Nayv_domishy childish tvir of Tendryakov. Literary life with the work of V.F.Tendryakov
Explanatory note
To your respect, the literature lesson “The theme of morality in the works of V.F. Tendryakov's "Rozplata" and "Nothing after graduation".
Tsey lesson conducting on the 2nd year of the technical school of secondary vocational education. (grade 11).
Teachers can write a new script for the lesson, one part, the other elements, and the lesson plan.
Lessons from modern literature actively embrace the formation of the growing culture of reading, to form independently analyze and evaluate the different sides of life, to work morally, to accept reasonable ideas and thoughts.
Before the lesson, the lads took off the task:
Prepare a presentation of the biography and creativity of the writer;
-write a review about the readings of tvir.
Teacher at the lesson:
-Support new material,
Direct thoughts of students
- sponkaє to diyalnostі.
Learn at the lesson:
-Support information in the presentation about the work of the writer;
- provide nutrition;
Receive and evaluate information from the presentation
Give us a dream;
Discuss the thoughts of others;
robbing the whiskers
- Create a baseline
Practicing creativity: guessing verses, cinquain, writing reviews about the read work, picking up and formulating favors for friends;
Grant on vibir a favor
Forms of organization of primary activity : group, frontal, individual
methodi Key words: naochno-іlustrative, reproductive, chastkovo-poshukovy.
Prepared by: E.M. Sitchikhina, illustrator of Russian movies and literature.
Plan - lesson summary on the topic: The theme of morality in contemporary literature. V.Tendryakov "Rozplata" and "Nothing after graduation"
Lesson topic: The theme of morality in contemporary literature. V.Tendryakov
“Payment” and “Nothing after release”
lesson type: combinations
Objectives of the lesson :
Lighting numbers:
1. Understand the creative mind.
2. Continue shaping the habit of thoughtful reading.
3. Continue developing in the meantime to analyze the artistic text,
see problems, argue your opinion.
Developing goals:
1. Develop a movement, a thought, a mind to discuss with a primer
your thoughts.
2. Make it easy to analyze, bring, formulate
visnovki.
Vihovni tsili:
1. To educate a little respect for your vchinki that vminnya їх
evaluate honestly and objectively.
2. Push the lads more respectfully to look at yourself, why don’t you
entrusted to the people, as required їх rozumіnnya, їх participation, їх
sleepy.
Lesson task:
1. Actualization of those morality in the creativity of the writer.
Problems for the choice of life, who is guilty of tragedies,
life situations - the main topics in the writings of the writer
Material before the lesson :
Portrait of V.F.Tendryakov, exhibition of his creations and books about him,
presentation of the writer's work; work sheets for work in
groups, colored hearts for pobazhan.
Etapi lesson:
1.org moment.
2. Actualization of knowledge (moral and social feedback to the lesson-decorated on arches and on slide1)
3. First mastering new material
Acquaintance with the biography and work of V.Tendryakov (revision of the presentation)
(Working in groups on working arches, discussing what was read to the creator, filling in opinions, drawings on arches)
At the lesson, there is a group meeting: someone reading "Rozplata" -1 group", someone reading "Nich after graduation" -2 group
5. Primarily fixed
Recording at zoshit vysnovkіv for creations (for groups)
6. Consolidation of knowledge
Formulation of propositions-pobazhan from "wise thoughts"
7. Reflection.
Head of the lesson: 1. Org. moment
2. Actualization of knowledge: (slide 2)
Moral call to the lessonGive advice for 1 meal
Social wiki to the lesson
Read "wise thoughts ... for all"
How did a thought tempt you to make up your mind?
Why are the sim's ruining?
How do children try to solve the problems of grown-ups?
Chi zavzhd є instruct the one who stretched out his hand to help?
How can girls be able to be grown up?
How do you put yourself in the position to be respected by grown-up people?
How can you bring your maturity?
How do you change your mind about your behavior, as well as other people who hate you?
Did you remember that rice, stepping over the yak, did you think you were grown up?
Wise thoughts:
A) Until then, the people did not learn such a science, as if it would help to understand the retinue - a person, a susid - a susida, a team - a specialty, nareshti, a country - a foreign country, a nation - a nation. "Alien soul - darkness." Tsyu gіrku istina from the depths of the century brought an hour. And yet, literature hangs on the darkness of the human soul, reveals the secret of me - yours - to you - mine. V.Tendryakov.
B) It’s easier to become a dad, it’s easier to get rid of him. V. Klyuchevsky.
C) Without good fathers, there is no good education, not respecting all schools, institutes and boarding schools. N. Karamzin.
D) One father means more, less than a hundred teachers. J. Herbert.
E) The guilt of that merit of the children of the majestic world lies on the heads of that conscience of their fathers. F. Dzerzhinsky.
E) "... A person is perverted by him, as he was born, as he became friends, as he died ..." V. Shukshin
The word of the teacher : You are 16-18 years old. Vіk, if there is a childless childishness, and mrії and mrії are changed by the realities of life. V_k the first kohanny. Vik, if you often think about the sense, about recognition, about your place in life, about morality. It is immoral for adzhe to bring one's soul to the point of confusion, to the ruin of specialness.
Light, with whom a man is alive, rіznomanіtny and minlivy. Light of good and evil, light of zhorstokostі and mercy. And in this majestic world, a person is a small bean. A little squeak, but a great mystery. And literature helps us to penetrate into the mystery,The same problems of obov'yazku, morality, cosice always praised and praised Russian writers in different hours. These problems are the main ones in the work of the Russian writer, our co-worker V.F. Tendryakov.
Let this lesson become a drive for deep thoughts about life, about our life, about your place in the new, about future.
What do we know about V.F.Tendryakov?
3. First mastering the material (knowledge of the biography and creativity of the writer)
Presentation revision (slide 3-16)
Do you know how to create a writer?
Replying to….
(skin learns by reading 1 tvir per vibir: “Payment” or “Nothing after graduation”
4. Acknowledgment and understanding of the initial information
(Working in groups on working arches, discussing what was read to the creator, listening to thoughts, filling in opinions, drawing on arches)
At the lesson, there is an association of groups: whoever read "Rozplata" -1 group,
who read "Nich after graduation" - 2nd group
Worksheet
1. Who is to blame for the family tragedy of the Koryakins?_______________________________
2. Yakim buv dad?
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
3. Chi could mother save this tragedy?
__________________________________
__________________________________
1. What caused the conflict between graduates at nothing after the graduation ____________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
2. Will you wait for your lads to say one to one everything “without regret and rubbish”?
_______________________________
3. Until what kind of insight do the boys come, if they find out that Yashka sokir is going to beat Genk?
_______________________________
_______________________________
4. What are the problems to put a writer in this book?
__________________________________
4. What problem is the writer destroying in this part of the book, telling about the conflict of friends? (Tolerance by extension one to one).
______________________________
5. What lessons did you build from what you read?
_________________________________
5. What lessons can be learned from this book?
_______________________________
Why is the story called "Rozplata"? To whom? For what?
- Morally vihovannya people, whose right?
- Can you save this tragedy?
There is no misfortune on earth, a spontaneous crime, as it would not be possible to bring a great and small people to the chis.
І repayment, for Tendryakov, for the tragedy of the little father’s wife, we check for everyone who didn’t kill the susilla, wanting to be blamed for the moment.
Visnovok: Forever, we put before you our tasks. Virishuvati їх from the position of honor to people means moral growth, mature.
5. First fixed.
You discussed the reading, create, smashed the visnovki.
Chi will you wait with the whiskers on the slides? (problems)
(Slide 17-18)
Write down at zoshit (for groups)
6. Consolidation of knowledge
Formulate for 1 proposition-help from "wise thoughts" (let's turn to the stage of the lesson - actualization of knowledge)
Read your propositions (read out)
Learn to understand something else
Be a good dad all life
Father can take good children
be only honest and not in a different way;
harm no one;
do not fight the strong, help the weak;
it is not possible to change our world to something else, but try to correct yoga.
do not dare to put up with the filthy, be kind without an ordinary deed;
do not solve the problems of fathers
respect the thought of grown-ups
Give one teacher from a group your prayer (at the lesson)
(Come one to one and bestow blessings)
7. Reflection:
Write 10 words of morality in the first lesson
Shiro spіvchuttya
Vvіchlivіst pity
Povaga to razuminnya
Justice of speech
Love tolerance and others
-Sinkwine
Asking a writer
What was the main thing for you in life, if you became a writer?
Chi were people in your life who brought suffering to loved ones?
Fragment from the novel by V.F.Tendryakov "Nothing after graduation"Vira: - We'll be leaving soon. They knew one of the same to the day, similar - and raptom ...
Igor: - A chi until the day we knew one of one? - Having doubts.
Vira: - What are you? Ten years at once - and not until the day.
Igor: - Do you know what I think about you?
Vira: - Not bad? About me? What are you?
Igor: - Didn't you think badly about me? Ten years at once.
Vira: - It didn't trap. I don't care about anyone...
Igor: - I'll take your holiness, Madonna. Genka, you are my friend, - I will be good for you?
Genk:- Don't wait.
Igor: - Otozh i out. In hvilin's life, important things are not trapleyaetsya.
Genk: - The sicklings are heavy ... And did we have stench?
Igor: - Correctly! There were no important wheezes, but there were all sorts of thoughts.
Yulechka: - Boys! Girl!.. I really, really want to know... I wondered what you all me... So, they didn’t like the class... Speak frankly, please. I don’t need to be dishonest and don’t mess around.
Genk: - And what, my friends? Let's part ways, so that nothing is nailed.
Igor: - Do not see, - Igor declared.
Genk: - Don’t see, why didn’t they make friends to the door?
Igor: - A yakscho vіdvertіst not worthy?
Genk: - Well, that's the price of our friendship.
Natka : - I may not want to say what I think. For example, about you.
Genk: - Well, bondage is not possible.
Yulechka: - Whoever doesn't want to talk, that can get up and drink!
Genk: - About quiet, hto pishov, we will not speak. Only in disguise! - ahead of Genk.
Socrates : - And I’m especially mindful, drip on me, squeeze it, don’t try it on the tooth (check five times on the strings) Pi-re-zhi-woo!
Yulechka: - I'm not up to the light bulb!
Igor: - Meni, maybe, so.
Vira:- I meni...
Genk: - But I'll survive and work, if you say something bad about me, - Genka said.
Igor: - Forgive everyone.
Natka:- I'm overflowing.
Genk: - You say everything until the day and open it in text.
Natka: - Do not tell me, Genochko, how to live.
Igor: - For whom do we care? Whom to judge?
Yulechka:- To me!
Igor: - Let's go with Viri. You, Virko, payko, it’s easier for you to take a rozgin.
Vira: - Oh, I'm afraid of pepper!
Genk: - You can change me, - Genka said.
Genka anіtrohi did not hesitate at his own - at school everyone loved yoga, before friends he was holy and pure, let Natka feel what to think about.
Yakby wins siv together with us, having changed at the sleeping compartment - it’s possible, everything would have gone better otherwise. Vіn himself setting himself against everyone - sue them, you must be true. And to that skin the word sounded more significant, more serious, and also, more different. Ale tse vіdkrilosya pіznіshe, at the same time Genka standing with a smile, check. Nova gra did not give up to you rizikovanoy.
Everyone looked at Igor, knowing to speak frankly, rudely, but in such a way that they didn’t look like Genka’s closest friend, to whom, as if not you, the first word.
Igor: - I pass. I'll listen first.
Vira:- I will tell
Genochko, do you know how lucky you are?
Genk: - Garazd, do not smear molasses.
Vira: - Oh, Genochko, wake up ... Most of the fact that you were born happily, you have the director of the plant, you can say, gentleman of the city. If you demanded what, Genochko? Did your mother bark at you for the torn coat, for the worn out slippers? You need a new suit - be kind, the old bicycle is not suitable - buy another one. Lucky for the people.
Genk: - So what, why can I repent?
Vira: - І garni ti, і health, і sensible, і character is kind, because you won’t call anyone. Ale... I don't know what everyone is talking about? Already raptom image.
Genk: - Speak. I will endure.
Vira: - So from you, Gena, callous, like us happy people.
Genk:- Oh come on?
Genk: - Drive apply!
Vira: - For example, I twisted my leg, lay at home - did you see me? Ni.
Genk: - Vira, you are the only one with us ... noble. Not everyone is like you.
Vira: - Garazd, it's not tight on me. Ale ti on Igor Proukhov, let's say, is not similar. Remember, Socrates' mother drove out the nadvir?
Socrates : - Let's make it clear, old lady. Chi did not drive away, but pishov himself, maintaining his own principles.
Vira: - With whom did you spend the night, Socrates?
Socrates : - Igor. Created for me your masterpiece - a portrait of a hippie.
Vira: - And why not in Genya? The new one has his own room, a large sofa.
Socrates : - For me there, ale zovsіm comfortable.
Vira: - Otozh, Socrates, not comfortable. It is important to show you Genkin as a guest. You - unkempt, unmited.
Socrates : - N-ale! Please, no fluff!
Vira: - You are unhappy, but there are happy houses.
Genk: - What do you want me to do? Why am I here wine?
Vira: - So, Genochko, so! You are not guilty, you are callous. But how evil is stealing an unfortunate life, is it true? BUT?
Socrates : - Well, old amusing girl, you can do it today!
Genk: - Callous to the one who didn’t see the pіvroku to you, didn’t cry over your twisted leg! But to the one that Socrates is not up to me, but to spend the night before Igor sticking his head out! Well, you know...
Vira: - Guess, Genochko, if Slavko Panyukhin spent pennies for the campaign ...
Genk: - Don't you remember who lied to Slavka? Can you?!
Vira: - Ah-ha-ah! I knew what bike sales you were telling us! But don't you just leave, Genochko. Tobі old bike is already worn, new one is needed - racing ...
Genk: - Ty!.. Get out! Tse swine!
Vira: - Doesn't fit? Vibach. I myself want it, go to the bottom, go all the way...
Genk: - Bullshit! To the rest of the word, nonsense! Especially about the bike!
Igor: - Skinchimo tsiu tyaganina, lads. Let's digest.
Genk: - Ni! We don't... Don't hide!
Igor: - Todі vmovimosya - do not lie in the dance. Let your skin seem to think - yogo right, be patient.
Vira: - I won't say another word!
Genka is still alive, it’s possible - no one has stepped in, not knowing the blow, he has not been able to protect himself, having protected others. The first axis in front of Vira Zherikh, as if she could not stand up for herself, forever nailed to someone, vins, Genk, bezporadny. And everything to marvel at the new cіkavіstu, ale without speech. Mov razdyagneniya - nіyakovo, hotch failed!
Yulechka:- Can you have me?
Not having seen the sickness, not asking the homeless Socrates to spend the night, an old bicycle ... Like all the drib'yazkova nіsenіtnitsa!
I believe, I believe - you, Gena, you don’t move at a friend’s place and a bicycle for the sake of a comrade, you don’t hurt ... I’ll leave my shirt on. I believe! Ale... Ale for what? Just for the sake of one thing, Gena: you don’t waste your life, so that you become beautiful. So! And the axis of the leper, on the butt, you would not have become a likuvat, like Albert Schweitzer, but not crossed the road - buried. I just don’t support an unfortunate thing, because I don’t applaud anyone with it. In the face of callousness? .. Ni! It's more serious here. Not callousness here, but worse - selfishness! You look at the stale skin, but you don’t have selfishness, You’re a firefly, Gena, you burn brightly, but you don’t grit.
Genka zatskovano povіv pіdborіddyam. Friends were sitting in front of him. He didn't have any of his closest friends. I stink, close ones, I know the children, it seems to be, it’s not good to think about the new one, it’s not good to start with the enemy.
Genk: - You earlier ... why am I a firefly? How many times did you sleep at once?
Yulechka:- I figured it out a long time ago.
Genk: - Igor, come on.
Igor: - Maybe, we still do. Let's part as enemies.
Genk: - Ryatuesh, benefactor?
Igor: - I don't want to get into you, old man.
Genk: - Rizh, don't be shy.
Igor:- N-yes.
Igor Proukhov... Behind him, Genka sat on the same desk, stealing yoga from the children's beaters. How often the stench lay on the fishing grounds of the night pits, they said to one naypotamnishe. Bagato quarreled, often did not wait, used to, got angry, barked at him, but at no point did she reach the witch on the right. Igor is not Yulechka Studenteva. From yakbi Igor ozumiv, how important it is to you, Gentsi, at once: looking like a fool, slandering without guilt, slandering - a firefly, you need to ... Yakbi Igor zrosumiv and having said a kind word, having said a good word, having spoken to Vira, having blocked Yulci - but Igor can, it doesn’t matter to you , then everything would immediately fall into place.
Genk: - Rizh! Just lie, I won't fool you either.
Eh, yakbi Igor razumiv, not believing the threat, the light would be left to ourselves, de friendship is holy, truth triumphs, and nonsense is punished ...
Igor: - Don't you fool?.. Of course. Wha...
Maybe not varto all the same at the right place? Eh? .. It’s not much more than a garnet.
Genk: - No, pochav - speak!
Igor: - On the right, I passed, I blew you - I don’t want to steal.
Genk: - Vibachiv? I need your forgiveness!
Igor: - You do not need, then I need. How-not-how many times we were friends... Guess what I want about?
Genk: - I won’t guess and I won’t shake my head. You will tell yourself.
Igor: - Fuck it, old man, you're doing it yourself.
Genk: - You fill your own price!
Igor: - Garazd. Why not shake an old friend ... Shanovka public, we often played with him in disputes, and you paid us generously for everything - our separations ...
Genk: - Go grimacing, chimpanzee!
Igor: - My friend is already rude, vibachimo yogo. Rudeness is the minion of the valley: I, having moved, not making friends with others, I am a superhuman, strong specialty, but I don’t blame him for the spirit, whoever wants to get a little bit upright ...
Genk: - The yarliks themselves are glued, swearing, like a woman in black, but if you look - rude, vibachimo!
Igor: - We call out to the public, but once they collapsed vіch-na-vіch
Genk: - Axis about what! .. About the ledge ...
Igor: - So, about those. Small exhibition school baby. Podiya! Z ієї exhibitions of the best robots can go to Moscow. Would you like to take me to this exhibition? Wanted! І vin tse know. Ale... Ale, speaking at the committee of the Komsomol... What did you say about me, Genko?
Genk: - I showed only those who were earlier ... Toby! In the eyes!
Igor: - No, they told me: you navit roztlinnist me gluing ... In the eyes, speaking better, being afraid - I see a ball at your gate.
Genk: - But they didn’t tell you what I called you with talent?
Igor: - From the same, to make it easier to put the foot down ... Walking by the arm, and in the bosom lower trim, chasing the chest in the back.
Genk:- Tee!
Igor: - I asked myself - I did not stuff myself.
Genk: - Ti-and! .. Ti-and me! .. Wearing it in your bosom!
Igor: - having said the facts, but do not let the whiskers slacken іnshi.
Genk:- I am you! ..
Igor: - Come on, - quietly asking wine. - You're a sambo wrestler, you've learned a lot of vivertati.
Genk:- You bastard!
Igor: - I'm a bastard, you're a saint. Skinchim on tsoma. Amen.
Vira: - I'll just finish it. God! Yakby I knew...
Genk: - And you checked that I got everything!
Vira: - Give me better, don't need more yoga, lads. Come soon for me! ..
Genk: - I messed up. Thank you very much! Only I will not demand pity! Let's, let's go to the end! Everyone open up, I'm bachiv, yakі you ... Socrates, go ahead! Well! Your devil!
Socrates : - I'd sleep better for you, frateri.
Genk: - Here on іnshі pіsnі nalashtuvalis, hіba not bachish? Don't sing the choir.
Socrates : - And what about me, Genko ... We have a loyal friend with you.
Genk: - Don't fight, I won't hit you without hitting you. Emboss!
Socrates : - For me, the filthy nicole ... It’s obvious what I am to you: Socrates is a labuh, Socrates Onuchin is a no-cost addition to the guitar.
Natka: - Gena-a ... Why didn’t they just talk about you, badass! Navit lakali lower at the back you can. Axis yak! Do not trust anyone - you are clean, Gena, through and through to sterility. Boiled in boiled family water, where they were afraid to put a pinch of salt. Lower at the back - de vzhe.
Genk: - Nat-ka! Don't hesitate, please.
Natka: - And I'm serious, Genochko, I'm serious. Nobody knows you, everyone calls you, but don’t climb in the middle.
Genk:- What are you talking about, Natko?
Natka: - About you, only about you. Nothing more. Tsiliy rіk ti less than the night before seeing you home, but still not bothering to kiss. And on such a ration they suggest - lower at the back! I want to protect.
Genk: - Nat-ka! Is it like that?.. - Genka hovav his eyes, speaking hoarsely to the ground.
Natka: - Do not lie to me, what am I stealing?
Genk: - You know ... Stink - let me know what you want, but I ask you ...
Natka: - Wow - come on?! I - don't smіy?
Genk: - Grass?! Nut! New?
Natka: - To that, that warty of that. And so you and so pkhayut, and your little dog is crushed in front of the shop. Why do you stand on ceremony. Cowardly buv Vanya is vicious... Zhalyugіdny ty, Genko.
Genk: - W-well, Natko! .. Well! ..
Genk: - Until the day! True! .. You said - I'm callous. You - I'm a self-loving firefly. Ty - at the guards of me, lower at the back ... And ty, Natko ... Ty and zovsіm me - I can’t make a zradnik, zhalugіdny boyaguz, ganchіrka! Until the day... But why do you have days of difference? Chi is not superimposed! Who's right? Whom do you blame? .. They lied! Mustache lied! New? What am I doing to you filthy? Toby! Toby, Natko! I'm glad, I'm glad! Not knowing... We cracked... Now we've got it, we've beaten you! Through it!
Zagostreny Genka's voice. And nothing was dihala with river water and the smells of screeching herbs. In the thick of the weather it was warm on the edge. The first leaf of young lindens, which dispersed the light, gave in, itself merged the primary-tobіch light. I didn’t mention anything. Leaning forward with his body, Genka sighed with twisted appearances, and five people, who sat closely on the lava, listened to Yogo.
Pankov St.
In the rest of his creations (“After the day, what to live”, “Triyka, simka, ace”, “Court”) V. Tendryakov picks up, it would seem, even different problems. At first glance, there is no close connection between Biryukov's jokes, goodness in lіsosplavі and marvelous fall on watering, about yak can be found in the story "Court" ("Noviy Svit", 1961 No. 3). However, with all the differences in plots, characters, and specific life situations, there are connections between them - in line with the moral line: how to live? It can be boldly said that the writer of the hiba scho turns one topic from different sides, goes from the end of one task to the next. Giving great respect to the moral and ethical problems, V. Tendryakov does not pay attention to the important food of the present. Insha on the right - how do they stink?
At the “Sudі” the writer saw the nourishment of honesty and truthfulness of the people in front of him.
In my opinion, in literary discussions about this story, the image of Dudirev was not spared the most. Yaki only zakidi did not hoarse at the new one! Deyakі critics all zusily vikoristali those schob herself to Dudirev to attribute the worst sins. And in the meantime, read the story more respectfully ...
The old myslivets Semyon Teterin, the medical assistant Mityaghin and the head of the life of the great wood-working plant Dudirev appeared to be participants in the folding drama. Htos - Dudirev chi Mityagin - vipadkovo, without any navmisnosti driving a young lad. The first axis of the most recent investigation of the tragic fall. How do people behave, and not more than three, but the second investigator Dityatichev, the prosecutor Testov, the head of the collective state Donat Borovikov?
Dityatichev's soulless bureaucratic behavior. And, in fact, it looks like the best thing: from the carnival mirkuvans, you want to save Dudiryev, all the fault to call the weak and fearful Mityaghin. Dityatichev conducted the investigation in such a way that it drives people into faith in the truth and justice. Tse i є head vikrivalnym vistryam povisti. Dityatichev lost his way and shoved Semyon Teterin on the winding path. The old man of mischief does not know how to counter the lies, he himself opines in the position of a false witness. Tse yak bi "suffering result" of meanness and dishonor.
Ale є y povistі y. another topic, another setting before what happened. Adzhe Dudiryev is not only overwhelmed by Dityatichev, but he himself begins to be more able to evaluate his activity, more confidently to himself that of his vchinkiv. Dudirev has a growing opir, a confrontation with childish methods: And himself? .. Napolyagov budovat not capitally living quarters, but barracks, suggesting various arguments - quick, cheap, simple ... Goofy, simple! You don’t need to waste and save, you don’t need to be shy, you need to use the working force, you don’t need to be turbulent, so that your plans are solidified. Simpler! Easier! Hiba tse not called - shukati pіd likhtar?
The position of Dudireva is especially significant: it may not be significant for stating the sense of the story. Dudirev wants to seek the right solution and follow the law and sums. Vіn cherish moral authority, an unfortunate slump on the watering of zmushu yogo zagostrennya to think about people, about the attainment of socialist legitimacy. Zіtknennya z Dityatichevym zmushuє Dudireva could more easily analyze his own powers, raise moral criteria, act in the form of forgiveness and easier decisions.
Prote, repeating, deyakі reviewers put the lowest mark for behavior before Dudirova. It appears that the fault of honesty is less for the one who has a better life with a calm conscience. Nachebto vin mayzhe all having spent zі their good qualities. At the new one, one knows less “surpluses of your deity, natural, innate honesty, as if you were powerful to yourself and, singly, was powerful to your moral advocates. Let's sweat the wine, as if we couldn't save it, destroying it. It has been left out of it even chimalo - the axis of the nadadne pragnennya before it" (I. Borisova. So it happened ... "Literaturna Gazeta", April 27, 1961).
Young critic I. Borisova, do not be stingy, ascribe to Dudirev a lot of sins. Dudirev act as a reviewer at the expense of "innate honesty" and inspire the people on this basis, which, when analyzing a tragic mood, either one or the other arguments, win the sum'yattya. Ah, well, the new one has less “trained nobility”, the fault of the coincidences of “innocence in his noble essence”, nareshti, “when thinking about deceit, weathering the truth, Dudirev starts up poaching of the most mischievous shtibu”.
As it seems, Dudirev's conversions were gone, up to the end of moral corruption. However, at the same time, it is not accepted to the point of respect, what the wine does and what it morally gains, how its character develops. I. Borisov sued the hero earlier, lower the guilt of hearing and understanding in the future. So it is recognized as a bi nesuttevim opening up the spiritual process - give an example to a person who has “taken shape”. How about writing a story, so respectfully showing the dialectic of souls?!
And Dudirivs in the same time in the cinema - at the behavior of the movement in court. Here you can see that you have added wine, that you are morally rich and that you are left weak in the new, that you need to pay more. A greater objective assessment of Bachimo is in the article by O. Turkov “Dudiryev against Dudiryev” (“Komsomolskaya Pravda”, May 26, 1961). The critic clearly caught that Semyon Teterin is actually an ally in the name of the head of life.
It is impossible to deprive the pose of respect for the folding of Kostyantin Sergiyovich Dudiryev with us characters, the zokrema with Teterinim. Obviously, Semyon is a simple-hearted person. Childish yoga zalyakav and lost. And yet, at Teterin’s own testimony, “sovistness” and a distrust of the fact that people can be equal before the law are getting used to. Semyon from the very cob, until we grow close, richly in which the camp of Dudirev is folded, nibi shtovhaє yogo conquer his power, his infusion: “People, as if they were lawful to sit, marvel at you with honor.”
Such a turn is not up to like Kostyantin Sergiyovich. “Let me tell you about those who know the cool, the next,” Dudirev said dryly. “But I myself can’t help Mityaghin on my own.” Dudiriev is told to say "dryly". You can tell me that you won't read myslivtsev lectures about morality. Well, put it up to her not small. It’s not necessary to forget that Dudirev really doesn’t know whose kula caused the lad from the countryside village to a tragic death. Those that are visible to critics are invisible to the hero of the opposing.
Dudirev is reminded of the mindfulness and tensions of the poor Dityatichev, who is ready to lighten the camp of the chief of life. Dudirev does not give in to sly cunning, moreover, rіshuche zaperchuє: "... you are afraid of folding, joking about the truth, de lighter that sruchnіshe, and not there, de vain to lie right." It is not for nothing that Dityatichev “frowns”, he understands - put yoga on the table, try yoga methods.
Sum'yattya, folded experience of Dudirev, who is heard from the vbivs, understood. Ale wins to stand on the fact that everyone is equal before the law, not to “drown” Mityagina, but to make a fair decision for both: “I don’t respect myself like that, having committed evil, and also, I don’t respect Mityagina as a villain. If the court does not fit in with my arguments, if it is necessary to bear the punishment, then I am nevertheless obliged to bear the punishment for Mityaginim.
How to go in the direction of what is in the same story, Dudirev has been vigilantly tested, wanting to let him have a chance to learn even more great lessons from the new one. Now take away from Dudiryev his nobility, that democracy, like vins saved, having defended and in the name of such vins now (after the suvorodrams) become more active ?!
It is prote sense to bring the "Court" of applications and weakenings with a short period of time: in the case of the author's logical visnoviye, they do not shy away from artistic images. To that old thought bachish and take it anyway, below I explain this writer. Teterin of the nature is straight, honest, non-staining. Ale wonder, how to behave. Until tragically, he didn’t mark his own serious wadi: “Having taken into account that all people are filthy, such, like Dudirev ryatuє his own skin, do not suffer with conscience ... Bula is quiet, now it’s mute.” The steep was brewed on the right, and at once a weakness appeared. In this rank, Semyon zovsim is not sinless. The author of rozumіє tse i tim schonaymenshe "vityaguє" yogo role of the primordial custodian of the laws of conscience and honor. Nareshti, with the final phrase: “There is no heavy judgment, lower the judgment of your own conscience,” - the wrong soundings were given, as if the essence of the imagery and the characterizations were indicated.
On the greater side of the world, V. Tendryakov did not interpret Teterin as “separation for the people”. Myslivets and myslivets - with their smart, kind rice. Alas, for example, Semyon is raptly assigned the role of a “specialist”: a wholesome nature, a primary strength, and a reflection of non-disruptions. Dudirev navit vyprobovu provovoy before him: “Svorushuvavsya and forgetting that he himself will be new backwaters, importing new cars, if you want more than that, but making life easier. It’s easier, and then it’s amazing that Semyon Teterin, having left the forest with yoga, let it be suvorim, but with simple laws, to be ruined, to stray, to behave in a wrong way, like lying down.
Tsya "guilt" Dudirev, people, like nibito "attributed to the intelligentsia", is given to us far-fetched. Tim is more marvelous and slightly old-fashioned notes in the writings of V. Tendryakov, a writer, who knows the life of forces and small places well, for a long time life was shaped by a lack of culture, lack of roads, weak technical equipment of the rural state. It's good that we all far and wide are unique of these hours, that a new material and spiritual culture is more and more penetrating into the minds of all the people. Why is Dudirev guilty of complaining about his activity?
Chapter I. Artistic concept of V.F. Tendryakov 1970-1980s.
1.1. The artistic concept of specialness and specificity is expressed in the work of V.F.Tendryakov in the 1970s-1980s.
1.2. The problem of the offensiveness of moral values in the novel "Nothing after graduation".
1.3. Artistic conception of the special novel "Blackout".
1.4. The problem of moral values and food about the experience of sin in the story "Payment".
1.5. The problem of the moral awakening of the "inner person" in the novel "Sixty Candles".
1.6. moral jokes V.F.Tendryakov’s novel “Swing on the Mirage” under the bag.
Rozdil II. The artistic conception of the special context of history in the work of V.F.Tendryakov in the 1970s-1980s.
2.1. The specifics of the implementation of the artistic concept of the specific context of history in the work of V.F.Tendryakov in the 1970s-1980s.
2.2. The problem of spiritual transformation of the specialty of history (On the example of the description "Bread for the dog").
2.3. Lyudina at war in the description of "Don Hann".
2.4. Historical process and share of specialty (On the butt artistic analysis poems "Poluvannya" and "On the blessed island of communism").
2.5. The peculiarity of this story is in the povist «People and non-humans».
2.6. Lyudina, reckoned to history, in the story “Revolution! Revolution! Revolution!"
2.7. Artistic conception of the peculiarity of history in the novel "Swing on the Mirage".
Recommended list of dissertations
Artistic concept of G.V. Semenov 2010 rіk, candidate of philological sciences Maslєeva, Svіtlana Mykolaivna
Artistic concept of the special historical novel of the twentieth century: A.Yu. Segen, V.V. Lichutin 2008 candidate of philological sciences Gyulnazaryan, Nataliya Evgenivna
Traditions of Andriy Platonov in the philosophical and aesthetic jokes of Russian prose of the other half of the XX - the beginning of the XXI century. 2010 Rick, Doctor of Philological Sciences Serafimova, Vira Dmitrivna
"Word" F.M. Dostoevsky in the work of V.Є. Maksimova 2011 rіk, candidate of philological sciences Umnov, Artem Evgenovich
Udmurt prose of the other half of the 20th – the beginning of the 21st century: people of that world, evolution, peculiarities of artistic inspiration 2009 rіk, doctor of philological sciences Zaytseva, Tetyana Ivanivna
Introduction to the dissertation (part of the abstract) on the topic “Artistic concept of the special creativity of V.F. Tendryakov, 1970-1980s..”
V.F.Tendryakov, as a writer, starting from the 1950s, was familiar with the wide range of problems of his work (viysk, silska, historical, pobutova, etc.). At the center of this problematics, fundamental moral nourishment has been laid. "More and more treasures of moral proof, lower artistic literature, I’m getting better, people still don’t have anything, ”signifying the writer. V.F.Tendryakov’s plans for this plan are the last ones, which signify the paths of “moral rebirth” of specialness.
It is important to note that the specifics of V.F.Tendryakov’s work of 1970-1980, its ethical and valuable orientations are fully manifested by the improvement of the full-fledged artistic way of the writer, at the light of his formation. The undoubted fact of such a decline is those that V.F.Tendryakov already had in the works of 50-60s. he saw his ethical position from the mass literary flow of socialist realism, for which he most often recognized sharp criticism. The creativity of the writer was a characteristic example of the fact that, like a link to the era, “the work is in the "spirit of the hour"" (Yu. Seleznyov) is not guilty of becoming the pov'yazanistyu of the era. Considering that other life situation, V.F. Yoga issues early creativity let's talk about raising a lot of moral problems, solving those in the whole world appeared in the artistic joke of the 70-80s.
Creativity V.F.Tendryakov 1970-1980 pp. one can see the specific direction of the writer’s artistic position: “You need to be aware that you yourself command people to do good, morally.” In this rank, the central task of V.F.Tendryakov’s work for the appointed period is recognized as a shlyakhiv way of transforming the specialty and world in line with calling people to the creation of good.
One of the essential problems of the art of literary studies at the stage is the problem of the development of V.F.Tendryakov's creativity. Dissertation studies of the past years (1964-1975), which showed the fundamental position of Radyansk literary studies in the assessment of the literary works of the writer, look at the early (50-60-ty pp.) period of creative work (1964, Shamurz9, V.F.Tendryakova; B.Klyusov, 1967; S.Lakishik, 1967; T.Peresunko, 1970; V.Bildushkinov, 1971; A.Goncharova, 1971; A.Gutorov, 1973; according to V.F.Tendryakov in the 70s. late period creativity of the writer (1970–1980).
Complete a wide assessment of the early and middle periods artistic creativity writer Radyansk literary studies, ignoring the deep sociological pidhіd, varied from ascribed to V.Tendryakov the system of values of the Radyansk culture to sharp criticism for the development of the ideals of the system. At 70-80s. in the wake of the publication of new works of the writer, there was a low number of critical articles in the journals "Literaturniy Oglyad", "Noviy Svit", "Neva", "Zhovten", they were rated differently. The main criterion for evaluating the works of a writer was the validity of an officially approved artistic method - socialist realism. The subject of the study is the critical and literary studies of the 70-80s. boules: style and creative method of V.F. Tendryakov, moral problems of creations, nourishment of artistic mastery, problems of environment, conflicts, characteristics of the writer's prose. Zagal can be called a universal, systemic analysis of the creativity of a writer, and to inspire a different aspect, often a super-sophisticated interpretation of his works.
Since the beginning of the 90s, the interest in the work of V.F. Foreign literary studies, for the most part, show off one's own creativity of a writer. Have 1990 r. The monographic work of the Chinese scientist Kh.
Since the year 2000, it is low for the scholars of the world to seriously consider the necessity of “turning” to the creativity of V.F.Tendryakov and rethinking in the categories of modern literary studies. So, for example, V. Ogryzko at the article “Darkened that vision” (2006) reads: “Dosi I can’t understand why we don’t see Tendryakov at the age of fifteen.<.>Nevzhe Tendryakov is so old and old and now the essence of the middle of the twentieth century is touched by new generations?<.>I know one thing for sure: you don’t need to hurry to write off Tendryakov on the monument of history. ”
Modern votchiznyany (V. Barakov, M. Dunayev, I. Zolotussky, V. Ogryzk) and foreign (Alexandra Smith, David Gillespie, Kenneth Lantz, Hyun-Tack Kim,) literary studies can try "episodic" analysis (on the butt of single ) creative), which can be zastosovnі inclusively to private nourishment of the writer's creativity. Together with tim, appearing in 1995. VF Tendryakov's book "Nevidane", as it did not become the subject of deep respect for criticism, also naming the choice of the chronological framework of the dissertation object, straightened on the whole, systemic and axiological development of the writer's creativity of the 1970-1980s. To finish guessing what the rest of the monographic work of V.F.Tendryakov helped the light of 1985 rock.
The main focus of our study was the task of reviewing the work of V.F.Tendryakov 70-80 pp. as a sub-bag and potentially productive in the context of the author's rethinking of the moral and axiological concept of light. Such a search of a writer brought together a lot of summaries of the author's development: the artistic concept of specialness and the cultural and historical context of the specialness, - that zoomed in on the choice of the most promising for the analysis of the chronology of creativity. It is fundamentally important in connection with cym є following the author’s “strength of joking to the ideal”, as the image of the tower by the writer of key ontological and historical nutrition is signified.
Follow-up of V.F. At the same time, the leader of his speech seemed to be somehow different (at the point of view of the socially impoverished look), as close as possible to the subject of his description of the literary position. In this rank, the important criteria of the author's inquiry in this perspective are the spiritual situation of history and the comprehension of the main links of light.
The topicality of the dissertation is conditioned by the urgent need to lead up to the work of V.F. In literary studies, there was a single pidkhid until the understanding of the “artistic concept of specialness”. The development of the artistic conception of specificity in the work of V.F.Tendryakov allows to reveal the daily categories of philosophical and ethical and moral-ontological shukan of the writer and to combine them with the ideals and values of the Orthodox cultural tradition. The productivity of this approach is clearly indicated in modern literary studies by the problem of turning to the traditional Orthodox axiological paradigm of continuing the creativity of the writer of the Radian era and the existence of the systemic basis of such education.
The subject of the study is the artistic concept of V.F. Tendryakov’s special creativity in the ethical and aesthetic integrity.
The object of follow-up of representations by artistic creations
V.F.Tendryakov 1970-1980s. In addition, the synthesis of journalistic forms is based on the author's position.
The meta-robot is used in the rich-aspect analysis of the moral and axio- logical problems of the artistic conception of the specificity of V.F.Tendryakov’s creativity in relation to the main categories of Orthodox culture.
Vidpovidno to the point of the dissertation, there are such following tasks: the introduction of individual features of the ethical-axiological "code" of the writer's creativity and the originality of his artistic inspiration in skin analysis work (review, proverb) a description of the assessment of the most important ethical and aesthetic categories of the writer's creativity, which will form the artistic concept of specialness; the development of the sensory-creative context of the functioning of the ethical and aesthetic categories of creativity among the fundamental categories of Orthodox culture.
Follow-up methods. At the dissertation, the historical-functional and chronological-typological methods and literary analysis are being developed. The robot wins a systemic pidkhid, which allows you to continue the artistic concept of special creativity
VF Tendryakov in philosophical, religious and ethical, cultural and historical aspects.
Theoretical and methodological basis of the dissertation was served by literary studies that focus on the spiritual and Orthodox paradigm (V.M. Barakov, M.M. Dunaev, I.A. Esaulov, V.V. Kozhinov, M.P. Seleznyov and in.), Russian religious philosophers and thinkers (Yu.Yu.Bulichev, F.M.Dostoevsky, I.A.Ilyin, A.L.Kazin, L.P.Karsavin, I.V. N.O.Losky, S.V.Perevezentsev, E.N.Trubetskoy, S.L.Frank,
S.S. Khoruzhyy ta іn.), as well as the practice of moral theology (St.
Ioan Chrysostom, Metropolitan Ioan Snichov, Rev. Ioan Lestvichnik, Archbishop Ioan Shakhovsky, Archbishop Ilarion Troitsky, St. Theophan the Recluse, etc.).
The goals set, the nature of taking away the results from the marriage, signify the scientific novelty of the work.
The dissertation of presentations has a systemic analysis of the artistic conception of the peculiarity of the work of V.F.Tendryakov in the 1970s-1980s. The scientific novelty of the object of research is attributed to the lack of workmanship of the writers of the 70-80s. The artistic concept of specialness continues in the integrity of the system of cultural and historical links, which allows us to see the specific ethical and aesthetic categories of the writer's creativity: the category of the near, the category of moral transformation, the category of historical memory. Conducting research until completion, orientations of the main value of the Russian spiritual tradition, denoting an adequate assessment of the category of artistic conception of the writer. The dissertation victors have a productive insight into the Russian Christian philosophy and moral theology, which allows to explore new aspects of the concept of "the concept of specialness", which was not achieved by the literary sciences.
Regulations for blaming the Zakhist:
1. The artistic concept of V.F.Tendryakov’s special creativity is realized in the image of a person who is in the camp of a moral-ontological joke.
2. The main types of heroes in the work of V.F.Tendryakov are “ambivalent” and “his-centric” specialness.
3. The artistic concept of VF Tendryakov's special creativity is connected with the historical context of a human being. It will be realized with the improvement of cultural and historical links of particularity, offensiveness of traditions, spiritual and moral values, acceptance of people's historical viability.
4. Fundamental, ethically primordial, reference category in the work of V.F.Tendryakov in 1970-1980. є category of the neighbor, which reveals other axiological dominants: the ideal of transformation, animalism to the “internal people”, the ideal of “reciprocity”. The category of the neighbor in the artistic concept of specialness is the category of creativity, which directs a person to the ideal of spiritual and moral convergence.
Theoreticity znachimіst disertatsії viznachaєtsya doslіdzhennyam mainly YETİK-estetichnih kategorіy (kategorіya neighbor kategorіya people kategorіya іstorichnostі, kategorіya vseєdnostі that іn.) In lіteraturoznavchomu, fіlosofskomu, teologіchnomu aspects that suttєvіstyu rezultatіv doslіdzhennya in zagalnomu kontekstі uwagi to rosіyskogo lіteraturnogo Process zagalom at Yogo cultures - historical connection with the national spiritual tradition The dissertation has broken up new aspects of the actual problems of contemporary literary studies, the development of the artistic concept of specialness. The dissertation materials can be reviewed from the perspective of the development of the most important ethical and aesthetic categories of literature.
Practical value of dissertation. The specific results of the study carried out can be reviewed by the university (lectures, special courses, special seminars) and school curricula Russian wedding. literature of the XX century and the theory of literature.
Approbation.
The main provisions of the dissertation are reflected in the articles presented at international, all-Russian, regional conferences during 2005-2007, in the Russian journals "Cultural life of Pivdnya Russia", "Scientific thought to the Caucasus", "Bulletin of MGOU", "Bulletin of ASPU" and the dawn of ASPU "Bulgarian Russian Studies", international and internal university collections. Results of the work on visvіtlyuvalisya mіzhnarodnih, vserosіyskih, regіonalnih, mіzhvuzіvskih, vnutrіshnovuzіvskih konferentsіyah in state-sponsored Chelyabіnskomu pedagogіchnomu unіversitetі, Maskovskiy vіdkritomu unіversitetі state-sponsored, state-sponsored Stavropolskomu unіversitetі, Armavіrskomu state-sponsored pedagogіchnomu unіversitetі, Armavіrskomu Orthodox sotsіalnomu іnstitutі. . Moscow).
Structure
Vіdpovіdno before the appointment at the head of the dissertation, the dissertation is formed from the Entry, two divisions, Visnovkіv and bibliographic list, which includes 337 names.
Similar dissertation works for the specialty "Russian Literature", 10.01.01 VAK code
Spiritual and moral quizzes of writers-traditionalists of the other half of the 20th century: V. Shukshin, V. Rasputin, V. Belov, V. Astaf'ev 2005 Rick, Doctor of Philological Sciences Sokolova, Larisa Vasilivna
Artistic vision of moral and ethical problems in contemporary Kabardian prose (poetry) 2008 rіk, candidate of philological sciences Bozieva, Agnes Abulesivna
Y. Davidov's Historical Prose of the 1960s - 2000s: Problems and Poetics 2009, candidate of philological sciences Sidorov, Anton Volodimirovich
Philosophical and moral understanding of the share of Russia in the prose of Panteleimon Romanov 1999, candidate of philological sciences Shcherbakova, Natalia Ivanivna
The moral image of the contemporary artist is the principle of this image in creativity I. Kishnyakova 2007 rіk, candidate of philological sciences Shchankina, Yuliya Ivanivna
Visnovok dissertation on the topic "Russian Literature", Shuster, Viktoria Gennadiivna
The connection between the artistic conception of specialness and history and artistic and aesthetic integrity, which is realized as the dignity of a person until the end of the past, today, the future, in a kind of expression of the moral ideals, a look at the values. Understanding the history of V.F.Tendryakov's work without intermediary with the concept of specialness, with the idea of moral growth of a person.
The further artistic conception of the peculiarity of the historical context allows us to recognize the primordial ontological sensations of all categories of writer's creativity. “At the most, it would seem, to an insignificant manifestation of our everyday “special” life, - write the literary scholar V. Kozhinov, daylight. The first artistic tvir will be good if "life itself" is less so in that moment, as if it were intact until the next day. The very "burning camp of the modern world", its actual problems and searches for answers to the eternal food buttya, drinking the historical hour - the central themes of the cycle "Class grimaces, or Pictures of history". This is the reason for the author's atrocity to history.
At the center of an artistic writer's joke, the specialty of that її setting to the neighbor is lost. The history of the creativity of a writer is the ashes of showing specialness. Particular respect is given to mutual ideas. The very її artistic-historical rozumіnnya as a first line is used in other warehouses of the author's concept.
In the first place, the active cob of mutuality in V.F. Tendryakov’s mind lies with the people themselves, the essence of which is called before the transformation: “People’s blues are the area of the most savory food.<.>and tsі vіdnosiny universal people will end. The hero of V.F.Tendryakov, among them the autobiographical hero, perebuvayut in history, touching his sense, leading the beasts to sharpening, spying on his reason for the butt of his neighbor. Insanely, not in a chic way, but in its own ethical quality in the historical prose of the writer, the dominating person is the "inner" person - a character, potentially open to reincarnation. The category of the neighbor in the historical prose of V.F.Tendryakov is the category of creativity, which instills the special features of the internal ethical and aesthetic potential.
In a different way, the significant warehouse creativity of V.F. It is significant that this category of artistic conception of the particularity of a writer should go through the most advanced path of his approval. Most of the “documentary prose” is devoted to the problems of the people. The right meaning of the collectivization and the expansion of the kulak, piece hunger is portrayed by V.F. .
Spiritual and moral potential of the people of V.F. So how else can the artist's concept of V.F. One of them is “creative work” to the people, which brings a sense of moral transformation of the people. The “documentary prose” of the writer has a present and selective type of Russian folk character- the image of Claudia from the story
Poluvannya ”- I had moral ideals and values. The most important stage creative robots VF Tendryakov became the exercise to show the area of moral aspirations to the people as a special call to charity.
Thirdly, insanely, fundamentally successful warehouse artistic concept of the writer is the category of history in the ethical-axiological world. Historical evidence of particularity and the most important intellectual and moral convergence. “The people and the world, the people and the people are eternal problems, which are especially aggravated in the moments of evil in history”, - marks the end of the writer's work M. Rubtsov. VF Tendryakov's key points of the historical battle go up to the line that directly signifies the moral transformation. This kind of author's task is "to understand the modernity of the world" її vlasnoї istorichestі "". In this context, V.F.Tendryakov’s “mysterious journalism” represents nothing more than an artistic and metaphysical way of comprehending the “mysterious” history.
The historical concept of the writer's work is chronologically marked by the time line of the generational battle, which the autobiographical hero Volodya Tenkov belongs to, but it is also a change to go between the chronologies of the chronology: Thus, the concept of history by V.F. human memory to a space-hour picture of the world. The position of memory, which zmushuє borderline expansion between generations, at one time, - the chronological framework of the historical path, becomes the criteria for moral and axiological assessment. artistic hour in the historical context, the prose of the writer is the primordial basis of the world. “The Burning Hour” of the 20th century is changing its own share of characters, zmushu robit and choose between one’s own individuality and the well-being of one’s neighbor, between moral convergence and growth. Ale is the author of perekonaniya at the only possibility of such a choice:<.>there wasn’t, there wasn’t and there wouldn’t be a person, a building to live on her own, independent of anyone. ”
Do not call out the sumnivu that the historicism of the prose writer of the directives is the main rank of the prospects of tomorrow, the horizon of the butt. It is necessary to note such a peculiarity of V.F. mabut, і polagaє, schob її vyaviviti. In this way, this concept of historical determinism fundamentally diverges from the Orthodox historiosophical outlook, de "regularity often looks like providentialism."
The historicity of V.F.Tendryakov's artistic work is inextricably linked with the categories of memory and evidence. Tsey sens, contributions to the people, how to organize themselves, to call on the special, to the people to "internal goiter" to create "the best of the best"" (I. Ilyin). Formulating the main metaphor of the writer, V.F.Tendryakov added: “A true artist cannot think without love for his people, for his national peculiarities, for his traditions, for the earth, for his life”.
WISNOVOK
The fundamental goals of our dissertation were followed by the artistic conception of the specialty of V.F.Tendryakov’s work in the 70-80s. with urahuvannyam її productive connection with history. Such a perspective of the dissertation signified the final sub-bag character of the system of artistic and journalistic whole in the general obyazheniya yogo expression (buttjevo-special, cultural-historical, ethical-aesthetic aspects).
Theoretical methodologica Base Dzlіzzhenna, Shaho Okhoplyuє Roboti, Culturalism, Moral Theologian, Rosіyskoy Christianism, Datty Tsіlіxnie, Systems, Bagate Aquisine AnaliSti, Concepts, Creative Cotture, V.F. TDryakov 70-80-X RR., reveal new categories and aspects of the subject matter.
Within the framework of the concept of work, the importance of the unity of the main ethical and aesthetic categories of the writer's creativity, which established the artistic concept of specialness, was important: the category of morality (the main luminous ear); the category of history (for the time being, the ethical warehouse of human reason and the most important criterion of objectivity “thinking about facts”); special category (unit of transmission of moral proof and tradition, warehouse part butte-historical integrity); the category of the neighbor (a universal category that signifies the mutual relations of people). The connection between these categories in the work of VF Tendryakov becomes ethical and axiological wholeness, expressed in the ideal of the moral transformation of a person.
V.F. Tendryakov tried to voice the moral problems of the present, including the “creativity on a religious theme” (V. Krupin) - the novel “Swing on the Mirage”. Tim is no less, spiritually and ethically recognizable, who could lie at the bosom of an Orthodox and look at the people of that world, so they could not look at the writer's prose. Such categories, such as conciliarity, spirituality, are uncompromisingly realized in the artist's work as a fundamental religious imbecile. There are a lot of problems for that, that one should stand at the works of V.F.Tendryakov without knowing one's absolute perfection.
Creativity of V.F.Tendryakov in the 1970s-1980s. wear a clear expression of a moral-philosophical, journalistic character. At the forefront are the problems of creations, the specialness of the characters, the image of the inner world, the moral and ontological shukan of specialness. The plot side of creativity is secondary and often acts as a way of "choosing" literary heroes to solve a single problem. In the story “Rozplata” all the characters react to being beaten by the father blue: from the reader to the next. The heroes of creation acknowledge their accountability to the point that the order is taken from them. In addition, in the prose of the 70s, we know the example of how the characters of various works (“Blackout” and “Rozplati”) “reshape”. Having become evidence of Kolya's father being beaten (one plot situation), the characters of various works are united at the solution of the problem of a person's viability for those who are involved.
The further development of the artistic concept of the peculiarity of the writer's creativity made it possible to recognize the specificity of the image of a person and to reveal the typology of the characters, apparently to the principles of relevance. The hero in the prose of V.F.Tendryakov of the 70-80s of the rokiv is the specialty of “who is standing”, which reveals one’s own potential of the “internal person”. For the writer, it is typical to depict characters at the turning point, problematic moments of their butt (Kolya Koryakin from “Payment”, the characters from “Nothing After Release”), or the creation of any stage of the way of specialness, its formation (Paul and Maya from “Darkening”, Volodya Tenkov from cycle "Class Grimaces, or Pictures of History"). In the image, the four characters will have a part way of life, that problematic situation: Mykola Echevin from "Sixty candles" A book to show people two on the cob: one moral ideal and a path of specialness of that ideal. According to V.F.Tendryakov, the awakening of a person’s moral grounds is more than enough for the mind of a neighbor’s neighbor, one day from her. The main type of hero in the writer's prose is ambivalent "speciality, as we see the value of the "internal people": Kolya Koryakin ("Rozplata"), Mykola Echevin ("Sixty Candles"), Maya Shkanova ("Darkening"), autobiographical hero of the cycle "Class Grimace" , or the Image of History". In the prose of the 70-80s. daily positive hero. Vinyatkoy - the image of Claudia in the novel "Poluvannya", like a writer imbued with a Russian character, moral ideals and values. At the same time, the image of Claudia in the work is different, and it is more clever to make it smarter. The second type of hero in the writings of the writer is “his centric singularity”, in others he is more important than “a person of outward appearance”: Pavlo Krokhalev, the hero of the story “Blackout”; Igor Proukhov, character in "Nothing after graduation"; Raisa from the novel "Poluvannya".
The artistic conception of V.F.Tendryakov's special creativity is implicitly connected with the historical background of the human butt. Tsej vyazok є osslennyam podіy past in the context of the moral development of the special. The ideal of a historical butt for a writer of expressions of the idea of "spiritual progress", the original path of transformation of specialness. History of the 20-60s. XX century is reinterpreted by V.F.Tendryakov through rethinking his way of life. The artistic specificity of the cycle of stories and the description of “Class grimaces, or Pictures of history” is the image of the autobiographical hero Volodya Tenko and the author, among whom there is no new identity. VF Tendryakov gives a moral assessment to the characters' experiences, even though the author's position is weakly expressed in the works.
The development of the artistic concept of specialness made it possible to recognize the system of the most important ethical and aesthetic categories of the writer's creativity. Initial significance of prose of the 70-80s. I have the category of neighbor. Nabuttya neighbor - the ideal of moral purposefulness of literary characters in works. The letter shows how people's paths to the ideal are superbly poignant: love to the "neighbor" (Katya Grebina ("Swing on the Mirage")), love to the whole people (Maya
Shkanova (“Blackout”)), kohannya like a viraz of his “I” (Pavlo Krokhalev (“Blackout”)). The pismennik shows that there are such paths to the near future. The problem of love to one's neighbor becomes a common one in the novel "People are nonhumans". The main criterion of ethical and aesthetic assessment by V.F. The writer gets the nourishment of spіvvіdshnennja іdеаlu і іdіsnostі, fоr wіth wіth minds іѕ mіsnennya іdealu. Under the bag of such an artistic and philosophical joke, it often appears to accept the logic of social and historical determinism. Such a path is “a hopeless attempt at an objective dialogue with deeply subjective criteria” (Metropolitan Mikolay).
Carrying out a rich-aspect analysis of the ethical problems of the artistic conception of specialness, having revealed such significant categories of creativity of V.F. . The specifics of our approach, which is based on the system of values of Orthodox culture, allowed us to give an adequate assessment of the creativity of the writer. The dissertation, on the basis of a positive insight into Orthodox anthropology, developed new aspects of the concept of "artistic conception of specialness", such as: "inner person", "outward person", "ambivalent specialness", "spiritual and moral transformation of a person". Tse allow me to talk about the prospect of using materials for dissertations with the added category of "artistic concept of specialness" in the creativity of writers in domestic and foreign literature. The analysis of the artistic conception of the peculiarity of history, the ideas of these robots, allows us to comprehend the creativity of V.F. Such a concept can be continued both in the early and middle period of V.F.
List of literature for dissertation research candidate of philological sciences Shuster, Viktoria Gennadiivna, 2008
1. Avchenko V. Know Russia// Our contemporary. - 2001. - No. 9. - S. 87-94.
2. Agranovsky V.A. individuals. Write and draw. / Pislyamova V.Tendryakova. -M: Mol. guard, 1982.-463 p.
3. Anisin A.L. Before the cathedral ontology of special features // Russian edition Electronic resource. Electron. given. - Access mode: http://russned.ru/stats.php?ID=43.
4. Anisin A.L. Contemporary historicity as a perversion of sense // Russian edition Electronic resource. - Electron, yes. Access mode: http://russned.ru/stats/540.
5. Arkhangelska N., Arkhangelsky L. “People, why am I!”: Family-moral development of literature // Literary review. – 1981.-№ 6.-S. 25-31.
6. Archbishop Ilarion (Trinity). There is no order without the Church. M: Stritensky Monastery, 1999. - 137 p.
7. Archbishop John of San Francisco (Shakhovsky). Move with the Russian people. -M: Loddya, 2004. 159 p.
8. Archbishop John of San Francisco (Shakhivsky). Established unity. M .: View of the Stritensky Monastery, 2006. - 256 p.
9. Archbishop Seraphim (Sobolev) Russian ideology. St. Petersburg: Tsar's Right, 1994.-271 p.
10. Archimandrite Platon. Orthodox moral theology. M.: Vidavnitstvo of the Holy Trinity Sergiev Lavra, 1994. - 241 p.
11. Barakov V.M. Vidatny Vologda: Biographical drawings / Ed.13
To respect, the presentation of more scientific texts of the dissertation for recognition and removal for further recognition of the original texts of dissertations (OCR). In connection with them, they may have pardons, due to the lack of thoroughness of the recognition algorithms. In PDF files of dissertations and abstracts, as we deliver, there are no such pardons.
2. Asmolova - “Behind the country, I’m stealing yaku ...” //Lessons in Literature. - 2005. - No. 1. - Z
3. On the way to spending and gaining. // Zhovten. - 1988. - No. 11. - S. 196 - 199.
4. Volodymyr Fedorovich Tendryakov: Bibliographic indicator/way of life. , . - Vologda, 1993. - 128 p.
5. Glushikhin's payment. Tendryakova "Donna Anna" at the lesson of the XI class // Vechirnya secondary school. - 1989. - No. 4. - S. 43 - 45.
6. Hidden Tendryakov // Youth. - 1989. - No. 9. - S. 84 - 87.
8. Nevicherpne, wrong // Chi, in fact, are super girls? - M.: 1989. - S. 371 - 399.
9. Lauri povisti V. Tendryakova “People and non-humans” // Lessons of Literature. - 2005. - No. 1. - S. 9 - 10.
11. Reznikova over the word according to the story of V. Tendryakov “People are not people” // Vіdkrita school. - 1997. - No. 6. - S. 61 - 62.
12. Like a human being // Literary review. - 1989. - No. 12. - S. 45 - 47.
13. Russian writers. XX century. Bibliographic dictionary. At 2 hours, part 2. M - Ya. / For red. - M.: Prosvitnitstvo, 1998. - P. 432 - 434.
14. Russian writers of the XX century. Biographical dictionary / Ch. ed. i comp. . - M.: Great Russian Encyclopedia; rendezvous. - A. M. 2000. - S. 680 - 681.
15. The truth is one for all. Notes about create on viysk theme// Literary Russia. - 1985. - 31 May. - C.3.
16. Kroki commander / / Prapor. - 1989. - No. 2. - S. 223 - 231.
17. Shumilova wars in the stories of V. Tendryakov of the 70s // Velika Vitchiznyan war in Radianskaya Literature. - M.: 1985. - S. 105 - 112.
1. Before reading…………………………………………. 3 side
2. U. Tendryakov: a man of war……………...…….5 side.
4. Literature………………………………………… 18 pages.
Organizer:
Editor:
Voucher for release:
In the designed material vikoristan
photographs of that little girl Volodymyr Fedorovich Tendryakov
Volodymyr Tendryakov: people that war: Methodical materials/ Order. , Ed. ; Vol. region young man. b-ka im. . - Vologda, 20 p.
