The role of images of heroes in the table in the cherry garden. Characteristics of the play "The Cherry Orchard", analysis of the comedy
Dyuchi faces
“Ranevska Lyubov Andriivna, housekeeper.
Anya, її donka, 17 years old.
Varya, її priymalnya, 24 years.
Gaev Leonid Andriyovich, brother of Ranevskaya.
Lopakhin Yermolay Oleksiyovich, merchant.
Trofimov Petro Sergiyovich, student.
Simeonov-Pishchik Boris Borisovich, assistant.
Charlotte Ivanivna, governess.
Epikhodov Semyon Panteliyovych, clerk.
Dunyasha, rest.
Firs, footman, old 87 years old.
Yasha, a young footman.
Passable.
Station chief.
Postal official.
Guests, servant" (13, 196).
Yak bachimo, social markers of the skin role of conservation are on the list diyovih osib and the rest of Chekhov's p'esi, and yak і, yak і earlier p'єsah, the stink of a formal character, not numbing the character's character, nor the logic of his behavior on the stage.
So, the social status of the helper/helper in Russia at the turn of the XIX-XX century actually ceased to function, not supporting the new structure of the supportive vodnosin. With this sensi Ranevska and Simeonov-Pishchik, they opine in p'essi persona non grata; Today's life and recognition in it is not connected with the motive of the souls of the souls, that other people, and vzagali, be the volunteers.
At my heart, "thin, lower fingers" Lopakhin, yogo "thin, lower soul" (13, 244) author's characteristic at the list of diyovih osіb (“merchant”), yak rich in why zavdyaki p'єsam A.M. Ostrovsky's pridbala in Russian literature has a whole semantic halo. Nevipadkovo the first appearance of Lopakhin on the stage is marked with such a detail, like a book. The eternal student Petya Trofimov continues the logic of the inconsistency of social markers and the stage realization of the characters. In the context of the characteristics given to him by other characters, Lyubov Andriivna chi Lopakhinim, for example, his author's name in the poster sounds like an oxymoron.
Further in the poster are the following: a clerk, a kind of rozmіrkovuє p'єsі about Bokle and the possibility of self-destruction; peace, scho postiyno dream about nezvichaynu love and dance at the ball: “You are already a lower Dunyasha, - say Lopakhin. - I dress up, like a pannochka, and zachіska tezh "(13, 198); a young lackey, who does not show any respect for the people who serve as wines. Perhaps, the model of Firs's behavior is no longer consistent with the status declared in the poster, however, he is a lackey under the pans, which is no longer clear.
The main category, which forms the system of characters in the rest of the Chekhovian p'esi, is now not the role (social literary chi), like the skin of them is gray, but the hour, which the skin of them will feel. Not only that, the chronotope itself, embracing a skin character, explicating its character, seeing the world and oneself in the new. From the point of view of the dawn, blame the situation: the greater number of characters are not alive at the hour of the day, willfully guess about the past, or dream, to be straight in the future.
So, Lyubov Andriivna and Gaev watch the houses and the garden as beautiful and harmonious light of their childishness. To this very reason, their dialogue with Lopakhinim at another comedy is written with different words: you can tell them about the garden as a whole real object of purchase and sale, which can easily be done at the dacha, stink, at your own hand, do not understand, like you can sell harmony sell happy:
"Lopakhina. Vibachte, such light-hearted people, like you, gentlemen, such awkward, wondrous, I have not yet learned. You say you are Russian, your maetok is for sale, but you definitely don’t understand.
Lyubov Andrivna. What are we supposed to do? Navchit, what?
Lopakhin.<…>Understand! If you still believe, if you have dachas, then they will give you pennies in advance, and you will be vryatovani.
Lyubov Andrivna. Summer cottages and summer residents - that’s how it went, vibachte.
Gaiv. Absolutely good for you.
Lopakhin. I will either cry, or I will scream, or I will not be tired. I can't! They rolled me up!” (13, 219).
The reason Ranevskaya and Gaeva at the world of harmony of children were marked not only by the missus of diї, the author’s name at the remarci (“a room, like a child is called a child”), not only by the constant behavior of the “nanny” Firs stosovno Gaeva: “Firs (to clean with a shield) . Again, not your trousers were dressed. Why should I work with you! (13, 209), and the regular appearance of characters in the discourse of images of that mother. "Calm mother" to sip at the white garden of the first house of Ranevsk (13, 210); about the old man, who is going to Trinity to the church, he will tell you at the fourth act of Haev (13, 252).
The childish model of character behavior is realized in its absolute impracticality, in the presence of pragmatism and inspire - in a sharp and permanent change in their mood. Obviously, you can play in Ranevskaya's promos and innings, showing "an extraordinary person", like "supporting your own garrison, whims, I will deceive myself." You can indulge in її images that "obvious profanation of the role-playing way of life." It seems that the very lack of cowardice, lightness, mittevity of setting up a butt, that even better the child, mitteva change the mood to create a mustache and stupidity, from the look of other characters, that rich old comedy, that the system of the singer. In front of us are children, who have not become mature, have not adopted a model of behavior fixed in the adult world. For example, all serious try Gaeva vryatuvati maetok look like a gra from a grown-up one:
“Gaev. Pomovch, Firs (the nanny Timchasova is getting used to - T.I.). Tomorrow I need to go to the city. They promised to know one general, who could give a bill of exchange.
Lopakhin. You don't see anything. І don't pay extra bills, stay calm.
Lyubov Andrivna. Tse wine to marinate. There are no daily generals” (13, 222).
It is noteworthy that the setting of the characters one to one is left unchangeable: stink forever brother and sister, as if they did not understand anyone, but they understand one another without words:
“Lyubov Andriivna and Gaev were left in two. The stench looked like they were checking on the neck, throwing themselves at the neck one by one and giving a streak, quietly, fearing that they would not smell them.
Gaev (at the rose). My sister, my sister...
Lyubov Andrivna. O my loving, my lower, beautiful garden!.. My life, my youth, my happiness, goodbye!..” (13, 253).
Coming to the tsієї microgroups of characters in Firs, the chronotope of such a one - ce tezh past, ale past, which can be clearly defined social parameters. Nevipadkovo character's promos have specific time markers:
"Firs. At the end of the year, 40-50 years ago, they dried cherries, soaked them, pickled them, boiled jam, and, it used to be ... ”(13, 206).
Yogo passed - an hour before the misfortune, then until the sting of the krіpatstva. In times before us is a variant of social harmony, a kind of utopia, based on a zhorstko ієєrarchії, on an order fixed by laws and tradition:
“Firs (not feeling). And still pack. The peasants are for paniv, the pani are for the peasants, and now they are all broken up, they don’t understand anything” (13, 222).
Another group of characters can be mentally called characters of the future.
Maybutn Petі, Yak І Maid Fіrs, Nabuvyє Rice Socially Utopії, DatijornuTa Characteristics of Jaco, Chekhov not MІG s censorship Mіrkuvan І, ymmіrno, not hot_rku ііркуван, зазаганующиющий иски і сілі селічі стой ицільчисть итучный итвичный ищий true, for good luck, as it is only possible on earth, and I am in the first ranks "(13, 244).
Feeling the future, seeing yourself ahead of the day's dream characterizes Dunyasha. “I beg you, let's talk later, and now give me peace. Now I’m dreaming, ”- it seems to Epikhodov, who is constantly guessing about no more than a garne of the day (13, 238). Її mriya, like and mriya be-like a pannochka, like you’re looking out for yourself, - kohannya. It is characteristic that there are no specific outlines of the dream, but it is obvious (the lackey Yasha and “love” to the new one are only closer to the dream). The presence is marked only by a special attention to the confusion, we turn on the motive of the dance in the semantic field: “... and in me, in the form of dances, my head is confused, my heart beats, to Firsa Mikolayovich, and at once the official said to me, saying that something went wrong in me” (13 , 237).
So it goes, like Dunyasha dreaming about an unimaginable mess, Yasha dreaming about Paris as an alternative to funny and not right, on the other hand, reality: “This champagne is not right, I can sing you.<…>It’s not for me here, I can’t live ... I can’t see anything. Surprised at non-government - you will change me "(13, 247).
In the meaning of the group of characters, Varya takes a subordinate position. On the one hand, she lives with the right, mittevim problems, and in the other side, life is close to Lopakhin: “I just can’t do it without help, mother. Meni shokhvilini needs to work” (13, 233). For the same reason, the role of a housekeeper at the foster mother's house is now naturally continued by strangers:
"Lopakhina. Where are you now, Varvaro Mikhailivno?
Varyachi. I? Before Ragulinim ... I moved to them to pursue the reign ... in the economy, chi sho "(13, 250).
From the other side, at її samovidchuttі tezh constantly present bazhane future as a trace of dissatisfaction with today: “Yakbi were pennies, even a trio, even a hundred carbovantsiv, I would have left everything, I would have gone away. At the monastery bi shla” (13, 232).
Before the characters of the intellectual day, one can add Lopakhin, Yepikhodov and Simeonov-Pishchik. Such a characteristic of the present hour is framed by the fact that in the skin of the names of the characters it is its own image of the hour, in which one is alive, and, later, one, common for all things, the concept of the present hour, so it is, like the hour of the future, don't know. So, the hour of Lopakhin is the right, concrete hour, which, with an uninterrupted lance of the daily “rights,” gives a visible meaning to this life: “If I practice my work, it’s not clear, then my thoughts are lighter, and I’m here, don’t change my mind, now I’m alive” (13, 246). Nevipadkovo the character’s language is shown with words for a specific hour of the creation of quiet chi іnshih podіy (cіkavo, what and yogo future hour, as if you’re crying out from the distant replicas, it’s natural to continue today, in fact, already realized): “Me now, oh dear , in Kharkiv їkhati” (13, 204); “If we can’t think of anything and we won’t come to anything, then twenty other sickles and a cherry orchard, and all the mothers will be sold at auction” (13, 205); “Three days later we’ll work” (13, 209).
Єpіkhodov and Simeonov-Pіshchik establish a pair of opposites in this group. For the first life - bad luck, and the change of the character is confirmed (again from the same point of dawn) by Bokl's theory of geographic determinism:
"Epikhodiv.<…>And then you take kvass to get drunk, and there, marveling, it’s superbly obscene, like a targan.
Pause.
Have you read Buckle? (13, 216).
For the other, well, on the contrary, life is low-mindedness, zreshtoy - happy, like always correcting the situation, no matter how: “I don’t waste any hope. Axis, I guess, everything is already gone, having perished, already wonder, - the flood of my land has passed, and ... they paid me. And there, marvel, it will not be today or tomorrow” (13, 209).
The image of Charlotte is the most mysterious image in the rest of Chekhov's comedy. Episodic for his role in the list of diyovih osib character, prote, gaining supra-emotional importance for the author. “Ah, yakby tee was a governess at my p'esi,” write Chekhov O.L. Knipper-Chekhovy. – For the best role, they don’t suit me” (P 11, 259). Three more words about the actress, as if playing this role, will be repeated by the author of the trich: “Who, who is a governess in me?” (P 11, 268); “Write like this, who is dear to Charlotte. Nevzha Raevska? (P 11, 279); Who is playing Charlotte? (P 11, 280). Zreshtoy, at the leaf of Vl.I. Nemirovich-Danchenko, commenting on the rest of the roles and, without any doubt, knowing about those who honored Ranevska, Chekhov is still looking out for the retinue of importance for the new role itself: “Charlotte is a sign of nourishment<…>the role of Mrs. Knipper” (P 11, 293).
The importance of Charlotte's image is emphasized by the author at the text p'esi. The skin of the innumerable appearances of the character on the stage is accompanied by a roaring author's commentary, which stands out like a yogo ovnіshny look, so yogo vchinkіv. The respect (focus) of the author becomes obvious, that Charlotte's remarks, as a rule, are played in p'єсі to a minimum, and the popularity of more significant characters on the stage (say, Lyubov Andriivni) was not commented on by the author: її portrait.
Why is Charlotte's image a mystery? The first thing to do is not to be cautious, like a varto to grow up, arguing in the fact that the character's callousness is accentuated at once and women, and people's drawings. In this case, the selection of details of the portrait as a whole can be called autoquoting. So, the first and last appearance of Charlotte on the stage, the author accompanies the remark, which is repeated: “Charlotte Ivanivna with a dog on a lance” (13, 199); “Yasha and Charlotte go with the dog” (13, 253). It is obvious that in Chekhov's artistic world the detail "from the dog" is significant. Vaughn, as it seems, marks the image of Hanna Sergіїvni - lady with a dog - even a poetic image of a woman, quite familiar to Chekhov's prose, built on a truly deep earth. Truth is, in a quiet stage action, the detail takes a comical realization. “My dog and peas are,” said Charlotte to Simeonov-Pishchik (13, 200), calling herself an exclamation of Anna Sergievna. In the sheets of Chekhov’s retinue, the semantics of the doggie is even more reduced, however, the author comes across this variant of stage inspiration: “... the dog is necessary for the first act of hair, small, drunk, with sour eyes” (P 11, 316); “Schnap, I repeat, is no good. That licky dog, like a bachel, was consumed ”(P 11, 317-318).
The same first dії has one more comical remark-quote, which avenges the description of the character's good-looking appearance: "Charlotte Ivanivna in a white cloth, rather thin, pulled together, with a lorgnette on her belt to pass through the stage" (13, 208). Zvedeni at once, three guesses by the author of the details create an image that even guesses our governess, Donka Albion:<…>She was dressed in a white muslin dress, and her thin shoulders shone brightly. Golden anniversaries hung on a golden belt” (2, 195). Lornetka will replace the anniversary on Charlotte’s belt, imaginatively, like a “memory” of Anna Sergievna, for the very detail will be accentuated by the author both in the first and in the other part of “The Lady with the Dog”.
Gryabov's English assessment is characteristic and offensive: “And the waist? Tsya lyalka will tell me a new flower ”(2, 197). The detail is even worse to sound like a wife of a woman and in a well-known Chekhovian - epistolary - text: “Yartsev seems to be thinner, and it doesn’t suit me anymore, - write Chekhov’s squads in rows lower, like a miss, continue, - Sofia Petrivna Seredina she has become much thinner and much older” (P 11, 167). Such an explanation is given to the character of the character by inconspicuous quotations to rob the character of the character by insignificance, let's distinguish, let's ease the semantic unambiguity.
Remarque, which conveys another story, making the image of Charlotte even more complicated, to that now, when describing the old look, the author emphasizes the traditional human attributes of the character's dress: “Charlotte at the old chestet; she took the towel from her shoulders and straightens the buckle on her belt” (13, 215). Tsei described anew, but he could read like an autoquote, this time - with the dramas of "Ivaniv". The remark, which precedes the first day, ends with the famous appearance of Borkin: “Borkin at the great shoes, with a rushnitsa, appears in the deep garden; wine drink; after pumping Ivanov, going to the new one, stepping up behind him, kissing him in yoga guise<…>znimaє kashket "(12, 7). However, even in the front view, the detail does not become characteristic, shards, on the vіdmіnu vіd p'єsi "Ivanov", near the "Cherry Orchard" neither Charlotte's towel, nor the revolver of Єpikhodov so і do not vistrіlyat.
Remarque, included by the author in the third part of the comedy, navpaki, more and more (or combined) insults on the cob, fixed in looking at Charlotte earlier; now the author calls it just a figure: “At the hall, a figure in a gray cylinder and in karty pantaloons waving his hands and waving, shouting: “Bravo, Charlotte Ivanivno!” (13, 237). It is noteworthy that the cost of leveling - gra - on a human / woman cob as a whole was observed by the author in the semantic field of the character: and the swindlers swindle in human and female birth” (P 11, 294).
Exploring the whole dialogue of Charlotte in her own inner voice, which roams between the state identifications of the participants:
"Charlotte.<…>And the weather is good!
Їy vіdpovіdaє taєmnichiy zhіnochy voice, nibi z-pіd statі: "Oh, the weather is miraculous, sir."
You are such a kind my ideal ...
Voice: “You, sir, I have been worthy of you” (13, 231).
Dialogue to descend to the model of secular conversation between a man and a woman, more than one side is unfailingly named, the dialogue is continued with two women’s voices.
Another important thing to watch out for is Charlotte's behavior on stage. All of the replicas and chicanery are given by inconsistencies and not motivated by the same logic of other situations; The stink itself does not match the tim that is seen on the stage. So, at the first comedy comedy, she leads Lopakhina into a ritual potion, her hands are less on that stand, so with the help of wine you might want something more:
“Charlotte (holding up her hand). If I may allow you to kiss your hand, then we will help you on the elbow, sweat at the shoulder ... ”(13, 208).
At the most important for the author, another dіїsi, at the most pathetic moment of a wet monologue, about which we still need to say, if the characters decide to sit, thinking, involuntarily zanurenі in the harmony of buttya, Charlotte "distant from the swarm of ogiorok and їst" (13, 215) ). Having finished this process, you won’t be able to rob zovsі nespodіvaniya and not confirm the text of the comedy with a compliment to Epikhodov: you are guilty of crazy love of a woman ”(13, 216) - and here is the scene.
The third day includes Charlotte's card and womb tricks, as well as її іluzіyni sleddi, if Anya or Varya appear on the plaid. It is noteworthy that this plot situation formally encourages the action, unmistakably interrupting, distributing, evoked a single remark of Lyubov Andriivna: “Why is Leonid so long silent? What should I do to work at the city?<…>But Leonid is still dumb. What to work with the city, I won’t understand for a long time!” (13; 231, 232).
I, nareshti, at the fourth comedy, under the hour of the belligerent farewell of other characters from the booth and the garden
“Charlotte (take a vuzol, similar to a gorged child). My baby, bye, bye.<…>
Lock, my kind, my beloved boy.<…>
Meni is so bad for you! (Put the vuzol on the plate)" (13, 248).
Such a mechanism will induce the stage to introduce poetry to the Czech theater. So, the first duo “Uncle Vanya” included Marini’s remarks: “Chip, curl, curl<…>The line went with kurchats ... Crows would not have sipped ... ”(13, 71), as if to follow Voinitsky’s phrase without interruption:“ This weather will be good ... ”(Ibid.). Marina, as it has already been repeatedly blatant, in the system of characters there is no personification of people about unacceptable logic. For that very reason, I take the fate of the struggles of other characters with furnishing and each with one.
Charlotte also sits in a special place among other characters in comedy. The peculiarity is not only designated by the author, but more is said about it; it is seen and judged by the character himself: “Those people sleep greedily” (13, 216), - say Charlotte, and the replica is most closely related to the phrase of Dr. "People are boring" (13, 25). Charlotte's monologue, which reveals another act of comedy, explicating the singularity, how it is realized, in front of the absolute presence of social markers in the image. Nevidomy її vіk: “I don’t have a valid passport, I don’t know how many years, and I’m all right, I’m young” (13, 215). Invisible and її nationality: "If tato and matir died, one German lady took me to her and began to read me." Nothing is known about the journey of that genealogical tree of the character: “Who my fathers, maybe they didn’t stink ... I don’t know” (13, 215). Vipadkovoy that unconventional is seen in Charlotte's profession, shards of children in comedy have formally grown for a long time.
All other characters of The Cherry Orchard, as it was already planned to be more, included in the next ablution hour, unsurprisingly the motif of guessing what to expect on the future becomes the main one for most of them: Firs and Petro Trofimov represent the two poles of this self-consciousness of characters. For this very reason, "all others" in p'єsi vіdchuvayut themselves in a virtual, not real, chronotope (cherry orchard, new orchard, Paris, dachas). Charlotte is based on the posture of all the traditional manifestations of a person about herself. This hour is fundamentally non-linear: there is no past for a new one, and even a future one. She is embarrassed to see herself only once and only in this particular space, that is, in this insane chronotope. In this rank, we have been modeled by Chekhov personifikatsiya vіdpovіdі on food about those who are such a person, as a result, ball after ball clean up absolutely everything - and social, and navіt fіzіologichnі - parameters of yogo speciality, svіlnіtі yogo vіdm be-yakоїї їніноїніїї . Charlotte, in the first place, is left in this mood by the self-esteem of the middle of other people, with whom they won’t escape and can’t escape in space / hour: “So you want to talk, and not with Kim ... There’s no one in me” (13, 215 ) . In another way, there is absolute freedom in the form of mentality, which is imposed on a person by supremacy, the ordering of behavior is only to the power of internal impulses:
"Lopakhina.<…>Charlotto Ivanivno, show the trick!
Lyubov Andrivna. Charlotte, show me a trick!
Charlotte. Not required. I want to sleep. (Go out)" (13, 208-209).
As a result of these two furnishings, the absolute calmness of the character appears. There are no other psychological remarks, as if Charlotte’s emotions were marked as absolute zero, but other characters can speak in tears, bewildered, joyfully, slyly, dokirlivo, zniyakovilo, etc. And, nareshti, it is natural to know the completion of the light of the character in the singing model of behavior - in the free obigu, grі, zvichnoy and immutable to all other characters in reality. The purpose of setting up the world is to explicate її famous tricks.
“I work salto mortale (like Charlotte - T.I.) on your lizhka, - write Chekhov’s squad, for whom I’ll go to the third on top without a “car” already being a non-separating pereskodoy, - I flock uphill with my feet and, having drunk you, I turn over once And, having lifted you to the stele, I kiss and kiss you" (P 11, 33).
"The Cherry Orchard" - the pinnacle of Russian drama at the beginning of the 20th century, a lyrical comedy new era development of Russian theater
The main theme is autobiographical - a family of noblemen who are bankrupted, selling their ancestral mothers at auction. The author, like a person, who went through a crisis like a life situation, describes with a subtle psychologism the spiritual camp of people who are terrified to leave their homes at no cost. Innovation p'єsi є vіdsutnіst podіlu geroіv on positive and negative, on the head and other rows. They fall into three categories:
- people of the past - noblemen-aristocrats (Ranevska, Gaєv and їх lackey Firs);
- people of today - their representative of the merchant-priest Lopakhin;
- People of the future are progressive young for that hour (Petro Trofimov and Anya).
History of creation
Chekhov rozpochav work on p'esoyu in 1901 roci. At the link with serious health problems, the writing process was not easy, the work was completed in 1903. persha Theatrical production p'yesi crossed the river on the stage of the Moscow Art Theatre, becoming the pinnacle of Chekhov's creativity as a playwright and a textbook classic of the theatrical repertoire.
P'yesi analysis
Description of creativity
Diya comes to the ancestral mother of the assistant Lyubov Andriivna Ranevskaya, as she turned from France with her young daughter Anya. Gaev (Ranevskaya's brother) and Varya (her adopted daughter) are ringing at the railway station.
The financial camp of the sim'ї Ranevskys is approaching to total collapse. Adventist Lopakhin propagates his own version of the problem - to break up the land plot on the basis of shares and pay them off to the summer residents for a small fee. Mrs. gravitate to this proposition, even if for whom you happen to say goodbye to the beloved cherry orchard, with which it is tied a lot of warm good fortune in youth. Add to the tragedy the fact that in this garden, having lost її the loves of son Gritsko. Gaєv, having taken over the experiences of her sister, reassured her that her birth mothers would not be put up for sale.
The rest of the other part is on the street, at the courtyard of the mother. Lopakhin, with pragmatic power of power, continues to put pressure on his plan, but he does not give any respect to anyone. Everyone switches to the teacher Peter Trofimov, who has appeared. Vіn vimovlyає skhvilyovanu skhvilyovanu promov is assigned to the share of Russia, її to the future and torkaєє those happiness in the philosophical context. The materialist Lopakhin skeptically accepts the young teacher, and it appears that only Anya is able to adopt these ideas.
The third day starts because Ranevska asks for an orchestra for the rest of her pennies and a Russian dance party. Gaєv i Lopakhіn at tsimu vіdsutnі - the stench went to the place for bidding, de maєtok Ranevsky maє pіti z hammer. After a milky ointment, Lyubov Andriivna recognizes that її maєtok was bought at the auction by Lopakhinim, which does not bring joy to his coming. The family of the Ranevskys falls into the waters.
The finale of a series of dedications to the release of the Ranevsky family from their own home. The scene of separation is shown to the most powerful Chekhov with a profound psychologism. The song ends with a completely deep monologue of Firs, which the lords hastily banged into the bag. The final chord is the knocking of the sokiri. Chop up the cherry orchard.
Head Heroes
Sentimental person, sackcloth. Having lived a few years beyond the cordon, she called to a luxurious life and, for inertia, continuing to allow herself to be rich in the deplorable state of finances for logic healthy gluzdu may be unavailable. Being an easy-going personage, already unmarried in life, Ranevska does not worry about her own minions, with whom I will recognize my weaknesses and shortcomings.
Successful merchant, wealthy for the family of the Ranevskys. Yogo's image is ambiguous - the new one has pracity, arrogance, arrogance and rudeness, "peasant" cob. At the end of the day, Lopakhin does not share the feelings of Ranevskaya, he is happy, who, despite his peasant trip, could afford to buy mothers of the Lord of his late father.
Like his own sister, sensitive and sentimental. Being an idealist and a romantic for Ranevskaya's tempo, he sees fantastic plans for the order of the ancestral mother. Vіn emotional, rich, but at the same time absolutely idle.
Petya Trofimov
An eternal student, a nihilist, a promotional representative of the Russian intelligentsia, who fights for the development of Russia in words. In the pursuit of the "greater truth" of wines, love is blocked, vvazhayu її drіbnim and primarnymi pochuttya, chim zamіchuu zakohana donka Ranevskaya Anya.
Romantic on the 17th river pannochka, who ate the populist Peter Trofimov. Recklessly believe in the best life After the sale of the Batkivsky mother, Anya is ready for any problems for the sake of good luck, entrusted to the cohanim.
87-Richny old, lackey at the house of the Ranevskys. The type of servant of the old hour is reminiscent of the Batkiv turbot of his masters. Having left to serve your lords, navіt after saying the krіpastva.
A young lackey, who is put up to Russia with contempt, mri vikhati for the cordon. A cynical and zhorstok person, a rude old Firs, unchangingly put up to his dear mother.
Creation structure
The structure of the p'esi is simple - 4 dії without a subdivision on the okremі stage. The hour of the day is a few months, from the end of spring to mid-autumn. The first one has an exposition that tie-up, the other one has an increase in tension, the third one has a culmination (sales of the mother), the fourth one has a tie-up. characteristic feature p'esi є vіdsutnіst svzhny zvnіshny conflict, dynamіzmu, neperebachuvannye turns storyline. The author's remarks, monologues, pauses, and a deuce of uneasiness give the visuka's lyricism a unique atmosphere. Artistic realism p'yesi reach for the rahunka drawing dramatic and comical scenes.
(Scene from the current production)
In p'єсі dominated by the development of the emotional-psychological plan, the main motive force is the internal experience of the heroes. The author expands the artistic scope of creativity for additional introduction great number characters that do not appear on stage. So the very effect of expanding the spacious cordons gives the theme of France, which symmetrically evokes, gives the arched shape of the p'esi.
Podbag vysnovok
The rest of Chekhov's song, one might say - yogo "swan song". The novelty of this dramaturgical movie is a direct reflection of the especially Chekhovian concept of life, which is characterized by an extraordinary respect for the smallest, minor details, an increased respect for the inner experiences of the characters.
In the episode "The Cherry Orchard" the author imagined the critical roz'nanonosti rossiyskogo suspіlstvo his hour, this total factor is often present in the scenes, where the characters feel more than themselves, creating less visibility of vzaєmodії.
Social statuses of the heroes of p'esi - as one of the characteristics
In the rest of the p'єsi A.P. Chekhov's "The Cherry Orchard" does not have a place on the head and other rows of diyovih osib. All the main, navit are given by episodic roles are of great importance for revealing the main idea of the whole creation. The characterization of the heroes of The Cherry Orchard is based on their social manifestations. Aje in people's heads, the social camp already imposes a beat, and not only on stage. So, Lopakhin is a merchant, already far behind in association with a noisy and tactless huckster, who does not seem to have any subtle feelings about that experience, even Chekhov is ahead of him, that this merchant looks like a typical representative of this class. Ranevskaya and Simeonov-Pishchik, recognized as assistants, look even more wonderfully. Even after the claim of the strong right, the social status of the assistants was lost in the past, the stinks of the stink no longer supported the new suspension system. Gaєv tezh assistant, but at the interview of the heroes of the wines "brother Ranevskoy", scho nashtovhuє think about the lack of self-reliance of this character. With the daughters of the Ranevskaya Daedal, the greater-less understood. Anya ta Varya has a vіk meaning, which shows that the stench of the youngest characters in The Cherry Orchard.
So the very age of appointments and in the oldest diyovoy individual - Firs. Trofimov Petro Sergiyovich-student, and in the same time he is a student, even if he is a student, then it is too early to attribute it to the father, and at the same time it is ordered out.
With a long stretch of the air in "The Cherry Orchard" the heroes are roaming around the world, that character is described in a typical form for this kind of literature - in the current characteristics that are given by them themselves by other participants.
Brief characteristics of the main diyovih osib
If you don't see the leading heroes of Chekhov in a row, they are easy to recognize. Tse Ranevska, Lopakhin and Trofimov. Itself їhnє bachennia of its time to become the main motive of all creation. And the whole hour is shown through the shutters to the old cherry orchard.
Ranevska Lyubov Andriivna – Golovna heroine"The Cherry Orchard" - in the past, an aristocratic woman, as if she called to live for the dictates of her heart. Її the man died early, having left a bunch of borgіv. For the time being, it was seen by the new senses, tragically perishing its little son. Honoring yourself with wine at this tragedy, you will live in the house, in the kohantsa zakordon, which is in the reshti pishov after him and literally plundering yoga there. Ale її nadії did not cope with the peace of mind. She loves her garden and her mothers, but you can’t lie to him. It is unacceptable for her to accept Lopakhin’s proposition, even if the rich order is destroyed, in which the title of “helper” is passed from generation to generation, carrying in itself cultural and historical decay, inviolability and spirituality among the light-minded.
Lyubov Andrіїvnі and її brothers Gaєv vіvіvі vіvі usі the best pictures of the nobility: strangeness, generosity, luminosity, a sense of beauty, vminnya spіvchuvati. However, in modernity, all positive vibes are not needed and are turned over to the protile bed. Generosity becomes a non-gaming marnotism, stupendousness and vminnya spivchuvat transform into slobbering, luminosity transforms into marnosliv'ya.
On the thought of Chekhov, the two heroes do not merit in their feelings and their experiences are not as deep as they can be.
In "The Cherry Orchard" the main characters talk more, shy less, and one person - tsediya Lopakhin Yermolay Oleksiyovich, the central character, according to the author Chekhov’s thought, if you don’t get into the image, then the whole story will fail. Lopakhin of appointments as a merchant, but the word “businessman” would have been more appropriate today. Sin and onuk krіpakіv becoming a millionaire zavdyaka to his feelings, purposefulness and reason, even yakbi vіn bad and not illumined, hіba zmіg bi vіn reach such success at your right? It's not cool for Petya Trofimov to talk about his delicate soul. Adzhe tіlki Yermolay Oleksiyovich understood the value of the old garden and its beauty. Ale yogo commercial vein overcomes and vanishes the garden.
Trofimov Petro- an eternal student that "oblizly sir". Mabut, vin also lie down to a noble family, but becoming, in fact, a homeless tramp, such a dream about the charitable good and happiness. It’s too much to say, but not to do anything for the brightest present of the future. Youmu is so powerless, deep down to the point of mindful yoga people and pretentiousness to the moon. Vіn live less in dreams. Prote vіn zumіv zahopit Anya with your ideas.
Anya, Donka Ranevskaya. Mother deprived її under the guardianship of her brother in 12 years. To that at the pіdlіtkovu vіtsi, nastіlki important for the molding of the special, Anya appeared to be put on her own. Vaughn subsided best capacity, like a powerful aristocracy, Vaughn is naive in a youthful way, perhaps, so easily choked on Petya's ideas.
Brief characteristics of other characters
The young individuals of the "Cherry Orchard" nest were subdivided into head and other rows after an hour of their participation in the birds. So Varya, Simeonov-Pishchik Dunyasha, Charlotte Ivanivna and the lackey talk little about the mother, that light does not shine through the garden, the stink of the new chiba scho vodirvani.
Varyachi- Receptionist Donka Ranevskaya. Ale, in fact, the economy is in the bag, until obov'yazkіv such a turbot about the rulers and servants. Vaughn think on the butt level, that її bajannya dedicate to yourself the service of God, no one takes it seriously. Natomist її are trying to see the zamіzh for Lopakhіn, who is out of the baiduzha.
Simeonov-Pishchik- Such a helper himself, like Ranevska. Stay with the Borg. And yet, a positive attitude helps to make the situation better. So, I don’t think about living in the rain, if it’s necessary to rent out my land. Tim himself has overcome his financial difficulties. The wine of the building is attached to a new life, to the vіdmіnu of the master of the cherry orchard.
Yasha- Young footman. Having spent time outside the cordon, Yogo is no longer calmed down by Batkivshchina and inspire mothers, as if trying to get along with him, Yoma is no longer needed. The wonder of yogo head of rice. I don’t respect the masters, I don’t have any prejudice towards anyone.
Dunyasha- a young windy girl, as if you live one day and dream about a kohanny.
Єpіhodov- A clerk, a chronic failure, you know miraculously about. In essence, this life is empty and without purpose.
Firs- The oldest character, for some kind of strong law has become the greatest tragedy. Win wide attachments to your masters. The first death at an empty booth under the sound of the garden, which is being destroyed, is very symbolic.
Charlotte Ivanivna- a governess and a circus performer in one person. Golovne vіdobrazhennya declared to the genre p'єsi.
Picture the heroes of The Cherry Orchard united with the system. The stench is adding one to the other, by the same time helping to open up head topic create.
Creativity test
Social statuses of the heroes of p'esi - as one of the characteristics
In the rest of the p'єsi A.P. Chekhov's "The Cherry Orchard" does not have a place on the head and other rows of diyovih osib. All the main, navit are given by episodic roles are of great importance for revealing the main idea of the whole creation. The characterization of the heroes of The Cherry Orchard is based on their social manifestations. Aje in people's heads, the social camp already imposes a beat, and not only on stage. So, Lopakhin is a merchant, already far behind in association with a noisy and tactless huckster, who does not seem to have any subtle feelings about that experience, even Chekhov is ahead of him, that this merchant looks like a typical representative of this class. Ranevskaya and Simeonov-Pishchik, recognized as assistants, look even more wonderfully. Even after the claim of the strong right, the social status of the assistants was lost in the past, the stinks of the stink no longer supported the new suspension system. Gaєv tezh assistant, but at the interview of the heroes of the wines "brother Ranevskoy", scho nashtovhuє think about the lack of self-reliance of this character. With the daughters of the Ranevskaya Daedal, the greater-less understood. Anya ta Varya has a vіk meaning, which shows that the stench of the youngest characters in The Cherry Orchard.
So the very age of appointments and in the oldest diyovoy individual - Firs. Trofimov Petro Sergiyovich-student, and in the same time he is a student, even if he is a student, then it is too early to attribute it to the father, and at the same time it is ordered out.
With a long stretch of the air in "The Cherry Orchard" the heroes are roaming around the world, that character is described in a typical form for this kind of literature - in the current characteristics that are given by them themselves by other participants.
Brief characteristics of the main diyovih osib
If you don't see the leading heroes of Chekhov in a row, they are easy to recognize. Tse Ranevska, Lopakhin and Trofimov. Itself їhnє bachennia of its time to become the main motive of all creation. And the whole hour is shown through the shutters to the old cherry orchard.
Ranevska Lyubov Andriivna- the main heroine of "The Cherry Orchard" - in the past, an aristocratic woman, as if she called to live according to the dictates of her heart. Її the man died early, having left a bunch of borgіv. For the time being, it was seen by the new senses, tragically perishing its little son. Honoring yourself with wine at this tragedy, you will live in the house, in the kohantsa zakordon, which is in the reshti pishov after him and literally plundering yogo there. Ale її nadії did not cope with the peace of mind. She loves her garden and her mothers, but you can’t lie to him. It is unacceptable for her to accept Lopakhin’s proposition, even if the rich order is destroyed, in which the title of “helper” is passed from generation to generation, carrying in itself cultural and historical decay, inviolability and spirituality among the light-minded.
Lyubov Andrіїvnі and її brothers Gaєv vіvіvі vіvі usі the best pictures of the nobility: strangeness, generosity, luminosity, a sense of beauty, vminnya spіvchuvati. However, in modernity, all positive vibes are not needed and are turned over to the protile bed. Generosity becomes a non-gaming marnotism, stupendousness and vminnya spivchuvat transform into slobbering, luminosity transforms into marnosliv'ya.
On the thought of Chekhov, the two heroes do not merit in their feelings and their experiences are not as deep as they can be.
In "The Cherry Orchard" the main characters talk more, shy less, and one person - tsediya Lopakhin Yermolay Oleksiyovich, the central character, according to the author Chekhov’s thought, if you don’t get into the image, then the whole story will fail. Lopakhin of appointments as a merchant, but the word “businessman” would have been more appropriate today. Sin and onuk krіpakіv becoming a millionaire zavdyaka to his feelings, purposefulness and reason, even yakbi vіn bad and not illumined, hіba zmіg bi vіn reach such success at your right? It's not cool for Petya Trofimov to talk about his delicate soul. Adzhe tіlki Yermolay Oleksiyovich understood the value of the old garden and its beauty. Ale yogo commercial vein overcomes and vanishes the garden.
Trofimov Petro- an eternal student that "oblizly sir". Mabut, vin also lie down to a noble family, but becoming, in fact, a homeless tramp, such a dream about the charitable good and happiness. It’s too much to say, but not to do anything for the brightest present of the future. Youmu is so powerless, deep down to the point of mindful yoga people and pretentiousness to the moon. Vіn live less in dreams. Prote vіn zumіv zahopit Anya with your ideas.
Anya, Donka Ranevskaya. Mother deprived її under the guardianship of her brother in 12 years. To that at the pіdlіtkovu vіtsi, nastіlki important for the molding of the special, Anya appeared to be put on her own. Vaughn was declining the most powerful, like power in the aristocracy. Vaughn is naive in a youthful way, perhaps, so easily choked on Petya's ideas.
Brief characteristics of other characters
The young individuals of the "Cherry Orchard" nest were subdivided into head and other rows after an hour of their participation in the birds. So Varya, Simeonov-Pishchik Dunyasha, Charlotte Ivanivna and the lackey talk little about the mother, that light does not shine through the garden, the stink of the new chiba scho vodirvani.
Varyachi- Receptionist Donka Ranevskaya. Ale, in fact, the economy is in the bag, until obov'yazkіv such a turbot about the rulers and servants. Vaughn think on the butt level, that її bajannya dedicate to yourself the service of God, no one takes it seriously. Natomist її are trying to see the zamіzh for Lopakhіn, who is out of the baiduzha.
Simeonov-Pishchik- Such a helper himself, like Ranevska. Stay with the Borg. And yet, a positive attitude helps to make the situation better. So, I don’t think about living in the rain, if it’s necessary to rent out my land. Tim himself has overcome his financial difficulties. The wine of the building is attached to a new life, to the vіdmіnu of the master of the cherry orchard.
Yasha- Young footman. Having spent time outside the cordon, Yogo is no longer calmed down by Batkivshchina and inspire mothers, as if trying to get along with him, Yoma is no longer needed. The wonder of yogo head of rice. I don’t respect the masters, I don’t have any prejudice towards anyone.
Dunyasha- a young windy girl, as if you live one day and dream about a kohanny.
Єpіhodov- A clerk, a chronic failure, you know miraculously about. In essence, this life is empty and without purpose.
Firs- The oldest character, for some kind of strong law has become the greatest tragedy. Win wide attachments to your masters. The first death at an empty booth under the sound of the garden, which is being destroyed, is very symbolic.
Charlotte Ivanivna- a governess and a circus performer in one person. Golovne vіdobrazhennya declared to the genre p'єsi.
Picture the heroes of The Cherry Orchard united with the system. Stink add one to one, do help to unravel the head topic of creation.
Creativity test
Classical literature has few works of art, history of current dossi.
Create, written by Anton Pavlovich Chekhov, just fit qiu characteristic. In this article, you can recognize yoga p'esoy. cherry orchard» at a short distance.
The history of the creation of p'esi A.P. Chekhov "The Cherry Orchard"
The date on the cob p'esi bula was put in 1901, the first time was shown after 3 years. The creators have an unacceptable hostility of the author himself, like a vinickle under the deed of guarding the majestic population behind the fall of the sun, sadib their friends, as well as their hairy one.
Wild animals
Below is a list of the main heroes:
- Ranevska Lyubov Andriivna - hairdresser;
- Anya is a native daughter;
- Gaev Leonid Andriyovich - brother;
- Trofimov Petro Sergiyovich - "eternal student";
- Lopakhin Yermolay Oleksiyovich - a merchant.
Other characters
List of other heroes:
- Varya - Ani's sister;
- Simeonov-Pishchik - the keeper of the mother;
- Charlotte is a spinner;
- Dunyasha - servant;
- Epihodov Semyon Panteliyovich - clerk;
- Firs - servant, old;
- Yasha is a servant, a young lad.
"The Cherry Orchard" - a short zmist for diami
1 day
Podії v_dbuvayutsya in och_kuvan_ Ranevskaya. Lopakhin and Dunya are moving, at the hour of which the superechka is blamed. Come to the room Yepikhodov. Vіn misses the bouquet, skarzhachis іnhim, scho vvazhaє yourself in bad luck, because of what vin ide. Rest of the merchants, who wants to make friends with her.
Ranevska comes with her daughters, Gaev, Charlotte and her assistant. Anya tells about the trip to France, expresses her dissatisfaction. So she’s going to cackle, so Lopakhin chooses to make friends with Vara. On what її zvedena sister vіdpovіdaє, scho did not see anything, but in the next hour to put on sales maєtok. In parallel, Dunya flirts with young lackeys.
Lopakhin talks about those who sell their mothers for money. Vіn stands for such a solution to the problem: divide the territory into parts and rent them out for rent. Ale for whom it is necessary to virubaty the cherry orchard. Helpers with their brother are guided, asking for a riddle in the garden in the encyclopedia. A daughter is welcome to bring telegrams to her mother from France, but without reading them, she opens them.
Petya Trofimov appears - the mentor of the dead son Ranevsky. Gaєv prodzhuє shukati options for otrimannya pributka, kaky dopomіg bi zakriti zaborgovannostі. To get the language to the point where you can see Anya for a rich person. Todi Varya told her sisters about her problems, but the young sister fell asleep, exhausted from the road.
2 day
Walk up near the floor of the old chapel. Charlotte gives a description of her life.
Whenever you sing songs, playing the guitar, you try to show yourself a romantic in front of the Dunya. Well, there, at her court, I want to take care of the young footman.
The helpers and the merchant are coming. Vin also sells a sackcloth at the land plot for rent. Ale Ranevska and her brother try to bring up the topic on "nі". The helper, out of pity, begins to rozmirkovuvat about inappropriate stains.
Yakіv vismіyuє pіsnespіvi Gaєva. Ranevskaya guess her people. The rest of them razored її and changed it to another. After what the helper virisha turned to the fatherland before her daughter. Changing the theme of Lopakhin, she says about the fun of Varya.
Enter the old lackey from the top coat Gaev. Vіn mirkuє pro kіpatstvo, pіdnosyachi tse yak unhappiness. Trofimov is coming, who is immersed in deep philosophy and the world about the future of the country. The helper accompanies the priymalny donki, who betrothed her to a merchant.
Todi Anya talks to Trofimov. The one at his side romantically describes the situation in a few words. Anya shifts Rozmov to the topic of crime and to talk about those that people only talk about and don’t shy away from. Because of what the “eternal student” seems to throw Ani all that status as a free person.
Day 3
At the booth of the helper of the government, a ball, like Ranevska vvazha zayvim. Pishchik tries to know the one who will give you pennies. Ranevskaya's brother violated the collection of maєtok for the name of the tіtki. Ranevska, bachachi, that Lopakhin is getting richer and richer, you initiate criticism through those that Varya has not yet entered for a new position. My daughter swears that she’s only hot.
The helper is shared with a great teacher of the son of the one who asks the Kohanets to turn to France. At the same time, the gospodarka no longer thinks about those who vindicated. Trofimov is trying to reconcile, and won't do it for the sake of you to get a wife for. The embarrassed brother turns and begins a monologue with the one bought by Lopakhin.
The merchant praises everyone that having bought maetok and ready to cut a cherry orchard in order to continue living in the city, de pratsyuvali yoga kripaki dad and did. My dear daughter is crying, reconciling, that all life is ahead.
Day 4
A lot of bagmen leave the booths. Lopakhin, exhausted by the lack of timidity, climbs up to Kharkov.
Vіn propouє Trofimov's pennies, but you don't take it, rozmіrkovuchi about those that people can easily reach the lucid truth. Gaev became a bank clerk.
Ranevska is taken over by the old lackey, fearing that she will not be led to likuvannya.
Lopakhin and Varya are left in two. The heroine seems to have become an economy. The merchant still did not urge him to go for a new zamіzh. Anya says goodbye to her mother. Ranevska plans to turn to France. Anya chooses to eat to the gymnasium, and help her mother in the future. Haєv feel like we'll leave.
Raptom priїzhdzhaє Pishchik and vіddaє borrow pennies for everyone. Vіn recently rozbagatіv: on yogo land, yaku vіn is now renting, bіlu clay was found. The helpers say goodbye from the garden. Let's sweat the stench of the doors flickering. Firs is sick. Silence has a sound of sokiri.
Analysis of creativity and visnovok
Nasampered, the style of this genre is inspired by the bright contrast between the images of two heroes: Lopakhina and Ranevskaya. Vіn - zapozjatlivy, shukaє vygoda, there is - that frivolous windfall. Є th comic situation. For example, the appearance of Charlotte, the slander of Gaeva with the wardrobe is too thin.
Reading this book in the original, for the divisions of those words, and not for the short ones, I immediately blame the food: what does the cherry orchard mean for the heroes of the universe? For the helpers, the garden is the whole history of the past, just as for Lopakhin it is the place where the future will take place.
The problem of contrasts in writing on the stick has been celebrated for two hundred years by creativity. It is also worth the nourishment of the recession of prosperity and the setting up to the last versions of the empire. Porushuetsya food about those, as if there will be future lands on the basis of the local situation. The nutrition of those who are ready to celebrate and radiate, but only alone in the building, has been destroyed.
Anton Pavlovich Chekhov even richly commented on what was relevant in that period and lost its importance at once, so I would read the lyric to the skin. This tvir became the remainder of the creativity of the writer.
