidence and evidence;

g) the date of submission of the scarga.

2. The scarga shall be signed in a special way, designated in paragraph 1 of Article 31, in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 32 of the Regulations.

3. The following documents are added to the scarga:

a) a copy of the decision of the Collegium to the Court, which is to be offended;

b) documentary evidence that the individual must be primed, as if giving a scarga;

c) documents confirming the force or handing over to the other party a copy of the hard copy and adding documents to it;

d) approval of other documents that confirm the renewal of the signing of the scarga.

4. Skarga and the documents that are submitted to it are submitted to the Court in one copy, as well as on an electronic carrier.

Article 64
Praise the skarga to the point of virobnitstvu. Vidmova at the reception of the scarga to the death

1. Warehouse To the Court, appointments are valid up to Article 13 of the 1st Rules, we accept the scarga until the sale for the mind and її of the deficiencies of the law, we transfer Article 63 of the 1st Rules.

2. The court ruled at the reception of the scarga until the care of the widows, as follows:

a) the scarg was filed in a special way, as I do not have the right to challenge the decision of the Collegium to the Court;

b) the scarga is filed after the completion of the line for the filing of the scarga, established by the CIM Regulations;

c) until the judgment of the Court of Appeal, decide on the acceptance of the skarga until the party has filed a skarga, it was necessary to fuss about її vydklikannya.

3. In times where the scarga does not appear to be able to transfer Article 63 of the Rules, that (or) it has not been submitted documents, transferred to the designated Article, the Court shall sue in full praise of the procedure referred to in paragraph 3 of Article 33 of the present Regulations.

Article 65
Information about the acceptance of scarga before the wedding, about the redundancy of the scarga without ruin, as well as about the acceptance of the scarga before the wedding

Judgment at the lines, that I don’t revisit 10 calendar days from the day of the due date of the scarga to the Court, remind the parties about the acceptance of the scarga until the due date, about the redundancy of the scarga without a change, or about the acceptance of the scarga with an additional copy of the copy.

Article 66
Restriction on scarga

A party may have the right to forward to the Court of that other party its listing for skarga, clearly up to and including transferring Article 38 of the Rules.

Article 67
Pripinennya provadzhennya for scarga

1. The court attaches provadzhennya to skarga, so as to establish that:

a) after accepting the scarga before the wedding, there was a fuss about її vydklikannya in the party, as if she filed a scarga;

b) the parties laid down the pleasing of the world.

2. About pripinennya provadzhennya for skarga Court at the lines, which do not revisit 5 calendar days from the day of the present situation, which have become a basis for pripinennya provadzhennya, to bring praise, a copy of which is enforced by the parties.

Article 68
Rows to look at the scarga

The court looks at the scarga at the lines, but does not revisit 45 calendar days from the day the scarga is due.

Article 69
Mezhі razglyadu in the Court of Appeal

1. The court examines the scarga on the basis of materials, which are on the right, at the margins of arguments, on the evidence, and on the records on it, which can be supplemented by the parties under the hour of the court review.

Dodatkovі evidence can be accepted by the Court, as the party argued the impossibility of their submission to the Board of the Court for reasons not to lie in it, and for reasons of recognition by the Court are more important.

2. When examining the skarga, the Court reconsiders, chi confirms the decisions of the Collegium to the Court, we will establish the rules of law from the right, and the evidence from the right, as well as the addition of the rules of law, which will establish the order of the judicial system at the Court.

3. If the party has offended more than a part of the judgment, the Court shall review the grounding of the judgment in the offending part.

Article 70
Submit for change the decision of the Collegium to the Court

1. Submitting for change or skasuvannya decision to the Court, scho oskarzhuetsya, є wrongly zastosuvannya that (or) nedotrimanya to the Collegium Court of the rules of law.

2. Incorrectly stating that (or) underestimation of the norms of law, which establishes the order of the judicial system in the Court, є pіdstavoy for change, or the decision of the Collegium of the Court, as a result of the violation led to the adoption of the wrong number of the ungrounded decision.

Article 71
Renovation of the Court of Appeal

1. For the results of reviewing the skarg, the Court may:

a) deprive the decision of the Collegium of the Court without change, and the scarga - without satisfaction;

b) speak in full or in part or change the decision of the Collegium to the Court, or to blame the new decision on the right in accordance with paragraphs 108 and 109 of the Statute of the Court.

2. The court also has the right to skasuvat the decision of the Collegium to the Court that it should be held by the parties of the world peace.

Section VIII. Sudochinstvo on the right about roses' clarification

Article 72
sudochinstvo

Litigation for applications for clarification includes the filing of an application for clarification, other documents and materials that are included in the application for clarification of food, or certification of copies of such documents and materials, as well as the preparation by the Court of an advisory document.

Article 73
Vіdmova at the receptionist declare about the rose'clarification to the conclusion

The court shall decide upon acceptance of a statement about roses and clarifications in the case, as follows:

a) the application does not comply with the law, referred to Articles 10 and 11 of the Regulations;

b) earlier, from the beginning of the court, the court adopted an advisory decision;

c) the application was made in the form of applicants not designated under paragraphs 46 and 49 of the Statute of the Court.

Article 74
Advice about the acceptance of the statement about the rose's clarification before the termination, about the acceptance at the acceptant's statement about the rose'the clarification before the termination

The court is on the lines that do not revisit 10 calendar days from the date of the due date for the declaration of the rose, inform the applicant about the acceptance or about the acceptance from the acceptance until the application is made (at times of the appointment - from the appointment of the decision) and with an additional copy of the decision.

Article 75
Preparing a statement about the rose'clarification before looking

1. Under the hour of preparation before the review, declare about the rose'clarification of the judge-dopovidach may have the right:

a) designate a number of specialties, which may be received as fahivtsі, experts for writing in the letter form of visnovkiv (dumok) at the link with the information given in the application;

b) establish a term for submission by fakhivtsy, experts of visnovkiv (dumok);

c) instigate other procedural actions, directing the food, put at the request for clarification, on a safe basis.

2. The secretariat of the Court prepares materials necessary for reviewing the food supplied with the application for clarification.

Article 76
Vіdguk declare about rose's explanation

1. The applicant has the right to submit an application for clarification, if necessary, before the adoption by the Court of an advisory decision.

2. Vіdklikannya declare about rose's clarification є pіdstavoy for pinning provadzhennya at the right about rose'clarification.

3. About pripinennya provadzhennya at the right about the rose's explanation The court at the lines, scho sho do not revisit 5 calendar days from the day of otrimannya letter notification about the announcement of the statement about the rose'clarification, blame the praise, as forcing the applicant.

Section IX. Acti Sudu

Article 77
The order of appraisal of the decision to the Court

1. The decision to be vindicated by the Court at the Naradchiy kіmnati.

2. Vіdomostі about zmіst podobrechennya when applauding the decision to the Court, about the position of the other judges to the Court as a secret for the sake of the judges.

3. The decision of the Court shall be accepted by the majority of votes in the final vote. The heady judge will vote to stop.

4. In times, even if the decision is praised, the Court recognizes for the necessary z'yasuvati new conditions, or additionally doslіdzhuvati prove that it may be important for the consideration of the dispute, as well as conduct an examination, obtain a specialist, the Court renew the judicial review, and praise it.

Article 78
Zagalni vymogi until the decision of the Court

1. The decision of the Court consists of introductory, description, motivational and resolutive parts.

2. At the opening part of the decision, the Court shall state the hour and place of the decision, naming the Court, what the decision was made, the warehouse of the Court, the secretary of the court session, data about the parties to the dispute and other points, how to take part in the dispute, the participants in the dispute, the subject of the dispute.

3. Descriptive part of the decision to take revenge on the Court if it could be positive, to list the evidence, or to recognize the statements it could, explain the positive, as well as other errors, like taking part in the dispute, set the dispute, established by the Court.

4. At the motivating part of the decision, the Court is charged with the norms of law, which the Court cherishes, prove, on which the Court is grounded, and bring, for which the Court does not accept any other evidence, including the evidence of a special group.

5. Resolutive part of the decision to the Court to avenge the decision to the Court is clear up to paragraphs 104 - 110 of the Statute of the Court on satisfaction, it could be positive, or about the decision in their satisfaction, or in the part, the provision for turning the mit, lines that order of the decision.

6. Decisions of the Court may be logical, not revenge internal wipers, insane positions. The decision of the Court is signed by all the judges, as they took their fate from one of the guilty ones, among them I think especially.

7. Reasonable and alternative decisions are not allowed to the Court.

8. razі Yakscho vіdsutnіst viyavlenih Court on pіdstavі stattі 45 tsogo Regulation torn down could not prizvesti to іnshih rezultatіv spetsіalnogo zahisnogo, antidempіngovogo kompensatsіynogo rozslіduvannya abo scho pereduvalo uhvalennyu oskarzhuvanogo rіshennya Komіsії, pov'yazanogo іz zastosuvannyam spetsіalnogo zahisnogo, antidempіngovogo abo kompensatsіynogo sunset, rіshennya The commission is recognized as such that it confirms the Agreement and (or) international agreements within the framework of the Union.

Article 79
I'll stop thinking

1. In case of disagreement with the decisions of the Court, otherwise, under the provisions of the judge, I may have the right to express a special thought when the decision is praised by the Court.

2. Judging by the protyag 5 calendar days from the day of the announcement of the decision to submit to the Court of Appeals in a letter form, I will especially think for getting to the materials, refer to that publication.

Article 80
Announcement of the decision to the Court, sending copies of the decision to the Court and special thoughts

1. The decision of the Court to be voiced at the court session by the head judge or the judge-addition after it is signed by the judges. Whether it’s for someone, if they take the fate of superechtsi, at the courtroom, they don’t change their vote.

For the statement of the parties, or for their own validity, the resolutive part of the guilty decision may be voiced.

For the obviousness of a special thought, the Court informs the Court about the duration of the announcement of the decision to the Court.

2. The Court, after the decision has been announced, shall make a copy of it to the parties, as well as to those interested in the parties to the dispute, that decision shall be posted to the Court on the official website of the Court no later than the day following the day of the decision.

3. At the time of receipt of the materials, please consult especially the thoughts of this copy to be given to the parties, as well as to the interested parties to the dispute at the lines, so as not to transfer 6 calendar days from the day the decision was announced to the Court.

Article 81
Resolution of the Grand Collegium of the Court

1. Decision of the Grand Collegium to the Court є residual that does not slander.

2. The decision of the Grand Collegium of the Court is gaining rank from the date of guilt.

Article 82
Resolution of the Board of the Court

Decisions of the Collegium of the Court є decisions of the Court that are gaining rank after the end of 15 calendar days from the date of the anniversary of the arraignment, as it was not convicted before the Appeal Chamber to the Court in the order transferred by Chapter VII of the Rules.

Article 83
Decision of the Appeal Chamber to the Court

Decision of the Appeal Chamber to the Court є decisions of the Court, gaining rank from the date of guilt, є the rest of it does not incur defamation.

Article 84
court order

1. Deciding the Court to sue at vipadkas, in front of the Rules.

Deciding the Court to be vindicated at the sight of a clear act, the Court was praised for the protocol.

2. Decree to the Court at the sight of a cleared act

A protocol decision may be made by the Court without exclusion of the judges from the court session, it must be voiced or entered before the protocol of the court session.

Decree of the Court at the same time as an act of the Court may be supported by the authorities, which are up to the decision of the Court under the Rules.

3. Decree to the Court є residual i do not incur a scourge.

Article 85
Advisory Board of the Court

1. Advisory bill The Court receives the majority of votes in the final vote and signs it by all the judges. The heady judge will vote to stop.

2. A copy of the advisory document to the Court is to be submitted to the applicant.

3. The advisory papers are transferred to the Court by the sovereign words of the member powers in the manner prescribed for the transfer of the assets of the bodies of the Union, with further placement on the official website of the Court.

Article 86
Technical pardons

1. The court, for the clamoring of the parties or their representatives, as well as the power of the initiative, may right to correct the technical pardons admitted to the Court in the act without changing the voucher, about which the blame is due.

2. Decree to the Court for the correction of technical pardons becomes an indispensable part of the act to the Court, before the amendment is submitted, it is added to the materials of the certificate.

3. A copy of the court's praise is enforced by the parties or their representatives, as well as to other persons, such as the direction of the act to the Court is compliant with these Rules.

Article 87
Roz'yasnennya decision to the Court

1. For the slandering of the parties, the Court gives a rose and an explanation of the guilty decision, about which to blame the praise.

Decree to the Court about the resolution of the decision to be blamed by the warehouse itself to the Court, praising the decision.

2. An explanation of the decision of the Court cannot change the validity of the decision of the Court.

3. Decree to the Court about the clarification of the decision The Court is to be blamed on the lines, which do not exceed 30 calendar days from the day of the due cries about the clarification of the decision.

4. A copy of the decision of the Court on the resolution of the decision to the Court is enforced by the parties, as well as by the parties to the dispute who are interested in the dispute, which sent the decision to the Court.

Rozdil X. Info

Article 88
Safeguarding the protection of information from the fringed roses

1. Information exchanged broadly includes confidential information up to paragraph 3 of the Statute and information exchanged broadly up to the legislation of the Member Powers and the rights of the Union.

2. When you are in the Court of operations with documents of the fringed rozpovsudzhennya, but live in, come in to protect the information of the fugitive rozpovsudzhennya, so that you will be safe:

a) preventing unauthorized access to information of a wide area (recognition of such information in particular, as it does not have the right to access to it, or the transfer of such information to designated persons);

b) timely detection of unauthorized access to the information of the circulating public;

c) constant control of the security of the level of protection of information of the bordered area;

d) non-admission on the technical side of the processing of information of the bordered width, after which the functioning is disrupted;

e) appearance of osib, as they denied access to the information of the obzhezhenny rozpovsudzhennya;

e) Paviganna Nalanczіonovannoyed fitting on the INFORMAYYY OF THE LOCATED WINDING (FULLY FOR INFORMAYA WORDS OF THE RULES OF THE RULES OF ZMINI INFORMA, SCHO, WHICH TO SPLUMENNE, PІDRBKI, SNESTING (MOUT ABOUT PET), ROSEKRADYNY, MOUNTED, COPIAYUVENNY, BLACKUNE ANNOUNCEMENT TO INFORMAKY reduction or failure of the functioning of the material carrier);

g) zabіgannya nenavmisnogo influx on the information of the bordered breadth information systems, Natural Javishchi Abo Introdi not hidden on zmіnu іnformazії DII, Scho watery to the spell, pivotchnya, sinner (Multi Pedetty), Ryskradena, Overbill, Cop_yuvannya, Blancher access to INFORMATSI, and Torzi to Put, Sinishnya Chi Zube Formantsi) ;

h) avoidance of the nautical inflow on the information of the circumscribed width (navmis inlet, including the electromagnetic and (or) other inflow, which is used with an illegal method).

3. Information is respected as confidential information, if the party is otherwise, as taking part in the dispute, which was filed before the Court, it was designated as such.

Documents that protect confidential information that is submitted by the subject of the state as part of the dispute, are subject to the signature stamp "Confidential" or "Commercial secret", which is placed at the upper right corner of the skin sheet.

4. The party or other person, as if taking part in the dispute, which gave the information of the surplus, may have the right to petition the Court for the determination (survey) of the number of osib, yak і may have access to such information, as well as about the supplementary measures and procedures to protect the order providing such information. Behind the pіdbags I will look at the fussing Court to blame the praise.

5. Courts, landowners and spіvrobіtniki Apparatus Court, individuals who take part in disputes, including experts from specialized groups, at the hour of knowing the information of the fringed roses all day, sign individual letters of goiter about voting.

6. Courts, landowners and spіvrobіtniki of the Apparatus of the Court, individuals who take part in the dispute, including experts from specialized groups, goiters do not speak out and do not pass on to third persons the information of the fringed rozpovsudzhenya, I will take away the letter from them from the process individuals, yak gave such information.

7. The information of the regional investigation is not disclosed to the decision of the Court, to the records of special groups, protocols or transcripts of court sessions and is not transferred to individuals, as they do not lose the right to access to such information.

8. The organization of work from the protection of information from the fringed rozpovsudzhennya at the Court relies on the Head of the Court.

9. The order of obіgu documents, scho to avenge the information of a fringed rozpovsudzhennya, is to be submitted by the Head to the Court.

10. At the discretion of the parties, additional measures may be established to protect the order of the submission of information from the fringe rozpovsudzhennya.

Document overview

The Rules of Procedure for the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) have been disassembled.

Vіn vyznaє order and mind the organization of activity to the body. Transferring the rules of submission to the Court, complete the molding. Fix the order of litigation on the right about the resolution of disputes, roz'yasnennya. I will relist the help to the decision.

The applicants are a member state of the EAEC, a body to the Union, spіvrobitniks and landowners of bodies to the Union and the Court. Vіdpovidachami – member of the Union, Eurasian Economic Commission.

Court of justice at the warehouse of the Great Collegium, Collegium of the Court and the Chamber of Appeal.

Acts of the Court are voiced publicly and posted in the official bulletin of the Court and on the site.

Volova L.I.

In today's minds, even the actual task is to assign the role of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union in the process of development of the Eurasian integration, for which it is necessary to deeply analyze the judicial practice of this judicial body, which is formed, with the development of legal sciences. Without a doubt, for the purpose of promoting integration in the Eurasian expanse, an objective and independent court is needed, which professionally judges the super-features between the participating powers, the shards of this solution without intermediary intersect with skin interests. The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union of Appointments for resolving disputes related to the rights of the Union, but in its legal acts there are no rules that allow the participating powers to evade the procedure for resolving disputes in other international judicial bodies for food, take them on the right of the Union.

It is even more important food for the improvement of efficient work of the Court and a clear recognition of this improvement in the sphere of ship rule-making. The creation of an effective mechanism of clouding by the Court of Rules of Law of the Union and international treaties in its structure and the manifestation of methods of its interaction with the national courts of the participating powers. But the main problem is the increase in the severity of the decision, which is to be blamed by the Court, and the recognition of the practice of effective methods of their implementation on the national level and on the entire Eurasian expanse.

Court Єvrazіyskogo ekonomіchnogo Union Je nadnatsіonalnoyu vessels to install, scho th zakrіpleno the courts rіshennyah, tse brought takozh i tim, scho access to Demba sub'єktіv gospodaryuvannya іz stated about oskarzhennya Act reasonably (bezdіyalnostey) vіdpovіdnih osіb zdіysnyuєtsya without realіzatsії vimogi about vicherpannya vsіh zasobіv Legal Zahist in the middle of the judges. systems of the country-participant to the Union. In earlier judgments made by the EurAsEC Court, it was assigned to go up to the hierarchy of international legal norms, the main functions of the Court were assigned, and a special method was fixed legal regulation integration agreements with international law and the right of the Union. Substituting for the beginning of the judicial process є submission to the Court by declaring the powers-participants or subjects of the state. Vіdpovіdno to the Statute and the Rules of the Court ЄAES vіn vyrіshu arguing, pov'yazanі s rightful Union, she accepts binding decisions for them, and the subject of the dispute can be a statement of the state-participant s food about the viability of the most international treaty laid down within the framework of the Union, Treaty, and also, food about dotrimannya be some power-participant of law to the Union, or food for the validity of the decision of the Eurasian Economic Commission to the law of the Union.

The subject of the dispute can also be oskarzhennya dії (lack of idleness) of the Eurasian Economic Commission, scho without intermediary zachіpaє rights and legal interests of the subject of the state in that case, as if it caused damage to the rights of the lord of the rights of the subject of lawful interests by the Agreement.

Russian international lawyers, evaluating the competence of the EAEC Court, express a general idea about those who have greater competence equal to the European Union Court, and that needs to be expanded.

Acts of the authors are important for additionally laying down special areas that expand the competence of the Union itself and that of the Court. Proponuєєєє, schob private individuals took away the right to zaperchuvati acti dії (lack of activity) of supranational bodies of the Union and participating powers, and the supranational bodies of the Union took away the right to attract the powers to vindication for the initiation of singing actions. There is a thought that it is necessary to change the order, which means that from the request for an advisory opinion to the Court of the Union, the right to be judged by the other powers-participants. There is a thought that the EAEC Court is responsible for the competence of the courts to decide how to resolve disputes that are blamed between the services of the Union and their robots.

Lawyers-internationals pay special attention to the importance of maintaining access to the sameness in understanding and maintaining the norms of law of the Eurasian Union, which include in their system the norms of international law, the law of the Union and the national law of the participating powers. The unity is secure with the decisions of the EAEC Court, the legal basis for the injection of this decision on the development of the right to the Union to pledge in the Treaty on the Union of 2014 itself, in the Statute and in the Regulations of the Court.

Unfortunately, the legislator did not show the possibility of a direct injection of the EAEC's positions on the development of the right to the Union, in connection with this it can be stated that the Court's position on the development of the rights of the Union is more than dictated by the practical dotality and interests of the participating powers. It is necessary to indicate that in paragraph 2 of the Statute of the Court, which is Addendum No. 2 to the Treaty, it is expressly fixed that, as a method of action for the Court, it is safe for one-man stosuvanya by member powers and bodies of the Union to the Treaty on the Agreement of the Union, international treaties to the Union from a third party to the decision The Union In case of such decisions of the bodies, the decision of the Court itself is included in the Union.

Sli_da Vaisa Odmіrno Court of Jesis Nadmіrno Court of Bagato Uvagi Patimna Dotrimannya Formal Vimoga at Visohennі Sporiv, ​​Filight, Evrazіyska Ekonіchna Komіsіyya Nadsilaє Larovyuchnyy Sub'Kt to court, and the court Vіdmlıє at Rozovdі I promoted, Obluntovyi Tsemogamovіdnіsti filed before її Provadzhennya. formalized. The situation is not effective, insulting the organs, calling for safety, however, the right to the Union, are left idle. In order to strengthen the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the subjects of the state and the destruction of integration, similar pidkhid docіlno change the way for the provision of special norms to the Agreement on the Eurasian Economic Union of 2014. but for the help of a thorough self ship practice. In order to create a single legal space for the Court of the Union, it is necessary to ensure effective cooperation with the supranational bodies of the Union, with the ranks of the participating powers and with their national Courts.

In order to implement the function of law-making, the EAEC Court, by its own decisions, to create rules of conduct in view of judicial precedents, and by itself, through precedents, form the right of the Eurasian Economic Union. In order to achieve the adoption by the Court of motivated decisions, it is necessary in the legal acts of the Union to find out about the hierarchy of the rights of the Eurasian Economic Union with the improvement of scientific approaches to fakhivtsiv in tsіy galuzі. The formation and development of the legal system of the EAEC can be quickly achieved with the right of access in this sphere of the European Union. I’ll only later expand the Agreement on the legal framework for the Union from the established hierarchy and the rights, the minds and the order of their acceptance and introduction into the game.

A scrupulous analysis of the Statute of the Court of the Union (Supplement No. 2 to the Treaty on the Union) to bring to the conclusion that the participating powers of a significant world have changed the jurisdiction of the new Court in accordance with the law, which is the Court of the European Union. Good luck with Ispolinova A.S. in that, the significance of the changes introduced by the Statute to the Court of the Union should be taken exclusively and less in light of the objective assessment of the decisions of the Court of the European Union.

If the structure of institutions within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union and the competence of this organization has not yet been determined, then the stench can and should be changed directly to the fullest. For example, the very order of formation of the Court was changed from the European Union, so that before the new court they began to be admitted to the settlement by the decisions of the Great Eurasian Economics for the sake of the submissions of the powers-participants zgіdno z p. Zvіdsi can be done nevtіshnogo vysnovku, scho order of powers-participant pobazhal to save control over the process of recognition of judges, even more so, that the warehouse of the Court is authorized to be blamed for the shameful fortune of the powers-participant of the Union.

It is impossible to wait for this, that the EAEC Court does not have the right to approve its regulations, which determine the rules of this procedure, to be confirmed by the Supreme Eurasian Council.

Also, at the Statute of the EAEC, it was agreed with the Court of the European Union, which, earlier than it was before, the competence of the Court was declared in respect of the consideration of private matters, which, among them, was held by the panel of experts, which are formed from the representatives of the powers for the examination of disputes about promissory sovereign support of the silskogo state, schodo zastosuvannya spetsialnyh zahodіv. Irrespective of those that the decisions of such boards are recommendatory for the Court, prote "at a part of the vysnovka about stosuvannya vіdpovidnih compensatory entrances in the laying of a special group є for the Court obov'yazkovymi when applauding the decision." In this case, the Court acts as a body, which, under its own authority, will make decisions adopted by other institutions, because of which such a procedure can be established before the appearance of different interpretations of the provisions of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union of 2014.

Analysis of the Statute of the EAEC Court to bring to the conclusion that in more than a few paragraphs it is assigned to the advisory jurisdiction of the Court, in which it is indicated that the Court, upon the application of the participating Power, to the body of the Union, clarifies the position of the Treaty, international Union treaties within the framework of the bodies of that country, and also for the application of spіvrobіtnikіv and posadovyh osіb organіv to the Union and the Court of the provision of the Treaty, international treaties within the framework of the Union and decisions of the bodies of the Union, related to labor allowances (Article 46).

Specially, the Statute stipulates that raising an explanation to the Court means giving it an advisory opinion, which may have a recommendatory character (Article 98). It has been established that the Powers themselves may designate, if the organs of the Powers will be upgraded before the Court for clarifications, however, the transfer of such organs will be narrow.

The national judges have been given the main job of stosuvannya aktіv Union, and the stink itself creates its own rules of denigration and signifies the order of stosuvannya legal norms to the Union. At one time, in cooperation with the Court of the Union and national courts, it was decided on a one-man basis to establish the norms of law of the Eurasian Economic Union by all national courts of the powers participating in the Union, calling for the creation of a single legal space on the basis of the rule of law for the Union.

There is a practice that the Eurasian Economic Commission (JEC) more and more often accepts acts, as if without intermediary rights and legal interests of physical objects, and not only enterprises, but if the Union is offended, the decision can be less. Tim is no less, the Statute of the EAEC, as before, grants the right to denigrate such assets only to “ruling subjects”, to which they lie legal entities and individual admissions. Private individuals-non-priests have been deprived of the jurisdiction of the Court, although their interests may also be violated by the decisions of the Commission. It is unacceptable to the Eurasian Economic Union, which has set itself as a metaphor for creating a friendly mind for all private matters. In order to achieve this goal, all private individuals may take away the right of court defamation without intermediary hundred and fifty percent of the decision of the Eurasian Economic Commission.

In order to establish a new stagnation of the rights of the Union, an important intellectual contribution is made to the interdependence of the activity of the Court with the Eurasian Economic Commission, which has been given sufficient refurbishment to conduct monitoring of one-man stagnation of the Union’s activities by all the participants of the integration process.

The Commission establishes monitoring and control over the violations of international treaties, which are included before the right of the Union, that decision of the Commission (paragraph 4 and paragraph 43 of the Regulations on the JEC), and the Council of the Commission assesses the results of monitoring and control over the violations of international agreements, which are included before the right to enter. .

The Eurasian Economic Commission for the materials of the monitoring, either confirms the fact that the subjects of legal norms do not apply, or establish the fact that they do not. The Statute of the Court (p. 102) conveys that the Court does not create new rules of law for the Union, the decision of the court does not change (or) does not casuy the chinnyh rules of law for the Union, the norms of the legislation of the participating powers.

How to see from the verdict, it is essential to bring, that it is necessary to have a greater exact legal force of the advancing rights of the Union: a decision about the revision of the normative regulator itself, and a decision about the inclusion of such acts, as a model law, what is the law, what is the law, what is the law? formulations of the norms of national law, which allow the accession of the legal systems of the participating powers to the power that are being considered.

Vrakhovuyuchi said above, in the Eurasian Economic Union it is necessary to reach the normative position in the hierarchy of dzherel. At st. 6 ABM Treaty Єvrazіysky ekonomіchny Union imposed perelіk i presented svoєrіdnu ієrarhіyu Jerel Union law, yak viglyadaє the following rank: Dogovіr about Єvrazіysky ekonomіchny Union mіzhnarodnі contract within the Union, mіzhnarodnі Treaty Union of third parties, the rіshennya that rozporyadzhennya Vischoї Єvrazіyskoї Economy rozporyadzhennya Єvrazіyskoї mіzhuryadovoї for , decision and order of the Eurasian Economic Commission, adopted at the borders of their new importance. More to the right of the Union Agreement as the main regulator between the powers-participants not to carry out annual gerels.

Privertaє respect, scho at Art. 50 of the Statute of the EAEC Court (Appendix No. 2 to the Treaty), for the purposes of the Court, another base has been established: the fundamental principles and norms of international law, the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, international treaties within the framework of the Union and other international treaties, participants of these parties to the dispute , the decision of that order of the bodies of the Union, the international one sounds like a proof of the infamous practice

In the laws of the powers participating in the Union, integration acts, such as international agreements, are not included in the legal system; 6 of the Treaty, as well as the rules for stosuvannya courts and sovereign bodies. The Eurasian Economic Union saves the situation, if the execution of some important legal power is taken over by the competence of the heads of powers. The very initiatives of the Presidents of the participating powers of the Union can initiate a law-making procedure, they also ensure the implementation of praised legal acts.

The Statute of the Court of the EAEC allows non-conviction decisions to be made to the Court of the Union. Vіdpovіdno up to paragraph 114 of the Statute of the Court at a different nevikonannya decision to the Court, the participating power may have the right to turn to the Greater Eurasian Economics for the sake of the method of living the necessary visits, po'yazanih z її vikonannyam. Vіdpovіdno to p. 115 of the Statute at the time of non-commissioning by the Commission of the decision to the Court, the subject of the state may have the right to return to the Court with fussing about living in the future. At the same time, the rest of the instance should be able to reach a decision to the Court. political body of Spіlka. Why is the Rada crying out before the president of the krai-participant of the Union enters, and, I’m sorry, virishuvateme about the share of the uncontested decision to the Court, and it’s far from a fact that the choice of the presidents of the krai-participant of the Union will be crushed to disgrace to the Court of the EAEC.

Vrakhovuchi, as the subject of regulation of legal acts, which are accepted by the bodies of the Union, for us before the government, and not be-yakі іnshі vіdnosini, such a procedure is hardly effective for the development of entrepreneurial activity on the territory of the Union. For the subjects of the state authorities, the possibility of incriminating the decision of the Eurasian Economic Commission from other aspects of the Court of the Union is not a real guarantee of the improvement of their camp as such subjects.

Oskіlki in the Statutory Documents of the Union did not violate the rule of international law and the rights of the Union, and the Chamber of Appeal tried to allow the decision made by it, declaring the rule of law to the Union, as it can be shaped by international law to international law.

The Eurasian Economic Union can encourage its own legal order to improve the established camp. Blame your first decision on December 28, 2015 for the scarf of the applicant - an individual undertaking Tarasik K.P. From Kazakhstan to the lack of activity of the Eurasian Economic Commission, the EAEC Court tried to transfer legal and political implications for the development of integration.

The universal assessment of the first decision to the EAEC Court was given by A.S. Yogo for tverdzhennyam, pozitsіya, vikladena in rіshennі Court ЄAES, nabagato realіstichnіsha, nіzh Wkra zhorstka pozitsіya Court ЄvrAzES, i bіlshoyu mіroyu vіdpovіdaє dosyagnennyu methylene zmіtsnennya spіvrobіtnitstva mіzh Court that ЄEK in power zdіysnennya control over vikonannyam powers Member Union svoїh zobov'yazan.

The cases of the first victory were rightly brought to the point that international judges for everyday situations cannot play a role similar to yours, as they play national judges at the borders of powers. International judges may consider especially the specifics that stand out from the fact that the stench is created by the powers for the implementation of special purposes, moreover, the participating powers themselves approve the rules of procedure, oblige anew, designate a budget, appoint courts, and also expand such tsі judge poklikanі tlumachiti and zastosovuvati.

Therefore, the EAEC Court can do everything to become an authoritative judicial body, which successfully ensures the unity and implementation of the rights of the Union. However, this Court still needs to bring its effectiveness, for which it can become a superior "protector" of the legal order of the Eurasian Economic Union. short model writing court decisions.

In the middle of the greater part of them, it is possible that it is necessary to take on the review of the evolutionary opinion before the writing of the judicial decisions, which means that they have strengthened the argumentation of the most important part of the motivational part. Doctor of Law Sciences A.S. Smbatyan is aware that the effectiveness of the work and the court is recognized, including, and depends on the assessment of the severity of the decision, which is due to him, from the depth of their justice, the argumentativeness and the logic of the evidence.

True, the legal argumentation of the decisions of the Court of the EurAsEC was not true high equalїї oshchennya y decisions of the EAEC Court to allow you to become a shanny body of international justice. Undoubtedly, the EAEC Court can commend such a decision as to allow it to be promoted to the activity of other international courts, which will accept the development of international judiciary. To achieve this goal, it is logical in the skin accepted decision to give force on the provisions of the fundamental international law, and also there, where it is necessary, the norms of specific rich-sided international treaties. Insanely, the appointed court of law is not guilty of acting as the basis for the decisions adopted by the Court, however, in the motivating part of the decisions, the Court, as an organ of international justice, can beat the argumentation with the provisions on the difference of the court of law.

The courts are responsible for helping to ensure the authority of the Court to know the balance of interests of all participating powers and their subjects of sovereignty, as well as to protect all the nuances of the laws between the participating powers, taxing mutually with the judicial authorities of the Union and with the sovereign authorities. Please wait for Professor Sokolova N.A. for the fact that “in times of stronger integration processes, the role of the Court will inevitably grow beyond the balance of what is called judicial activism.” However, for whom it is necessary to expand the competence of the EAEC Court.

It is also necessary to establish clear principles of interdependence between the legal order of the EAEU and international and national legal orders. In order to strengthen the integration, all three legal orders are obliged to work together one by one and serve the common goal - support of international legality and law and order.

The analysis is reconsidered in the fact that in the Eurasian Economic Union there is an urgent need to reach a single-mandate understanding and to establish the rules of law for the Union in the member states of the Union, which can be reached by the way of judicial clouding of legal acts. Professor Neshataeva T.M. that doctor of legal sciences Smba-tyan A.S. they argue that the Court of the Union cannot, in total peace, provide one-man right-wing protection and integration considerations, as the courts will not be held responsible for conflicting, important, well-thought-out decisions. Tsі fight fair doti, docks the Court of the Union does not vibrate its own model of judicial resolution of disputes and satisfaction with the filing of skargs, and also does not break up the clouding of the norms of international treaties and acts, broken up by the bodies of the Union. To whom we accept the accelerated process of incorporation of legal acts of the Union in the national law of the participating powers.

The court of the EAEC may have more than enough food, for which bodies the Union could not reach one-stay. The decision of the EAEC Court is the only legal way to solve deadlock situations, which blames the hour of the creation of sleeping markets different types products by the powers, which are the floorings of a different economic development. It is even more important for the zavdannya to reach the balance of the activities of the supranational and international bodies of the Eurasian Economic Union. The role of the EAEC Court as a judicial body can step by step increase, exhortations to establish equality between the bodies of the Union and the bodies of the participating powers, with the method of defending the rights of the subject of state activity.

The Eurasian Economic Union is an international organization of regional economic integration, as it may have international legal personality and is founded by the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, signed by the heads of the powers of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia2019

In the EAEC, freedom is guaranteed for the movement of goods, services, capital and labor force, carried out by a coordinated, narrowed down common policy in the corners of the economy, designated by the Treaty and international treaties within the framework of the Union.

The Union operates its activities on the basis of the following principles:

- the principle of the fundamental principles of international law, including the principles of sovereign equality of the countries - members of that yogo territorial integrity;

- owing to the peculiarities of the political structure of the country - members;

– security of mutual interdependence, equality and appearance of the national interests of the Parties;

- Compliance with the principles of the market economy and total competition;

- the functioning of the military union without change and the delimitation after the end of the transitional periods.

The main goals of the Union є:

- A creation of minds for a stable development of the economies of the powers - members of the mercenary advancement of the life of their population;

– exercising to the formation of a single market for goods, services, capital and labor resources within the framework of the Union;

- Universal modernization, cooperation and promotion of the competitiveness of national economies in the minds of the global economy.

The idea of ​​​​forming the Eurasian Union of Powers was first hung by the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev on March 29, 1994 at the hour of a speech at the Moscow State University named after. M.V. Lomonosov. At the heart of the split by the Kazakh leader is a large-scale project of integration of new independent powers on a brand new, pragmatic and mutual economic basis.

The innovation suggested that, in order to further improve the Spivdruzhnosti of the Independent Powers, a new integration structure would be created, the method of which would be the formation of a narrow economic policy and the adoption of a strategic development program. Інфольцію in єvrazіyskomoy Soyui Table, Zgіdima, the project, Ch_tkіsha Ta Rygornutu Issitzіinna Structure of the new іntgotsіyny O'єдднанна Ta Supplement Completely on the Keywords of Ekoniki, and Torzhetichnіyi, Relief, Reloviy, Ekology, Cultural, Oswiet Spee.

Evrazіyskya Ініціativa Nursultan Nazarbaєva, Yaka sounded on the pіku des_ntitzії, Bula Sprinka Ta Pіdtriman is far from Vіdraza - Adjevit Svitznennya National National Uncomfortable, that sovereignly, s one side, that Svetiki SPIVPRATSI, Z IS, at that time actually spat.

Postupovo sklalosya rozumіnnya of scho uspіh іntegratsії bagato in chomu zabezpechuєtsya viznannyam prіoritetnostі natsіonalnih іnteresіv, natsіonalnoї Nezalezhnosti that suverenіtetu, and she іntegratsіya became spriymatisya yak "vazhіl" ekonomіchnogo zrostannya i neobhіdna Umov for povnotsіnnoї realіzatsії quiet novih mozhlivostey scho sformuvalisya zavdyaki polіtichnomu "rozmezhuvannyu, what did you see? suffering states.

Bodies of the Eurasian Economic Union є:

Vishcha Eurasian Economic Rada;

Eurasian International Rada;

Eurasian Economic Commission;

Court of the Eurasian Economic Union.

Vishcha Eurasian Economic Rada (Vishcha Rada, VES)є the main body of the Union, which consists of the heads of powers - members of the Union. Vishcha is glad to look at the principles and nutrition of the activity of the Union, designate a strategy, directly and prospects for the development of integration and take decisions, directed towards the implementation of the goals of the Union.

The decisions and arrangements of the Greater Eurasian Economics for the sake of acceptance are accepted by consensus. For the sake of Vishchoy's decision, they are victorious by the powers - members of the order, transferred by their national legislation.

Meetings of Vishchoi for the sake of being held at least once per river. For the sake of arrogant power of activity to the Union of initiatives, whether it be from the member states, or for the sake of Golovi Vishchoi, for the sake of Vishchoi, they can call for later meetings for Vishchoi sake.

Eurasian International Rada(Mіzhuryadova Rada) is the body of the Union, which consists of the heads of the units of the member states. Mіzhuryadova is happy to ensure the implementation and control of the implementation of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, international agreements within the framework of the Union and for the sake of Vishchoi; looking at the proposition For the sake of the Committee of Nutrition, for which no consensus has been reached; give the handover to the Commission, as well as zdiisnyuє іnshі novovazhennya, transferred by the Treaty on the EAEC and international treaties at the borders of the Union. For the sake of decision and regulation of the Eurasian Mіzhuryadova, they are accepted by consensus and imposed by the powers - members of the order, transferred by their national legislation.

Meetings of Mіzhuryadova for the sake of being held for the sake of necessity, but not more than 2 times on the river. For the sake of arrogant power of the Union of initiatives, whether it be from the member states, or for the sake of Golovi Mіzhuryadova, for the sake of the future, the meeting of Mіzhuryadova can be called for.

Eurasian Economic Commission- Permanent regulatory body to the Union. The commission is formed for the sake of that Collegium. The Commission takes a decision on how to make the normative-legal nature of ob'yazkovі for the powers - members, order, what can be organizational and ordering nature, and recommendations, not to make ob'ov'yazkovy character. Decisions of the Commission to enter the right of the Union and to impose an uninterrupted stagnation on the territories of the member states.

Decisions, orders and recommendations for the sake of the Eurasian Economic Commission are accepted by consensus. Decisions, orders and recommendations of the Board of the JEC are accepted by a qualified majority (2/3 votes in the total number of members of the Board) and by consensus (from sensitive nutrition, the translation of these votes is VEC).

The commission has been redeemed from Moscow.

Court of the Eurasian Economic Union -є permanent judicial body of the Eurasian Economic Union.

Mean of the Court's activity is the provision of single-mandate signing by the member powers and bodies of the Union to the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, international treaties within the framework of the Union, international treaties to the Union with a third party and the decision of the bodies of the Union. The court considers the super-features that are blamed for the implementation of the EAEU Treaty, international treaties within the framework of the Union and (or) the decisions of the bodies of the Union at the request of the state - a member, or at the request of the subject of the state. Based on the results of reviewing the disputes for the application of a member state, the Court shall issue a decision, obliging the parties to the dispute for review. Based on the results of the examination of the disputes for the application of the subject of the state, the Court shall issue a decision, obov'yazkove for the Commission.

Before the warehouse of the Court enter two courts per member state, which are assigned to the land by the Supreme Eurasian Economic Rada for the filings of the member states in a row for nine years. The court is examined at the warehouse of the Grand Collegium of the Court, the Collegium of the Court and the Court of Appeal.

Court of the EAEC for settlements near Minsk.

International agreements within the framework of the Union, international agreements with a third party, and the decision of the bodies of the Union are subject to official publication on the official website of the Union on the Internet in accordance with the procedure established by the International Rada.

Organizations of the Union shall ensure the early publication of draft decisions on the official website of the Union in the Internet, at least 30 calendar days before the date, if the decision is planned to be adopted. Draft decisions of the bodies of the Union, which are accepted in vinyatkovyh cases, which require prompt response, can be published in other terms. Clogged individuals can submit their comments and propositions to this body.

In addition, due to the safety of transparency, the decision of the Commission has been transferred, that the decisions of the Commission, if they can be included in the mind of the decision to accept the action, are taken from the assessment of the regulatory impact of projects of such decisions.

The financing of the activities of the bodies of the Union is charged for the expenses of the budget of the Union, which is formed in the manner prescribed by the regulations on the budget of the Union. The budget of the Union is formed in Russian rubles with the help of shareholding foreign powers - members.

Regulations on the budget of the Eurasian Economic Union, as well as the budget of the Union, and the same is true about the yogo vikonannya. Vіn vyznaє rozmіri (scale) share vneskіv powers - members to the budget of the Union.

Contractor about єAES - M_International Treaty MІZPLIKOKU IPRYUK, PRYUBLIKOE Kazakhstan TA ROSІYSKOE TO FEDERY, PІDPISSIONS OF THE CHILDREN OF POWERS IN ASTANA 29 PERSON 2014 ROCK, SHIPM IS FROM YOURSIKY EKONIKHNYY UNION, ON THE PERSON OF PLEASURE FREEDY RUKHOVA TVOVOV, SERVOD, CAPITALIVA, uzgodzhenoy chi common policy in the economy, appointed by the Treaty and international treaties within the framework of the Union. The agreement about ЄАES to avenge the provisions, which transfer the speedy evacuation of those other borders, including bar'eriv, to mutual access of subjects of sub-principal activities to the market of the member states. The EAEC Treaty is based on the contractual and legal basis of the Mitny Union and the Common Economic Space, the norms that have been updated and brought to the rules of the SOT.

The agreement about the EAEC is composed of 4 parts, 28 divisions, 118 articles, and 33 additions.

The document can be subdivided into two parts with a halter.

Persiyi Speed, Istanzіchnіynіy, Vinogenin Strategiggіchnі Tsіlі Tu Tutdannya єvrazіyskiї инторції, visnacheno the legal status of the Union of Yak M_Inzіzіzіzіїzії, formulso the basic principle, Tsіlі, Compets of the right union, the system of the Organ Union, ї Competetiya, Order of the formation of Ta Robota about the budget of the Union.

The other part, the functional (economical), is regulated by the mechanisms of economic interaction, as well as the fixation of goiters and their direct integration. Among them, there is a single trade policy and a policy in the field of technical regulation, macroeconomic and monetary policy are adjusted, policies in the transport and energy sectors are coordinated (coordinated), agro-industrial policy is adjusted (coordinated), industrial policy is improved, and employment policy is defending the rights of the peaceful

The Eurasian Economic Union is open to the entry of any power, which shares its goals and principles, on the minds, pleasing the powers-members.

To win back the status of a power candidate for joining the Union, the state is interested in the power of vigilance in the name of Golovya Vishchoy for the Eurasian economic sake.

The decision about the state's status as a candidate power to join the Union is accepted by the Supreme Eurasian Economic Rada by consensus.

The Eurasian Economic Commission is the permanent regulatory body of the Union. The commission is formed for the sake of that Collegium.

The main tasks of the Commission are to ensure the functioning and development of the Union, as well as the development of propositions in the sphere of economic integration.

The Commission establishes its activity on the basis of the following principles:

- Security of mutual benefit, equality and appearance of the national interests of the Member States;

– economic priming decisions taken;

- Openness, publicity and objectivity.

The improvement of the Commission by the EAEC Treaty and other international treaties within the framework of the Union is expanding in the following areas:

1) fixed-tariff and non-tariff regulation;

2) mitne regulation;

3) technical regulation;

4) sanitary, veterinary and sanitary and quarantine phytosanitary entries;

5) zarahuvannya and rozpodіl of imported mites;

6) establishment of trade regimes for third parties;

7) statistics of current and mutual trade;

8) macroeconomic policy;

9) competitive policy;

10) industrial and agricultural subsidies;

11) energy policy;

12) natural monopolies;

13) state and (or) municipal purchases;

14) mutual trade in services and investments;

15) transport and transportation;

16) currency policy;

17) intellectual power;

18) labor migration;

19) financial markets (banking, insurance, foreign exchange market, paper market);

20) other areas designated by the Treaty and international treaties at the borders of the Union.

Marks are given to pickers without cost. The cost of placing RFID tags is set from 15 to 22 rubles. Less, lower ticket for travel by the bus. Іstotno on kіntsevu vartіst goods vikoristannya mіtok not vpline. Ale to defend against smuggled products and "sirih virobnikiv", as if they were supplying inaccurate goods.

Vіdpovіdno until the Agreement on ЄАES work with assessment of viability established by the technical regulations of the Union, we can grant organizations from certification, testing laboratories, which are included in the Unified Register of Authorities with assessment of viability of ЄАES.

The new norm is expanding only on cars, which can be imported into the EAEC, or they will be in the new. The coexistence of foreign cars, which “bigali” on the roads of the Union until September 1, 2017, without the “alarm button”, is operated without change. The priority is the health and safety of the citizens of the Union. The same will be supplied in the EU from April 2018. A lot of light brands have already been installed on their cars for weekly emergency services.

Insurance contributions for obligatory medical insurance The Federal Fund for obligatory medical insurance of Russia is paid by robot providers.

EAEC. Unfortunately, the abbreviation ЄАЭС is accepted for all official international documents.