Features of the conflict in comedy A. S.
"Likho z razumu" is based on the fact that the creators have an interplay of social and love plans. Conflict hiba scho nabuva dvoististnost. I. A. Goncharov at the article “Million of torments” wrote: “Two comedies, one contribution to our country: one, so be it, private, homely, between Chatsky, Sophia, Silent and Lisa - this is the intrigue of kohannya, the usual motive of all comedies. If the first is interrupted, it is not possible for the intermediary, and the day will start anew, it will be privately played in a separate battle, and it will be linked to one vuzol. In “Likho z razumu” A.S. Griboyedov rethinks the traditions, connected with the epochs of classicism and romanticism, which is expressed both on the level of creation of images, characters, movies, especially problems, and on the level of the conflict itself.
Traditional for comedy classicism, there is a plot scheme, where two young people lay claim to the hand of a noble maiden, the images of which are portrayed, moreover, one of them is singing in his perevagi, balakuchi and mockery, and the other is modest and shanoble; I have been named to love him, who can have the same kindness, and vin naprikintsi p'esi reach your hands. Having chosen this scheme, Griboyedov changed the interpretation of the characters, deleting their characteristics. In yoga comedy, Chatsky and Molchalin, who and may be successful, are clearly marked, moreover, "darkening and neatness" are the main features of yoga. In the period of romanticism, having created a traditional conflict, it is invariably a kind of buv, be it a romantic song, a drama. Vіn polyagav at the opposite high and low; vinyatkovogo that svіtla, suspіlstva, svіtu zagalom.
Tsej conflict buv nerazv'yazny. Chatsky, in his behavior and tragedy, is similar to a romantic hero, who fights with "zhorstok zvichayami". But the conflict in A. S. Griboyedov becomes historically concrete. So, you can understand that the era depicted in "Likho z razumu" is the era of secret unions, from one side, and Arakcheevshchina - from the other side.
Chatsky may have been richly sleepy with the Decembrists (love to the Russian people, bazhannya "serve right, not to persons", hatred to the level of strength, true and illumined, the capitals themselves"), but there is no strength, all the Decembrist suspense. Vіn is one against all. The insignificant conflict of "Hot in Reason" is laid down in the plot of the comedy. The first action is the exposition of the conflict development. report picture the life of Famusov and Sophia before the arrival of Chatsky, thereby preparing the background, against which we will later, with increasing force, break out the future conflict.
We know about the love of Sophia before Molchalin, as we know about Famusov, and about the success of the installation of Molchalin before Sophia (Lizie about the titon and the young Frenchman). 7-9 apparitions - the tie of a love affair, tied W The arrival of the deceased at Sofia Chatsky. Special conflict serve as an instant manifestation of a suspenseful conflict, which is guessed in Chatsky’s satirical remarks about Moscow sounds (already in the 7th appearance, Sophia began to respect: “Drive on Moscow. What does it mean to be bright!”). The tie-in of the suspensory conflict and the aggravation of the special line is carried up to the 2nd manifestation
Need a cheat sheet? Todі zberezhi - "The originality of the conflict in the comedy of A. S. Griboyedov" Dashingly out of mind ". Create Literary!In the p'єсі "It's famously out of mind" a sprinkling of conflicts, even as a necessary intellectual classicistic p'єsi, there was only one conflict.
"Likho z rozumu" - a comedy with two storylines, and at first glance it seems that there are two conflicts in the movie: Chatsky's love affair and Sophia and Chatsky's huge man famous suspense.
P'ysa starts from the beginning of a love conflict - Chatsky comes to Moscow to the Kokhanoy maiden. Step-by-step love conflict grows into a suspense. Z'yasovuchi, chi yogo Sofia to love, Chatsky sticks to famus's suspіlstvo. In comedy, the image of Chatsky represents a new type of specialness cob XIX centurion. Chatsky opposed to the conservative, ossified world of the Famusovs. In his monologues, vismіyuyuchi pobut, zvichaї, the ideology of the old Moscow society, Chatsky tries to squash the eyes of Famusova and everyone else on those, like the stink of living and living. The public conflict "Hot in the air" is non-strife. The old gentleman's society does not hear the willful, sensible Chatsky, they do not understand and deafen him as divine.
The public conflict in A. S. Griboyedov's p'єsі is connected with one more conflict - between the "nine times" and the "hundreds of years have passed". Chatsky is the same type of new people, he is the evangelist of the new ideology of the new hour, "the ninth century". And the old conservative suspense of the Famusovs lie down to the "century". The old does not want to take a stand and go in the historical past, but the new actively invades life, trying to establish its own laws. The conflict of the old and the new is one of the main ones in Russian life at that time. This eternal conflict occupies a great place in the literature of the 19th century, for example, in such works as "Fathers and Children", "Thunderstorm". Alec conflict is not the end of all comedies.
Among the heroes in the mushroom p'єsi, maybe, there are no bad people, the skin has its own life mind, that is a manifestation of life. Kozhen from the characters in "Woe to the Rose" knows what he needs in life and what guilt he is guilty of. For example, Famusov wants to live his life, not going beyond the limits of the laws of the world, so as not to give a damn about being judged by the mighty leftists of the world, such as Oleksiivna and Tetyana Yuriivna. To that Famusov is so turbulent by the jokes of a good man of his daughter. Meta life of Molchalin - it’s quiet, let’s go right, but it’s right to protrude uphill with service gatherings. You should not be ashamed of what is richly belittled in the struggle for the achievement of your goals: wealth and power "and rewarded brothers, and live happily." Vіn not to love Sophia, but to marvel at her as if for the sake of achieving your goals.
Sophia, as one of the representatives of the family household, having read sentimental novels, dreaming about a timid, quiet, lower kokhan, for whom he won and sees the zamіzh and raise a new "boy-lad", "person-servant". Molchalin itself, and not Chatsky, should walk under the world of a future person.
Later, Griboyedov, in his comedy, as if showing, how immoral and conservative types of representatives of the Moscow society are. For the new it is important to say so, that all stinks in a different way will understand life, yoga sense and ideals.
Even though we are beastly before the final comedy, it is more likely that the skin of the heroes appears as an unfortunate example. Chatsky, Famusov, Molchalin, Sophia - all of them are overwhelmed by their own grief. And the unfortunate stench through your wrong statements about life, wrongly understood life. Famusov started to try to live according to the laws of the world, trying not to call out the convict, the unpraised light. І scho vin otrimav prikintsі? Yogo was scammed by a powerful daughter! "Ah! My God! What will Princess Oleksiivna say?" - vigukuev vіn, respecting the unfortunate of us people.
Molchalin is not less unhappy. All your efforts have gone to waste: Sophia can’t help you anymore, and maybe, even worse, sting tatkov.
I in Sophia, her grief; її cheered up the kokhan lyudin. Vaughn was disappointed in her ideal of a good man.
But the most important of us is Chatsky, a sticky, free-spirited educator, a leading man of his hour, a victor of the rigidity, conservatism of Russian life. The most intelligent comedy wine cannot, with his mustache mind, work so that Sophia fell in love with yoga. Chatsky, who is less likely to have his own mind, those who are a sensible girl cannot overcome a sensible fool, so much rozcharovuetsya in the cinema. Aje everything, at scho vin viriv - at svey roz and advanced ideas, - not only did not help to win the heart of a kohano maiden, but on the other hand, it struck її in a new day.
In addition, through yoga volitional thoughts, the familiar suspenstvo sees yoga and deafens it as divine.
In this manner, Griboyedov argues that the reason for the tragedy of Chatsky is the misfortune of other heroes of the comedy - the inconsistency of their manifestations about the life of life itself. "The mind is out of tune with the heart" - the axis of the main conflict "Woe to the mind." And then we blame the food, as the statements about life are true and can be ignited. The image of Chatsky, in my opinion, gives a negative impression on nutrition. Chatsky is deeply sympathetic to Griboyedov. Vіn vygіdno vіdіznyаєtsі vіd famіїvskogo suspіlstva. Yogo's image has a typical image of abrist: Chatsky's finger, merry, volitional. Ale yogo look far into the real life and do not lead to happiness. Possibly, Griboyedov conveyed the tragedy of the Abrists, like his own idealist theory, breaking life.
In this way, "Mountain from Rose" has a few conflicts: love, suspense, the conflict of "the last century" and the "century of the past", but the main ones, in my opinion, are the conflict of idealistic manifestations about life and real life. Griboyedov was the first writer, who raised this problem, to the point that a lot of writers were worried about it in the 19th century. century: I. S. Turgenev, F. M. Dostoyevsky, L. N. Tolstoy.
The conflict “Woe in the Rose” by Griboyedov has two lines: love (special) and social (social). The love conflict was evoked on the classic love trick. Appointed literary creation classicism was provoking an ideal, which, having fallen into the hands of the vikonnі gromadyanskogo ob'yazku, pіdorderkuvannі іnteresіv іndividuals іѕ huge interests і svіdomlennі sensible laws zhittya. For these ideas, choose head hero like a bearer of a positive ideal, yoga antipode - negative hero and the ideal heroine, who gave her love to the positive hero and confirmed that he was right. Such a warehouse of a love tricutnik in a classicistic creation. Traditional roles were formed on the stage for the performance of these roles: the hero-kokhanets (the first kokhanets), the bad hero (fool, fat, shahrai) and the young lady (zakokhana pannochka).
Griboyedov rethinks the classic love trick: Chatsky is a positive hero, but a restless one, like the head character should be; Molchalin - a low and pdliy, a negative hero, but still love Sophia; Sophia is to fight the wrong choice, giving the victory to Molchalin Chatsky. Sophia's pardon creates a classicistic perspective for the development of the story and determines the development of the plot.
Tsikavo, that the name of Sophia in the translation of the Greek means “wise”, which, insanely, feels the author's sumptuous irony. The heroine talks about Chatsky and Molchalin, belittling one and magnifying the other. At 5 appearances 1 the servant of Sophia Liza, being afraid that Sophia and Molchalin's caregiver could be brought to a bidi, tries to turn her respect to other possible names - Colonel Skalozub and Chatsky.
The beginning of a love conflict is on the 7th ap- pearance on the 1st day, in which the first story of Chatsky and Sophia is described. The hero of the enemy's change is Sophia's appointment to the new one, you can't understand and understand the reason for it. Chatskyy throws Sophia on the back. Zustrivshi such a trick, Chatsky jokes svvchutya:
You Radi? at a good hour.
Prote schiro who is radіє so?
I give up, so finally
People and horses chill,
I'm only quiet to myself.
Vіn mаgaєєєєєєі вікікати at the girl's memory of the past, spodіvayuchis, scho just zabula for three years almost, yakі їх they po'yazuvali. However, Sophia cooled Chatsky's fuse again, saying: "Child!"
Only then Chatsky begins to understand the correct reason for changing the appointment to the new Sophia. Vіn put їy directly zakohannya, chi won't zakohana, і, otrimav sly evidence, guess about the truth. І after the words: “Forgive me, not for you, why are you wondering?” - to show the whole natural reaction to Sophia's behavior, Chatsky uncomfortably speaks about Moscow:
What new show me Moscow?
T wooing - caught up, and he missed.
All the same sense, and tі zh vіrshi in the albums.
Tsya zmіna those rozmovlena mentally swayed, oskolki Chatskyy, razumivshi nareshti, scho maє supernik, yogo shukati. The skin phrase of the hero’s forward expression confirms that in the skin phrase it’s a psychological clue: Moscow’s supernik, she won Yogo at the ball, everyone wants to be friendly, but they still stink.
It has long been noted that the suspense conflict is blamed on love, and Chatsky falls on Moscow, bewildered by his camp of the thrown kokhan. If the whole scene is the beginning of a love conflict, then Chatsky's words about Moscow are the birth of a suspenseful conflict, the beginning of which will be on the cob 2 dії. The very search of Chatsky's supernik to designate the character of the development of diy, and p'esa will end, if Chatsky's eyes are covered with a veil.
The social conflict in the comedy "Hot Out of Roses" by Griboyedov is pitted against the progressive nobleman-intellectual Chatsky with a conservative familial conscience. The conflict manifests itself in super-specific people, like representing the songs of the stake of the suspenst, the conflict is hourly. Griboyedov, a playwright, vikon those who want to make yoga a hero, saying:
Yak povnyat, she marvels
The centenary of the present and the passing of the centenary.
Viraz "the century of the present and the past" follows the understanding of two meanings: the whole period of the history of Russia, the divisions Vitchiznyanoy war 1812, as well as the conflict of the era, which was manifested in the struggle of new ideas and forms of life with the old ones. Most vividly the ideas of a new hour hung, behind the poetic formulas of Pushkin, in the "thoughts of the high pragnonni" of the Decembrists. I’m rich in what, look at Chatsky, they inspire the advanced ideas of the Decembrists.
Suspіlny conflict of comedy manifests itself in the supergirls of Chatsky and Famusov, who go through these heroes to this other superstitious problem. The peculiarity of the suspіlny conflict in p'єсі polgaє in the fact that guilt lies in the conflict of love, because the guilt is not represented by specific characters and podiah, and we can judge about it only by the monologues and replicas of the characters.
One of the most important meals for the nobility of that hour was the appointment to the power of that service. Itself vin to serve as a tie-in of a suspensory conflict in 2 manifestations 2 dії:
Chatsky
Serve radium, serve tediously.
Famusiv
Axis those, all proud!
Would you feed it, how did the fathers fight?
Famusov tells Chatsky the story of his uncle Maxim Petrovich, it is widely believed that it is a confession for Chatsky and may be able to judge - even in the behavior of Maxim Petrovich, on the yogo deep, reconciliation, rich wisdom. Whose formula is:
If you need to serve,
I vіn zginavsya vperegin.
Catering services are in three aspects. Nasampered tse moral nourishment, pіdrakhovuvati i "ginatisya vperegin" or save that honor. At that very hour, the service reveals the hromada position of the people: serve the Batkivshchyna, do it only for yourself, talk about the special benefit. I nareshti - a political bik of nutrition, a kind of clear expression in Chatsky's replies: "Who should serve right, and not persons."
The next most important food of comedy is the problem of creativity and creativity. Chatskyi speaks his position to the point of creaking in the monologue “Who is the judge?” in 5 appearances 2 dії:
And who is the judge? - For the old days of fate
Before a free life, the witch is unreconciled,
Judgments are drawn from stale newspapers.
Chatsky to talk about two types of non-human behavior of kriposniks. For the first of them, the kriposnik called on his faithful servants "Horti three dogs." Respectfully, Griboyedov's criticism may be more importantly moral than social in nature. Obviously, the pitiless and roaring krіpak of the moment is so blamed, for by the law they have the right, but Griboyedov is fighting here screaming inhumanity - people are pririvnyan to creatures. The playwright, naming the kriposnik "Nestor of the noblemen of the ignorant", gives an understanding that this person is not a vinyatkovy dashing, but rather richly "the noblemen of the wicked". Setting up to krіpakіv yak to nizhchih іstot was the norm for krіposnitskogo suspіlstva. So, old Khlostova speaks of Sophia about the girl of arapts and dogs, like about equals, but the same things (dia 3, yashche 10):
Tell them to slander, already, my friend,
In the evening, a handout came.
In addition, Chatsky’s monologue vikrivayut zhahlivy heritage of crime - human trafficking. One krіposnik to bring to Moscow the theater fortezi, signing for the ballet "in the form of mothers, fathers of torn children". Griboyedov shows how the right to dispose of life and the share of krіpakіv rozbeschuє nobles and stench waste their human traits. With the help of the right method of the clerk of the forte theater, the whole of Moscow was “marveled at the beauty” of the ballet and the little artists, in order to persuade the creditors to give a note on the payment of the borg. Prote your own wines are not available and selling children.
One of the most negative phenomena of the Russian activity of that hour was the fallow of foreign vdachas, modi, movi, rules of life. Before the dominance of the foreign in the life of the country, “slave, blind heritage”, Chatsky was placed with particular intransigence, the most stormy storm appeared at the monolose “At that kіmnaі zustrich is insignificant ...” (Diya 3, Yavishche 22). The plot episode, about which rozpovidaetsya in this monolosis, not performances on stage. Chatsky was struck by the vipadkova, “insignificant” zustrich: having drunk a wine, like this, the spivvitchizniks bypass the Frenchman less than the one who is a foreigner. Chatsky calls Yogo “Frenchman from Bordeaux” not out of disdain for the people, but out of defiance in a figurative contrast between the guest’s interchangeability and the servitude of the rulers. Chatsky is aware that the inheritance of foreign is a terrible scourge for the nation. The Frenchman knows that the wines of the French provinces, the floorings of the self-sacrificing all of them inherit French dachas, dressed up, speaking the sumish of “French with Nizhny Novgorod”. Chatsky sumu about the use by Russian nobles of national traditions, national garb, and a splendid look. Throwing the phrase with a hot vein: Ah! Let the people take over everything”, respecting that such behavior of the powerful Russian people, that її negative side - “empty slavish, blind inherited” - can be lived. About tse writing D.I. Fonvizin at the comedy "The Brigadier" (1769), whom I.S. Turgenev at the story "Asya" (1858), for which A.P. Chekhov at the comedy " cherry orchard”(1903), this problem was repeatedly violated in the literature of the XX century. In this rank, Griboyedov, having destroyed nutrition, is not relevant until the third hour, having tried to take the essence of the phenomenon.
The problem of foreign dominance in Russian life is related to the nourishment of patriotism. The position of Chatsky and її sympathy in the monolosis is extremely clear:
Shchob wise, badoriy our people
Want to move us without respecting them.
The problem of patriotism is presented in works widely and differently. The author shows that patriotism does not require the straying of the heritage of a foreign one, but, on the contrary, stubborn swagger, isolation from the knowledge of other cultures. In the same way, the position of Chatsky, for some kind of preservation of the goodness of one’s own nation, means an honor to other peoples. Calling a foreigner "a Frenchman from Bordeaux", Chatsky does not belittle the guest - he is scolded by the behavior of spivvitchizniks. Other characters are afraid and do not praise everything alien, like, for example, Khlestov is afraid of the girls of the black woman, or "Lancart's mutual navchans", otherwise it is smart to set up everything foreign. Famusov, the main opponent of Chatsky, in some ways of arrogance, calling foreigners “tramps”, in others, on the other hand, it is clear that the Prussian king marveled at Moscow girls, stinks of stink are not given up to French women and Germans (dia 2, yore 5):
You can’t say a word in simplicity, everything is done with urgency;
French romances sleep to you
І top show notes.
Tse means that the worthiness of one's own nation for Famusov is a value of change, shards to lie down depending on what looks like ruins for a new foreigner in a specific skin type.
The way of life of the Moscow nobility is another problem, which Griboyedov brings to the comedy. Let's show for qієї those є Famusov's monologue in 1 yavschi 2 dії. At this stage, it is miraculous that Famusov, cherishing the state minister, plans his day in such a way that there is no way out of special rights and roses. The new one has three “important” celebrations for the day: for the second - trout, for the fourth - pohovannya, “for Friday, or maybe for Saturday” - chrestini. For Famusov’s student, the layout of the “business” type is marked, and the philosophy and the zmist of his life are shown: it is formed from the fact that you die, die, be born, die again and die ... It’s monotonous about the life of Famusov and famusivtsiv.
Rozmirkovuyuchi way of life of the nobility, Griboyedov stosuetsya problems of roses. At the ball, Chatsky seemed to Molchalin (dia 3, yishche 3):
If on the right - I am kind of cheerful,
When foolish - foolish,
And zmishuvati two crafts
Є dark maistriv, I'm not on the th day.
Chatsky is not against rozvag, but against the fact that they should be beaten with the right, pracey. Prote vіdpovіdalnіst і prаtsyu znikayut іz zhiztya bolshostі gentry, podavyuchis postіyno satisfaction і rozvagi. Such is life empty and empty. Guess what, as Chatsky said about Moscow (dia 1, yavishche 7):
Yesterday there was a ball, and tomorrow there will be two.
But the words of Countess Babush Khryumina, which sounded comical, but tragic for the human sensu (dia 4, yavishche 1):
Let's sing, mother, I'm not right to force,
If I fell into that grave.
Right not in what bali chi іnshi secular rozvagi filthy powerful forces - I will become part of the culture of the noble at that hour. But if the ball occupies all life, it becomes a light, then for a person, the glare transforms into a dark grave, there was no mute life itself. Less work and repairs are natural, which change one form of human life, stinks add to and improve one another, we will comprehend and enrich life.
The theme of the mind occupies a special place in comedy - enlighten, enlighten that vihovannia. On purpose, I will name the creation and on purpose, I have given respect to the author himself, if he wrote: “My comedy has twenty-five fools for one sensible person.” The first little comedy Griboyedov called "Woe to the mind." Change the name of the change in the accent of the philosophical idea, as you can name it in such a way that the skin mind is grief, on the social: the mind of the soul is the cause of grief. The theme of the mind in p'єсі podіlyaє charac- ters how well their setting up to life. For famous people, the value of becoming less practical is the benefit, so it is wise for them to dominate life. Chatsky has a rozneniya, everything is important for him: special hot meals. Yogo statements about life are wide, the stench goes beyond the boundaries of special interests. It can be said that Chatsky's judgment is based on reason and moral precepts before life. The fate of famous people is surrounded by their narrow manifestations, mindfulness of special interests and benefits. So, for Sophia, the sensible one who rebukes the order from her (dia 1, yashche 5):
Oh! how to love someone,
Navischo rozum shukati and їzditi so far?
For Molchalin, a reasonable behavior is to be smart, be it for someone, for whom you want to lie down (dia 3, monstrosity 3):
My life is not guilty buti
Your mother's judgment.
For Skalozub, the order of the world is a military way, and the “reasonable” camp is to change at the ranks, a reasonable behavior is to hang out at the first line. Skalozub navit in his own way "philosopher". V_n judge like a philosopher (dia 2, yashche 4):
I could only get away with the general.
Also, the skin character talks about the mind, about the light. It turns out that the ideas of Enlightenment have penetrated the Muscovite society. However, the sprynyattya of these ideas are shown to be pardoned: the familiars are more likely to be laced up to the enlightenment of that reading, which was announced about the correct creation. Famusivtsi to dance, that the threat is like the mind of Chatsky, yogo illumination and luminosity, so they go to the only wild way to fight it - neutralize the yogo rose, so that everything, that wine seems to be of no small importance, because it seems like madness. In this struggle, the interests of the souls and specialties arise, so Sophia herself does not expressly let a little bit about Chatsky’s divine. The plot lines that create love and suspense conflicts develop at the same time, but compositionally in a different way. The exposition is a double bed for both lines and ends before the 7th appearance of the 1st day. The beginning of a love conflict was in 7 cases of 1 subdivision, a social one - in 2 occurrences of 2 subdivisions. The culmination of the suspensory conflict after the end of the 3rd day, if the suspense turns into Chatsky, and the super river between them is no longer possible. The culmination of the love conflict is seen in 12 appearances of the 4th day: Chatsky sees through, Sophia is close to insomnia, Molchalin "goes to his room." Rozvyazka oboh storylines escaping at the moment when Chatsky leaves Famusov’s house with the words (dia 5, yashche 14):
He is from Moscow! I don't come here anymore.
Tim is not smaller, the finale of the comedy is overwhelmed with criticism: it’s nowhere far away - no where straight Chatsky, no fault of work, no way wedged in his arrival at the family’s conscience. Prote faithfully respecting Goncharov, scho "Chatsky zlamany kіlkіstu old force, zavdav їy, his black, mortal blow like a kіlkіst force fresh." Who has the realism of comedy.
Dzherelo (short): Moskvin G.V. Literature: Grade 8: about 2 years. Part 2 / G.V. Moskvin, N.M. Puryaeva, E.L. Erokhin. - M: Ventana-Graf, 2016
Remember Paskevich,
Riveting the disgraced Yermolov...
What lost youmu?
Ambition, cold and anger...
Vіd bureaucratic old,
Vіd uїdlivih secular pricks
Vin at the kibittsі kitten,
Squat down on the cane.
D. Kedrin
Oleksandr Sergiyovich Griboyedov, having achieved great literary fame and nationwide popularity, having written the comedy “Likho z razumu”. This TV has become innovative in Russian literature of the first quarter of the 19th century.
For classical comedy, it was more characteristic to split the characters into positive and negative ones. The victory was always for the positive heroes, even as the negative ones were viewed and recognized as hits. In Griboyedov's comedy, the characters are divided differently. The main conflict is between the appearances of the underdog of the heroes on the representatives of the “ninish century” and the “past century”, moreover, Oleksandr Andriyovich Chatskyy is actually the only one to lie down to the first, before that the wines are often seen in the comedy camp, although they are positive heroes. At the same time, the main yogo "opponent" Famusov is not even a stale bastard, but, on the contrary, a tse dbaylivy dad and a good-natured person.
Those are the ones who Chatsky's childhood passed at Pavel Afanasiyovich Famusov's house. Moscow panske life was calm and calm. Today buv is similar to another. Bali, offend, evening, chrestini...
That wooing - caught up, and that missed.
All the same sense, and tі zh vіrshi in the albums.
Zhіnok, more importantly, borrowed money. Stink love everything foreign, French. The women of the family household have one meta - to become a foreigner, or to see daughters for a rich man. With this, behind the words of Famusov himself, the women "judge everything, crossly, there are no judgments over them." For intercession, we must go to the yakoїs Tetyani Yuriyivna, more “officials and townspeople all їy friends and all relatives”. Princess Mariya Oleksiivna has such a vag in the great supremacy that Famusov seems to fear in fear:
Oh! My God! What does Princess Maria Oleksiivna say to the time!
And what about people? All stinks are occupied by them, so that the yakomoga will stick out more social gatherings. Axis, the thoughtless martinet Skalozub, who lives all the worlds in military worlds, is hot in a military way, being a sign of stupidity and obmezhennosti. Ale tse yakraz i means a good growth prospect. The new one has one meta - "distant generals". Axis little official Molchalin. Vіn not without satisfaction to talk about those who "having taken away three decorations, are listed in the Archives", and you, obviously, want to "go to the steps of vіdomih".
The Moscow "ace" Famusov himself told young people about the nobles Maxim Petrovich, who served for Katerina and, dominating the place at court, not showing any business qualities or talents, but having become famous for it, who often "bent" in bows . Then "mav a hundred people to serve", "all in orders." Axis i є іdeal famusovskogo suspіlstva.
Moscow nobles pihat and proud. Before people who are bіdnіshih for themselves, they stink with contempt. Ale is especially felt in replicas, savage to krіpakіv. Stinks - "parsley", "fomki", "chumps", "ice grouse". Among them, one rozmov: “The robot has you! Settle you!”. We close the ranks of famous people to stand up against everything new, advanced. The stench can be poliberal, but the root changes are afraid like fire. Skills of hatred in Famusov's words:
Navchannya - the axis of the plague, vchenist - the axis of the cause,
What is more dense, lower if,
Divinely separated people, and right, and thoughts.
In this rank, Chatsky is well aware of the spirit of the "centenary of the past", signified by servility, hatred to the point of enlightenment, an empty life. Everything early destroyed our hero's nudga and ogida. Ignoring the friendship with dear Sophia, Chatskyy leaves the houses of his relatives and starts an independent life.
"Polyuvannya mandruvati attacked the new one ..." Yogo's soul longed for the novelty of modern ideas, collaborating with advanced people for an hour. We leave Moscow and go to St. Petersburg. "High thoughts" for a new mustache. She herself gathered in Petersburg to look at that pragnennya of Chatsky. Vin, maybe, got stuck with literature. Navit to Famusova felt a bit, that Chatsky "write nicely, translate." Vodnocha Chatskogo zahoplyuє suspіlna diyalnіst. Vіn vinikaє “with the ministers of calls”. Prote not for long. The high understanding of honor did not allow him to serve, if he wanted to serve right, but not to persons.
After whom, Chatsky, perhaps, having visited the village, de, following the words of Famusov, “enjoyed”, pomilkovo managing the maetkom. Potіm our hero virushaє for the cordon. On the “high road” they marveled askance, as if they were displaying a liberal spirit. And yet, the acquaintance of the representatives of the Russian noble youth with life, philosophy, history Western Europe a little great value for their development.
І axis we zustrіchaєmosya already zі zrіlim Chatsky, people zі sformirovannymi idey. The slavish morality of the familial suspense Chatsky opposes to the high court of honor and obsession. Vіn biasedly vikrivaє hateful youmu krіposnitskiy ustriy. You can’t talk calmly about “Nestor of the Negligent Nobles”, who change the servants into dogs, or about those who “signed to a strong ballet ... like mothers, fathers of torn children” and went broke, selling them all one by one.
Axis tі, yakі lived to see sivini!
Axis to shake whom we can in the desert!
The axis of our suvori potsіnovuvachі and judiciary!
Chatsky hates “the past life for the future”, people, like “judgment scoop from the forgotten newspapers of Ochakov’s hours and the roots of Krim”. A sharp protest is called out in the new nobility's bow to the usm іnozemniy, the French vihovannia, simple in the middle of the gentry. In his famous monologue about the “Frenchman from Bordeaux” he can talk about the hot predilection of the common people to their fatherland, the national voices of that movie.
As a right educator, Chatskyi is precariously right to the mind and deeply believe in his power. In roses, in vihovanni, in the hromada duma, in the strength of the ideological and moral infusion of wines, the head and the mighty profit of the transformation of society, the change of life. Vin protects the right to serve the enlightenment and science:
Now let one of us
Three young people, there is an enemy of shukan, -
Not vimagayuchi no mist, no promotion to the rank,
The science of wine has a fixed mind, a kind of pragmatic knowledge;
But in the soul of Yogo God himself awakens the heat
To creative, high and beautiful mysticisms, -
Stink once: rozbіy! Pozhezha!
And become famous among them as a merman! Not safe!
To such young people, among the Crimea, Chatsky, one can name, perhaps, also the cousin of Skalozub, the nephew of Princess Tugoukhivska - “chemist and botany”. Ale about them at p'єsі yedetsya pobezhno. Among the guests of Famusov, our hero is the same.
- Obviously, Chatsky is making money for his enemies. Well, if you want to strum Yogo Skalozub, you will feel to yourself: "Wheezy, strangled, bassoon, narrow down the maneuvers of that mazurka!" Chi Natalya Dmitrivna, what kind of wine has pleased life in the countryside? Chi Khlestova, why should Chatsky laugh out loud? Ale is the most distant, obviously, to Molchalin. Chatsky vvazhaє yoga "zhalyugidnym" similar to all bad ones. Sophia s avenge for such words I deafen Chatsky with divine. All for the joy of pidhoplyuyut tsyu novelty, the stench is widely believed at the tile, more, really, at that suspіlstvі vіn it's crazy.
A. Z. Pushkin, having read “Likho z razumu”, having respected that Chatsky throws pearls in front of pigs, that they do not break wines in any way, whom they are killed with their angry, biased monologues. І z cim can not help but wait. Ale Chatsky is young. That wine and not mav could start a super-girl for the older generations. We want to pamper Sophia, to the point of childishness maw heart pretentiousness. Insha river, what in an hour, which passed from the last of the last days, Sophia changed. Chatsky zbentezheny її cold reception, wines are made to be sensible, as it could be, that wines are no longer needed. Possibly, the mental trauma itself triggered the conflict mechanism.
As a result, Chatsky’s new development with this world is seen, for some wines he has his own childhood and for some blood ties. Ale, the conflict, which calls for a new development, is not special, not vipadkovy. The conflict is social. It was not just different people who stumbled, but different light-gazers, different supple positions. The arrival of Chatsky to Famusov’s house became a startling conflict, the development of wines was taken from the super girls and the monologues of the main characters (“And judge who?”, “Axis, all of you are proud!”). Increasingly unreasonable that perception leads to a climax: at Chatsky's ball, one is recognized as crazy. And here I am in my own mind, that all the words of that soulful ruhi were familiar:
All in unison glorified me with God's blessings.
You make a walkie-talkie: from the fire of that viida of incompetence,
Who is with you try the day,
Go and try one,
I in the new mind of comfort.
Razvyazka conflict - the departure of Chatsky from Moscow. Vіdnosini fa-musіvskogo suspіlstva that protagonist z'yasovanі to kintsya: stench deeply znevevayut alone and do not want the mother of anything sleepy. It is impossible to say who wins. Aje conflict between old and new is eternal, like light. And the theme of the sensible, enlightened people in Russia is evil and today. I until this day in the mind suffer more, lower in the day of daylight. With this sensi A.S. Griboyedov, having created a comedy at all hours.
The conflict of the comedy "Likho z rozumu"
Conflict in Latin literally means zіtknennya, kolіzіyu, struggle. Different writers, representatives of different writers directly conflict with the creation differently, for example, among the classicists - the conflict is almost obscure, among the romantics - the conflict of specialness and suppleness.
Until now, a lot of scholars and connoisseurs of Russian literature have been talking about the conflict in the "Likho z rozumu", while Griboyedov's co-workers took yoga in an absolutely different way. Yakschko Take Until Uvagi Announced Written, then you can save, Shaho Molboyov, it's possible to Klasicizm, Vikrovuvach, Vikoditov, Tombto Software, Vikoditu, Tobto Z_TKNENNY Rosuma, Suspilty Single, Obliki, Northern Rivne LyudskiSikistіv , obviously).
Ale, madly, Nabagato glibshe and maє bagatosharova, so be moving, "cibulinna" Budova. In order to comprehend yoga depth and philosophical sense, it is necessary to look through all the equals of the rich-ball conflict.
Otzhe, The conflict of the comedy "Likho z rozumu" Glibkiy, which allowed Goncharov to say at the statue “Million of torments”: “It is famously from the mind” appeared earlier than Onegin, Pechorin, survived them, passed through the Gogol period, lived through the century ... waste your life." Chatsky - eternal type. Vin is trying to bring into harmony a little bit that mind. Vіn himself seems that “the mind is not in harmony with the heart”, but not the mind of all the seriousness of the threat. Chatsky is the hero, who was inspired by one impulse, everyone who robs, robs on the same breath, hardly allowing pauses between the litigation at the kohanna and slandering pansky Moscow with monologues. Chatsky is not an educator in the style of Voltaire and Rousseau, his "new". the democratic ideas of wines develop with such a fuse and a fuse that a reasoner could not afford. From the point of view of a classicist, for example Katenin, such behavior is unacceptable. Chatsky for the new one transforms into a caricature, and the whole comedy - into a farce. To come out, that Chatsky’s ardor to enter into a conflict with the advice of Famusov, which kind of good vimage, so that everything was broken up “by the senses, sensibly, by the arrangement.” Ale yakby it so happened, the comedy turned into a farce conflict - into a confrontation with bad heat and worldly wisdom, then into a purely psychological one.
Griboyedov wrote (at the leaf to Katenina): “I hate caricatures, I don’t know the same in my picture.” Yogo Chatsky - not like a caricature, The author depicts yoga is alive, in Russia, we have a protirich, the new one has a character. The conflict of the comedy "Likho z rozumu" f, scho blames between him and Famusov, may have a social-psychic character. The Decembrist rebellion has changed. Yogo friends of the Decembrists, Griboyedov's co-workers, took the comedy like a shout, The conflict of the comedy "Likho z rozumu"- as an opir of progressive youth in the person of Chatsky, a representative of the “nine century”, old conservative ideas of the “past century”. At Chatsky's, the Decembrists used to chastkovy themselves, and stench, maybe, malice. These best people of their time, dark, with lofty goals and aspirations, wanted to change the camp of Russia one day, on one impulse, a sense of honor, a binding of justice. The analogy of Chatsky with the Decembrists was carried out by Griboyedov’s contemporary scholars, and by many of the less recent successors, for example, Academician Nechkin at the book “Griboyediv and the Decembrists”. Ale, choking on Chatsky's shrill monologues, the henchmen didn't finish the rhyming sentence. Vaughn yakraz zovsim do not call to be-any kind, Chatsky їde from Moscow rozcharovanim, and the picture of the finale did not carry in itself joy, nі optimism. They did not remember the stench of those who were not able to fight between Chatsky and family suspense. At the same time, remarks are indicated - so, like the remaining remark of the third dії: “Look around, everyone is circling around the waltz with the greatest diligence. Years of people wandered off to the card tables. The direct replies of the heroes show that the super-girls are absolutely perfect, with Chatsky there is no way to conflict, you don’t have to ask for help:
Famusiv:
I don't listen, pid court!
I asked for help,
Chi is not a great service.
Chatsky, with his advanced ideas, begins to look simply stupid, “winning guests at the evening at Famusov’s, not vrakhovuchi, that people here just got up to dance, get excited,” says Ya. Behind the great rahunka Comedy conflict « Woe to the mind»for a bigger deal, not a conflict, a super girl cannot be a super girl, as only one side is represented, as if there is only one person. “The drama of Chatsky is a storm in the sky,” to speak about the conflict between Chatsky and the soothing V. Belinsky.
Many people have written and spoken about the conflict between “the past century” and “the next century”. “A hundred years have passed” ringing in the fact that the wines are strangling everything new, more progressive, not allowing it to develop. The subjects of the Decembrists, “the age of the ninth”, are not better for themselves, more, like the stench was respected, the newer is invariably better, progressive, lower those that were bulo. "A century is croaking to a glorious blow!" - writing at the same time Küchelbecker, that, in seeming words of the popular ninth dog, Chatsky, and the skin of the result will take "a million torments." All the stench is reasonable, the scarlet mind enters into conflict with living lives. Sophia, for example, having read French novels, she also has the same primary knowledge about life, like Chatsky. In life, everything is not so, as beautifully described in French novels, in conflicts from life, the rationality of heroes enters. Until the end of the day, everyone is rebuying with the zamіshan. Chatsky seems to:
I do not inform the wine,
I hear, I don't understand...
But Famusov, unassuming in his stubbornness, with a rapt mustache that went smoothly before, turns over on his head.
Is my share not deplorable yet?
Oh! My God! What do you say
Princess Maria Oleksiivna!
Like Gogol’s example of The Inspector, the vaga tezh hіba sho catches in that nіmomu nіmomu nіmomu nіmomu nіmomu nіmіmі, іdpovіd іt swear іn “impossibility іѕ а sort of historical sub'єktіvіzm, primіtі dіynostі over “mrіy” i romantic “phantasy” Lebedev.
