What to bring Gogol's heroes to helpers of dead souls. What to bring all the helpers of the heroes of the dead souls
"Dead Souls" - a novel, I'll sing names. Postiyny bag of modern anthologies from Russian literature. Tvіr classics, which today is so topical and relevant, like the second century ago.“Try to guess in detail the plot and finale of Dubrovsky,” respecting one of the previous ones. - Tse richly folded, lower forget butt one assistant from "Dead Souls". Indeed, in the creation of the characters, sing Gogol, showing an unfamiliar mastery.
Manilov, Sobakevich, Nozdryov, Korobochka, Plyushkin... These names have become nominal. It looks like something unnatural: can one put one of these different characters in one row? Try to date short description helpers from Dead Souls.
Manilov - philanthropist, projector, ledar. Sobakevich is a misanthrope, a fist, a vipal. Nіzdrev - shahrai, kartyar, marnotratnik. The box is a prude, stupid. Plushkin is a sknar, a hater, a hoarder. Yaki different characteristics, isn't it true?
In my opinion, the characters of the assistants are described in such a way that they make bets for the prosthesis: Manilov - Sobakevich, Nozdrev - Plyushkin. The only caregiver at the house - the Box - looks like a lanka between them.
It would be natural, yakby negative figures of one character were vrivnovazhuvalis positive figures of the other. But it’s not so hard to rob Gogol: Manilov’s empty philanthropy is clearly opposed to Sobakevich’s misanthropy, Nozdryov’s wild waste of money - shalen addiction to Plyushkin’s accumulation. The leather helper is a kind of poachal іlustration, “a person-addiction”, so that an instillation of a well-taken negative quality. Whom has all the structural semblance of the characters in Dead Souls. Approximately like the images of comedy to classicism. For example, in Molière: Tartuffe is a hypocrite, Jourdain is a bad self-lover, etc.
Gogol created at the hour, if the method of critical realism was born, which became a logical continuation of enlightened classicism. The new artistic method gave the opportunity to explore in detail the characters of the heroes, and to work in depth. However, on the material of "Dead Souls" it is remembered that Gogol was not ready to
Social vysnovki, as they tried to bring the radyansk literary scholars. Yet “Rus” is abstract, until Gogol does not feel like writing, nothing else, like a utopia, foretold by the writer himself from distant Italy. At the same time, which is especially cіkavo, the image of the helpers is folded like a dystopia, as it bears little resemblance to the real picture of the Russian life of that era. The helpers of "Dead Souls" - tse exotic creations of the written language, the stench could be more than prototypes in the distance. Here there is a commemoration of the difference between the images of helpers, who swear by this world of shkodi, as if the skin of them is the building manager of the welfare. Manilov and Sobakevich themselves are not shy. Only the impersonal manilovs and sobakovichiv zdatnі zavdat skіlki-nebud pomіtnyh zbіtkіv: the first - their lack of statehood, others - greed. But the axis of Nozdryov and Plyushkin is not like that. The stench is an active ruinous force. Plyushkin's stingy butt, "a bug in the people", can be contagious in society, de exploitation of a person by a person and there are no firm moral bases. Nozdryov with his pathological predilection for gris in all of them is more unsafe: for him there is nothing holy, and his butt is richly contagious, the lower butt of Plyushkin. Respectfully, in Russia in the 19th century, gambling among the nobility led to the ruin of the richest maetkiv.
Vtіm, all the world is more - just one of the possible points of dawn qiu topic. But it’s not forgotten that Gogol has gained great respect for the didactic significance of his sing, wanting to win is unlikely to be recognized for food “What is the sleep of Gogol’s assistants and why the stench is not similar one to one?”
Vidpovid vіd Kukuruzinka!!!
Manilov and Sobakevich at N. V. Gogol's poem "Dead Souls"
Mikola Vasilovich Gogol is a talented writer and satirist. Especially brightly and spontaneously, the yoga gift appeared in the poem “Dead Souls” at the hour of the creation of the images of helpers. Characteristics of the heroes are similar to sarcasm, if Gogol denounces worthless people, but they are given the right to order the villagers. The author describes the days of helpers, їх, hour - spent, showing, in such a way, a picture of the complete fall of the rural states. It is especially noteworthy in the shirts of Manilov, Nozdrov, Plyushkin. Ale and the dominion of Korobochka and Sobakevich, who are given mіtsnimi, are truly lifeless. Gogol podkreslyuє as ekonomіchne, and th moral desolation of the landowner class. Pogіrshuyuchi theme of the spiritual disposition of the nobility, the writer can be divided with a description of the helpers in order. Vіn vede chitachіv vіd mіnіk mrіynik Manilov to “cudgel-headed” stingy box, vіd reckless moth Nozdryov to fist Sobakevich, who squinted, and completes the gallery of images of assistants Plyushkinim, “prophet in the people”. Let's look at two heroes - Manilov and Sobakevich, polar opposites to the image, but united by one scorched rice - stink helpers - krіpaki.
Manilov is a marny mriynik, who sees castles and marne projects. “Wonder at the door and the stakes, talking about those, how good it was, how to carry out a subterranean trip through the stakes, or through the stakes, vibuduvat the stone place, on which the benches would be hurt on the sides, and so they would sit merchants and sold various other goods, needed by the villagers. For some reason, a turbota about their villagers is visible. But it’s true that you don’t cackle in the camp of the right, don’t go to the fields and don’t delve into the dopovіdі of the clerk, the debauchery of the villagers. Tse bezplodny mrіynik, who live in prosperity and warmth, more corytes with natural law: to attract the work of the krіpakіv. The call of the wines is the reception of a person, maybe, we can’t get it for someone who is evil. In the army, Manilov became "a modest, delicate and conspicuous officer."
The author strongly supports Manilov's claims to the illumination of that culture. Ale, all the more lovnіshnі, nanosnі risi, yakі change from the protilege. Synovei Manilov, calling ancient Greek names in the Roman manner: Femistoklus and Alkіd, and at the same time it is not enough to say that he is a helper of non-illumination. Gogol gives an important detail, as he replaces a lot of side comments. "At the yoga office, for a long time, there lay like a book, laid with a bookmark on the fourteenth side, like a wine, having read two years already."
Sobakevich is a direct extension of Manilov, he is a miraculous master: everything is in a new garazd, soundly and hopefully. We know our villagers both alive and dead. Ale Chichikov calls yogo "man-fist". Everything that Gogol told about Sobakevich helps the reader to indulge in the spirit of the master of the peace. Vedmezha's strength, intelligence, impertinence of Sobakevich - everything is directed at those who see their income, no matter what. Sobakevich is good with the peasants, for he has vilified authority. Ale, if you see them, sell them - sell them alive, even dead. Yogo does not sound anything. At the sight of Manilov, Sobakevich miraculously sees the approach of the “new hour”, if pennies, great capitals are panned, and get ready for the future, so that you don’t be a stranger.
Khoch Manilov and Sobakevich are diametrically opposed one by one, but the stinks of resentment in Gogol's images turn into troubles. Gogol shows the ruin of wealth for Russia in a flash. Mi Bachimo, that not the evil Manilov is not the best, but he can sing for the spy Sobakevich.
Gogol's characters have outlived the writer himself and have survived to this day, but, unfortunately, they have not lost their relevance today. Dosi in the boundless expanses of Russia you can see such Manilovs (like they don’t give a damn about everything) and Sobakevichivs (like they live for the sake of ziska). And the best thing is that we will continue to succumb to their future fates.
"Dead Souls" - a novel, I'll sing names. Postiyny bag of modern anthologies from Russian literature. Tvіr classics, which today is so topical and relevant, like the second century ago.
“Try to guess in detail the plot and finale of Dubrovsky,” having respected one of the previous ones.
Manilov, Sobakevich, Nozdrov, Korobochka, Plushkin.
Qi names have become wild. It looks like something unnatural: can one put one of these different characters in one row? Let's try to give a short description of the assistants from "Dead Souls".
Manilov - philanthropist, projector, ledar. Sobakevich is a misanthrope, a fist, a vipal. Nіzdrev - shahrai, kartyar, marnotratnik. The box is a prude, stupid. Plushkin is a sknar, a hater, a hoarder. What are different characteristics, why not?
In my opinion, the characters of the assistants are described in such a way that they make bets for the prosthesis: Manilov - Sobakevich, Nozdrev - Plyushkin. The only caregiver at the house - the Box - looks like a lanka between them.
It would be natural, yakby negative figures of one character were vrivnovazhuvalis positive figures of the other. But it’s not so hard to rob Gogol: Manilov’s empty philanthropy is clearly opposed to Sobakevich’s misanthropy, Nozdryov’s wild waste of money - shalen addiction to Plyushkin’s accumulation. The leather helper is a kind of poachal іlustration, "a person-addiction", that is, instilled in a well-taken negative quality. In e....
Distributed: Literature
- Learn about learning about fuck the helpers, Reveal in them typical, which unites them with a gallery of dead souls, the current meaning of such is to understand, like “manilovshchina”, “nozdrevshchina” and others;
- Show the meaning, what you whit, eat;
- Continue the development in the meantime to prove the state of my mind.
Ownership:
- Portrait of N.V. Gogol.
- Portraits of helpers.
- Vislovlyuvannya critics.
Form a robot. Various models of co-operation are presented: collective, group, individual.
True, skin of us,
no matter how good a person would be,
as if delving into yourself with this lack of side,
with yakim delve into others, -
then you know in your own mind,
greater than the lesser world,
many elements of the rich heroes of Gogol.
V.G.Belinsky
Hid lesson
I. Organizational moment.
II. Work on the topic:
The topic of today's lesson is “Gallery of images of assistants at N.V. Gogol’s poem “Dead Souls”. The word “gallery” has a figurative meaning “long-term row, low type”, hence, the meta of our lesson - to know those skills that help N.V. leather with helpers, with whom Chichikov sings, he makes his own, sharply marked individuality. I understand the "type" and I also know. Type - the whole image, what to revenge characteristic rice be like a group of people. Living the word "type", we can take into account that power of the character, as it allows in a new way rich people I know. Before the heroes of "Dead Souls" there can be no middle ground.
V. G. Belinsky wrote: “It’s true, skin of us, even if there was a good person, I’ll delve into it impartially, I’ll delve into others with it, - then I’ll definitely know from myself, a larger and smaller world, rich in some of the elements rich heroes of Gogol”.
In this rank, the heroes of N.V. Gogol linger, on the one hand, the deep human significance, on the other side, - the helpers of the singing era and the representatives of the broad versions of kriposnitskoy Russia.
1. So, what, in your opinion, unite all the helpers, painted by N.V. Gogol? (Vіdpovidі uchnіv)
2. You presented different thoughts that helpers will come. To help destroy the knowledge of the information about the reception, like the victorist Gogol, by revealing the image of the assistants.
All the portraits of the helpers are given at the distributions, the distributions are in order. Why is there a sense of such a roztashuvannya chapters?
Manilov
box
Nozdrev
Sobakevich
Plushkin
Do the heroes grow in stages of negative vigor? Chi stink, heroes, presented to the reader by the principle of contrast? Sentimental Manilov - Korobochka is grounded, the selector Korobochka is Nozdrev's marnotrate, Sobakevich's kulak and dirks on the people Plushkin:
Manilov - Box
Box - Nozdrev
Sobakevich - Plushkin
Zrazkova's note: Gogol gave qi divided in order. The stateless helper of Manilov (Chapter 2) is replaced by the merciful gracious Korobochka (Chapter 3), the stingy Sobakevich (Chapter 5) is the stingy man of Nozdrev's life (Chapter 4). I complete the gallery of Plushkin - sknar, who brought his mothers and villagers to a complete ruin. Navit mіtsnі gospodarstva Korobochka and Sobakevich really lifeless, shards of such forms gospodaryuvannya already lived their life.
More with greater versatility in the "portrait divisions" a picture of the moral decay of the landowner class is shown. In the sight of a marvelous crook, who lives in the world of his dreams, Manilov, to the club-headed Box, in the distance to the reckless moth, to the lie and the cheater Nozdryov, to the chipped fist of Sobakevich, distribution of representatives of the landlord's world
3. We explained how the composition helps to understand the characters of the characters, their spiritual declaration.
4. Ale and mova heroes also miraculously characterize helpers. Gogol is embellished with a moving characterization, as if it were a device for expressing characters.
A reminder of the progress of the preparation of teachings: Gogol's powerful Bagatoshar characterization of the heroes: at the sight of their speeches, through the installation of people, through the power of language. At the promotions of Manilov, they are fighting empty zmist. Axis is one of the brightest yoga promos: “Of course, on the right, the life was good, for example, such a person, with such a singing world it was possible to talk about love, about the garne of setting, swear like a science, so that it destroys the soul , it would have given, so be moving, lad like that ... ”. Mova Manilova is similar to the new one. Such is the licorice itself, invisible, bezmistovna.
Mova Korobochki is primitive behind a splendid and form, full of words and twists of the rural space: їхнє, lower, schos, manenko, as if resting, a seagull will come, huskies will vanish, the assailant will be sneered. Characteristically, "father", "father my", with whom you go to Chichikov like a welcoming gentleman. For її promotions are characteristic intonations of skarga, unsungness, naturalness in the old-world assistant, like a wiser, that life changes.
Mova Nozdrova, as if he were himself, rejoices at the strimkist and nekerovanist. At a new word, one after another, without a string of bindings, without any logic: “... Lieutenant Kuvshinnikov ... Oh, brother, what a premium person! ... . Eh, Chichikov, why would you come here? Svintus ti for tse, such a cattleman! Kiss me, soul, I love you death!...”
Nozdryov has words without internal censorship - yak i vin, without internal control.
Sobakevich's speech represents a sharp contrast between Manilov's and Nozdrov's promotions. Sobakevich, it seems, "like rubaє". Yogo replicas are laconic, the words are rude. Vіn not tolerate richness, roaring phrases, inaccuracies in speech. At the end of the day, Chichikov’s promo about Sobakevich’s “unsettled soul” dead souls? Be kind, I'm ready to sell.
Mova Plyushkina nagaduє without interruption burkotinnya. For a wink of quiet vipadkіv, if Plyushkin hangs out his joy at the drive of the unstoppable far away, please more and more replicas, pierced by human feelings, yogo mova - sucilnі skargi: skargi for vigilance, for yards, for vtkachiv, for relatives. Yogo mova is transcribed with lail words: yak pika, bad, like a tree; fool, shahrayka, tubules, robbers; damn you bake, bezsovіsnі darmoidi. At the same time, when talking about inanimate objects, Plyushkin often changes with evocative and colorful names: liquor, decanter, cup, pennies, register. As a matter of course, as a mother’s helper, who is richly rocky with the villagers, there are a lot of common words and bells and whistles: bawl, healthy dulyu, got drunk, pidіtka, ehva, I already know.
5. Later, we were told, how the composition of that moving characteristic helps Gogol to better reveal the characters of the heroes, to show them to the outside of the soul. Let us turn to what has already been said and turn to food, for which the world has learned a lesson: what will the assistants, painted by Gogol, eat? I guess, your thoughts on the cob have also become dead.
Zrazkova's note: The stench stood before the reader as merchants of the villagers. The fact that the stench trades not in real, but in dead souls, does not diminish the poignancy of Gogol's painted scenes. Navpaki, vin zbіshuє tsyu gostrota. Come out, all the helpers, among those who have such "miles", like Manilov, are ready not only to trade in people, but also to drink on dubious favors.
I will become the representatives of the stench, that I will occupy the temple, the role of support. The stench is guilty of being illuminated, illuminated, active, reasonable, and talking about the interests of the welfare.
In fact, before us is unlit, surrounded by dwellings, the life of those who pass by an empty balakanina or an empty activity (a total lack of spirituality, the presence of high sponukane, dullness of all human feelings, the absence of suspense-core activity). Must stink - dead souls.
6. Tse our visnovok is with you. And how did the critics hit the food chain? Because of this drive, the thoughts of the critics were divided. Some people think that “there is no goodness, any bright thoughts, there is no sense of any human being in them.” ( G.A. Gukovsky. Realism of Gogol. 1959.)
Others affirm that Gogol's heroes are both good-natured and not vicious. These are “singular”, “middle” people, but they are created with a unique - Gogol - “sharpness, strength and size”; the stench of vulgarity, ale, to reconsider these critics, in the first half of the 19th century, the word "vulgar" meant "splendid"; Gogol showing "the zvichaynost of the splendid person".
(V.V. Kozhinov. Poema Gogol. 1995)
“Gogol to conduct Chichikov in a way of truly Russian people, the skin of them is epic to post. І Manilov, і Sobakevich, і Korobochka, і Plushkin - the stench came from the world of fairy tales. The stench is easy to recognize the Koshchiya of the Immortal chi Baba Yaga. ...Great in their passions and vices...and the biblical heroes represent Russia as a land of fairy tales, miraculous, absurd. Madness replaces it healthy eyes that tough rozrahunok. There is no norm here - less blame. Here, skin dribnitsa is important and taєmnicha. (P.L. Weil, A.A. Genis. Ridna Mova. 1991)
Vidpovidi uchniv: “I think that people are simple, how to live and at the same time. Plushkin and Box - stingy with a different world; Manilov and Nozdrev are mortals, if they are able to bring their thoughts into reality, then stench lies, so that you can lift yourself up at the suspense. And Sobakevich is a human being, as if he only thinks about himself that his benefit.
“I’m happy with the thought of Weil and Genis, because I’m working with Gogol’s assistants to create fairy tales: Plyushkin - Koshchiy Immortal; Box - Baba Yaga; Sobakevich - Vedmіd, scho vyyshov іz rosіyskoї kazka; Manilov - whale Bayun, who has acquired his kingdom from his sleepy; Nozdrev is a celibate nightingale the rose-beater. Names of the heroes of Gogol, yak i fairy tale characters, became nominal. So, just like the heroes of fairy tales, Gogol's assistants are simple and enlightened by the readers, which one turns into a childishness, if one reads about the evil Koshchei or the ungrabable Mikhail Potapich. Like in fairy tales, the important role played by the situation in the lives of the heroes. For example, Korobochka’s booth, in a way that’s zilla that vіdvari, in our eyes, it becomes the hut of Baby Yaga, and Plyushkin’s booth with yoga mustiness, vogkіst, saw - the palace of Kashchei the Immortal.
(Scholars prepared a letter of nutrition like a home letter.
Vіdpovіdі, yakі zbіgali z traditsіynіm pozdіvі, not prіvіdіvі here).
7. Gogol himself can talk about the typical nature of his heroes in lyrical voices. (Vistup behind the prepared study)
8. About those Gogol's characters typical for that hour, Pushkin's novel "Evgeniy Onegin" confirms. Create a scene for the arrival of guests on the birthday before Tetyana Larina:
With your guard squad
Priїhav tovstii Pustyakov;
Gvozdin, master of miracles,
Vlasnik Zhebrakiv;
Skotinini, it's time to sit,
From the children of a different century, rahuyuchi
From thirty to two;
Povitovy dandy Petushkov,
My cousin brother, Buyanov,
In fluff, in a cap with a visor
(How do you, obviously, know wine),
1st senior lieutenant Flyaniv,
Heavy plitkar, old shakhray,
Nenazhera, habarnik and blaze.
How are Gogol's heroes similar to characters Pushkin's novel? (Vіdpovidі uchnіv)
9. Ale appears, and the souls live like this type of people, like the heroes of N.V. Gogol. Why is the image of the helpers of “Dead Souls” so important today? (Vіdpovidі uchnіv)
III. Concluding speech of the teacher.
Later, lads, today at the lesson it was said about the typicality of Gogol's heroes for that hour and for ours, not without reason the words of V. G. Belinsky were epigraphed. Your thoughts have been divided, and rightly so: a bunch of people, a bunch of thoughts.
I wish you didn't look like these heroes.
Tvir Gogol N.V. - Dead souls
- What is the sleep of Gogol's assistants and why the stench is not similar one to one?
"Dead Souls" - a novel, I'll sing names. Postiyny bag of modern anthologies from Russian literature. Tvіr classics, which today is so topical and relevant, like the second century ago.“Try to guess in detail the plot and finale of Dubrovsky,” respecting one of the previous ones. - Tse richly folded, lower forget butt one assistant from "Dead Souls". Indeed, in the creation of the characters, sing Gogol, showing an unfamiliar mastery.
Manilov, Sobakevich, Nozdryov, Korobochka, Plyushkin... These names have become nominal. It looks like something unnatural: can one put one of these different characters in one row? Let's try to give a short description of the assistants from "Dead Souls".
Manilov - philanthropist, projector, ledar. Sobakevich is a misanthrope, a fist, a vipal. Nіzdrev - shahrai, kartyar, marnotratnik. The box is a prude, stupid. Plushkin is a sknar, a hater, a hoarder. What are different characteristics, why not?
In my opinion, the characters of the assistants are described in such a way that they make bets for the prosthesis: Manilov - Sobakevich, Nozdrev - Plyushkin. The only caregiver at the house - the Box - looks like a lanka between them.
It would be natural, yakby negative figures of one character were vrivnovazhuvalis positive figures of the other. But it’s not so hard to rob Gogol: Manilov’s empty philanthropy is clearly opposed to Sobakevich’s misanthropy, Nozdryov’s wild waste of money - shalen addiction to Plyushkin’s accumulation. The leather helper is a kind of poachal іlustration, “a person-addiction”, so that an instillation of a well-taken negative quality. Whom has all the structural semblance of the characters in Dead Souls. Approximately like the images of comedy to classicism. For example, in Molière: Tartuffe is a hypocrite, Jourdain is a bad self-lover, etc.
Gogol created at the hour, if the method of critical realism was born, which became a logical continuation of enlightened classicism. The new artistic method gave the opportunity to explore in detail the characters of the heroes, and to work in depth. However, on the material of "Dead Souls" it is remembered that Gogol was not ready to
Social vysnovki, as they tried to bring the radyansk literary scholars. Yet “Rus” is abstract, until Gogol does not feel like writing, nothing else, like a utopia, foretold by the writer himself from distant Italy. At the same time, which is especially cіkavo, the image of the helpers is folded like a dystopia, as it bears little resemblance to the real picture of the Russian life of that era. The helpers of "Dead Souls" - tse exotic creations of the written language, the stench could be more than prototypes in the distance. Here there is a commemoration of the difference between the images of helpers, who swear by this world of shkodi, as if the skin of them is the building manager of the welfare. Manilov and Sobakevich themselves are not shy. Only the impersonal manilovs and sobakovichiv zdatnі zavdat skіlki-nebud pomіtnyh zbіtkіv: the first - their lack of statehood, others - greed. But the axis of Nozdryov and Plyushkin is not like that. The stench is an active ruinous force. Plyushkin's stingy butt, "a bug in the people", can be contagious in society, de exploitation of a person by a person and there are no firm moral bases. Nozdryov with his pathological predilection for gris in all of them is more unsafe: for him there is nothing holy, and his butt is richly contagious, the lower butt of Plyushkin. Respectfully, in Russia in the 19th century, gambling among the nobility led to the ruin of the richest maetkiv.
Vtіm, everything is wider - just one of the possible points of view on this topic. But it’s not forgotten that Gogol has gained great respect for the didactic significance of his sing, wanting to win is unlikely to be recognized for food “What is the sleep of Gogol’s assistants and why the stench is not similar one to one?”
